The Delhi HC judge, known for 'bold pronouncements', is at the heart of the latest row in the judiciary as proposals to transfer him have been stalled.
An advocate has challenged a policy tweak that made it compulsory for students of all KVs to chant Sanskrit shlokas and a Hindi prayer in the morning assembly.
The Supreme Court said that the upcoming general election and exercise of NRC should not be affected, and asked the competent authorities to sit together to plan them.
Retired judge breaks silence on judge elevation row, says not aware of additional material that could have led to collegium rescinding December decision.
Going through their Instagrams and dissecting their ‘statements’ is not the astute political commentary you think it is—it is time for us to back off from targeting 20-year-olds.
Companies are borrowing more from banks and public. Economists say high capacity utilisation & growing new orders could set stage for renewed investment push by India Inc.
New Delhi has, in past, too, objected to Chinese construction activities in Shaksgam Valley. Work in this strategic region gathered pace after the 2017 Doklam stand-off.
A theme has not yet emerged for BJP & people see lack of a contest, which makes it unexciting. For all these reasons, 2024 is turning out to be an unexpectedly theme-less election.
Justice muralidhar is one of very few judges left who have conscience and integrity. His judgments peak for themselves he has never been biased to any political ideology and his decisions have equally affected almost all the political parties.
Justice Muralidhar is a biased judge and that says it all. If you’re in the higher echelons of the judiciary, you cannot be constantly influenced by activists who jaundice your vision. Justice Muralidhar’s judgements and clearly visual biases prove that he is unfit to be a judge. He should have been a judge during the Emergency, fighting against the basic freedoms of the people of India and for a morally corrupt head of government. In his attempt to kowtow to the people who want to destroy India, he betrays India and all its citizend. Who needs such a justice?
Being unbiased in cases where one side is powerful and the other side is disadvantaged, is wrong? What is your logic? Justice Murlidhar has in fact protected the real Indias, against the criminals. He is the nationalist in a true sense.
With due respect, J Muralidhar is amongst the poorest judges on the bench. A judge must be free from emotion & fair. J Muralidhar has given some shocking judgments, which make headlines & sound good but are very wrong in law.
Justice Muralidaran is a blot on justice. One wonders how he made it to the Bench. A Commie in a black robe, should be impeached post haste.
Justice muralidhar is one of very few judges left who have conscience and integrity. His judgments peak for themselves he has never been biased to any political ideology and his decisions have equally affected almost all the political parties.
Justice Muralidhar is a biased judge and that says it all. If you’re in the higher echelons of the judiciary, you cannot be constantly influenced by activists who jaundice your vision. Justice Muralidhar’s judgements and clearly visual biases prove that he is unfit to be a judge. He should have been a judge during the Emergency, fighting against the basic freedoms of the people of India and for a morally corrupt head of government. In his attempt to kowtow to the people who want to destroy India, he betrays India and all its citizend. Who needs such a justice?
Being unbiased in cases where one side is powerful and the other side is disadvantaged, is wrong? What is your logic? Justice Murlidhar has in fact protected the real Indias, against the criminals. He is the nationalist in a true sense.
With due respect, J Muralidhar is amongst the poorest judges on the bench. A judge must be free from emotion & fair. J Muralidhar has given some shocking judgments, which make headlines & sound good but are very wrong in law.
For example? Give some references to the cases?