New Delhi: The Rajya Sabha Tuesday passed a bill that allows abortion for up to 24 weeks “for special categories of women”, from the existing gestation period of 20 weeks.
The bill amends the current Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, which states that abortion within 12 weeks requires the opinion of one doctor and between 12 to 20 weeks will require the opinion of two doctors.
The new bill, however, amends these requirements and states that a single doctor’s opinion will be required to get an abortion within 20 weeks and two doctors will be required to give their assent for an abortion between 20 and 24 weeks for “certain categories of women”.
Following the passage of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Bill, Health Minister Harsh Vardhan had tweeted: “The bill will protect the dignity and rights of women.”
ThePrint explains the MTP (Amendment) Bill, why it was changed and what experts have to say about it.
Changes to abortion bill
According to the new bill, abortion can take place in cases where the pregnancy exceeds 20 weeks if the pregnancy involves risk of life to the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or mental health, or there is a substantial risk that if the baby is born, he or she will suffer from serious physical or mental disabilities.
The bill elucidates two situations that will constitute these categories:
First, the “pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method used by any woman or her partner for the purpose of limiting the number of children or preventing pregnancy”. Such cases are to be presumed as causing grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.
Second, “where any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman”.
Moreover, in cases where an abortion is necessary beyond 24 weeks because a foetus has been diagnosed with substantial abnormalities, a medical board is required to preside over the matter.
Controversies around the Act
The MTP Act was enacted in 1971, as an exception to the Indian Penal Code, which states that terminating a pregnancy is a criminal offence.
In the past few years, however, several writ petitions had been filed in the Supreme Court and various high courts seeking permission to terminate pregnancies beyond the 20-week gestational period.
According to a report by the Pratigya Campaign for Gender Equality & Safe Abortion — a network of individuals and organisations that have been working towards women’s access to safe abortion care in India — between 2016 and 2019, the Supreme Court and the high courts of India had seen a total of 194 petitions from women seeking abortions.
“The Act does not adequately recognise the social and economic implications of unwanted pregnancies and their impact on women,” the report noted.
In 2014, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare had also sought to bring amendments to some of the provisions of the Act.
This had, however, led to a controversy as one of the proposed amendment expanded the definition of legal abortion providers to include trained nurses, auxiliary nurse-midwives (ANMs) and doctors practising Ayurveda, Homeopathy, Unani and Siddha.
The amendment was removed by the ministry and the present bill passed by the Rajya Sabha does not change the definition of legal abortion providers.
Welcoming the passage of the Bill, Dr Nandita Palshetkar, the immediate past president of the Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI) told ThePrint: “We’ve been asking for it for a long time and [there has been] a lot of back and forth with the government and they finally understood that in our country, there are certain areas where abnormalities cannot be predicted early by ultrasound.”
“What happens is that access to the ultrasound is not there in urban and rural areas, so those who are missing that boat, it can now be caught … and the heart 2D ECHO (ultrasound of the heart) of the foetus is better at 20-24 weeks,” she added.
(Edited by Rachel John)