File photo of Bernie Sanders
File photo of Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders | Facebook
Text Size:

New Delhi: The seemingly innocuous preference for Indian food by American voters could have high stakes for candidates in the running for US President.

The latest New York Times/Siena College poll of 584 pro-Democrat voters from Iowa caucuses — considered the first major contest of the presidential primary season — found that asking pollsters “non-political” questions could actually reveal quite a lot about their political positions.

The relationship between Indian food and candidate choice proved to be a distinguishing predictor, the survey said.

Those voting for Democrat candidates Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren are more likely to have eaten Indian food in the last 10 years than those voting for Joe Biden or Pete Buttigieg, it said.

Sanders is at the forefront here: 71 per cent of his voters have been to an Indian restaurant in the last 10 years, after accounting for factors like age, gender, and race.

“A voter’s orientation toward the world is related to candidate choice, and it turns out that eating in restaurants that celebrate less familiar cultures is one way to measure where people think they are more connected: to those around them locally or to people farther afield,” wrote political scientist Lynn Vavrek, who analysed the poll, Thursday.

US voters and Indian food

Vavrek’s analysis revealed that there were no discernible differences in responses when it came to other “non-political” questions, like the importance of buying organic food, using Twitter to check political news, or watching TV shows on premium outlets. Most people, regardless of their candidate of choice, responded similarly. The question on Indian food in the survey is where the differences became most stark.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.


Indian food and other “world oriented” questions have a history of predicting voter allegiances.

In 2008, Indian food became an indicator of who would vote for former US president Barack Obama versus who would vote for his rival Hilary Clinton. “The more likely that people were to experience other cultures probably unfamiliar to them — through travel or food — the more likely they were to vote for Mr. Obama, even controlling for things like income, education, personality, racial attitudes and city living,” said Vavrek. Ditto for those who did or didn’t vote for US President Donald Trump in 2016.

A survey by food delivery service Grubhub revealed in 2016 that there was a correlation between the politics of an area and food dish preference. The “most Republican foods” were sweet and sour chicken and cannoli, whereas chicken vindaloo and massaman curry were among the “most Democrat foods”.

Counter-intuitive predictors of politics

There are other similar correlations too. In 2019, the Atlantic wrote that Republicans and Democrats had “wildly” different reactions to repulsive photos.

“Our political beliefs may derive from a specific aspect of our biological makeup: our propensity to feel physical revulsion,” it wrote.

Also read: Socialism may just be what the service economy needs


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

Share Your Views


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here