SubscriberWrites: Literacy is not the measure of education. Application should be the discerning factor

Education is about knowing your skills, abilities and learning, and then using them in the right place at the right time, to produce something useful, writes Col KL Viswanathan. 

A classroom of a primary school in Shamli district | Urjita Bhardwaj | ThePrint
A classroom of a primary school in Shamli district | Urjita Bhardwaj | ThePrint

Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.

Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/

There is a daily programme on one of the business channels on television,  where a very experienced investor interviews, each day, a different  successful investor, who “reveals” his success stories -and failures- in the  market before becoming a wealthy investor. One of the questions asked  to the interviewee is to name his favourite book related to investing.  There was one very successful investor interviewed, a self-proclaimed  school dropout, who said that he has never read any book any time in his  whole life. Yet he successfully founded an investment company managing  assets worth millions. That is education by any standard. On the contrary,  about a decade plus ago, we were interviewing fresh engineers for our  manufacturing unit making electrostatic equipment. We were stunned to  see that about seventy five percent of the candidates, electrical  engineering graduates, were unable to define static electricity; on the  contrary we have any number of examples of school dropouts who made  it big in various fields.  

Traditionally, the basic meaning of literacy has been the ability to read  and write. The generally perceived and widely accepted definition of  education often refers to formal education, which takes place under the  guidance of tutors in a structured formal ecosystem. The formal  structures in education are arranged in a hierarchical manner such as  primary school, secondary school, college, and university. Education is  understood as the acquisition of knowledge through a process of receiving  or giving systematic instruction.  

While literacy is a key factor that helps to measure the education level in  a country, these two terms are not interchangeable. The fundamental  difference between education and literacy, as perceived, could be that  literacy basically refers to the ability to read and write whereas education  refers to the acquisition of knowledge and its useful deployment even as  the UNESCO defines literacy as the ability to identify, understand,  interpret, create, communicate and compute, using printed and written  materials associated with varying contexts. Ironically, as in the case of  the two foregoing illustrations of the investor and fresh engineers, there is  a flaw in defining education rendering mere graduation a suspect in  gaining knowledge and using it fruitfully. We can then redefine literacy as  an enabler to acquire skills and learning, while education is about  applying these skills for the benefit of society. These days students are  just getting literate but not educated. In a nutshell, it is important to gain  Knowledge than to be just literate, to be useful to self and society.  

It is mentioned in our ancient literatures, that the people were recognized  by their respective occupation, warrior, trader and those rendering  assorted services. Those who learned the Vedas were known as Brahmins.  Generally, the vocations were passed on from father to son, who learnt 

the various crafts mostly under the tutelage and guidance of the parent.  Somewhere along the way, the system degenerated into the caste system  we know today. Be that it may, the point here is that crafts and skills  were learned within the family rather than from elsewhere. Professions  were handed over within the family, before the idea of collective  education germinated, maybe, in the form of gurukuls etc. A literate may  or may not have degrees but she is considered as educated when her  skills are enhanced and she is able to employ her learning and skills for  the good of the society  

It is evident that any person who can read and write cannot be called an  educated person. Education is a much broader concept than literacy. All  around the world, especially In India, it is seen that there are many who  

are literate but, least who are educated. The problem in India is not about  unemployment. It is one of unemployability. Even after attending school  and college for fifteen years most are left with inadequate skills and  remain uneducated and unskilled. This can be seen in some of the Indian  states where the literacy rate is near one hundred per cent and yet it  ranks well below in economic development and employment. This  problem is visible in most developed countries too, where higher  education is relatively unaffordable to most of the population.  

Tailpiece

Education is about knowing your skills, abilities and learning, and then  using them in the right place at the right time, to produce something  useful. Educational institutions can make all the students literate but  cannot make all of them educated. Individual contribution to self-education is paramount. Education changes a person as a whole.  Educated people understand their responsibilities towards the society and  country. As a corollary, university degrees etc. are not essential for  gathering knowledge. It is time we recognise a person’s skills and  contribution to building a society and not be enamoured only by the  appended degrees trailing her name.   

These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.