The Delhi HC judge, known for 'bold pronouncements', is at the heart of the latest row in the judiciary as proposals to transfer him have been stalled.
The political trajectory is clear. Asim Munir is now prepared to convict and sentence Imran Khan for instigating a rebellion against the army chief, with no possibility of mercy.
RBI data shows 26 states and Union Territories couldn’t regain pre-pandemic foreign tourist footfalls in 2024, but domestic tourism surged 27 percent compared to 2019.
Of the total package, $649 million will be utilised for additional hardware, software, and support services, and the remaining for Major Defence Equipment (MDE).
None of Pakistan’s PMs has lasted 5 years. That the current PM has given Asim Munir 5 years shows that of all military dictatorships history has seen, Pakistan’s is most creative.
Justice muralidhar is one of very few judges left who have conscience and integrity. His judgments peak for themselves he has never been biased to any political ideology and his decisions have equally affected almost all the political parties.
Justice Muralidhar is a biased judge and that says it all. If you’re in the higher echelons of the judiciary, you cannot be constantly influenced by activists who jaundice your vision. Justice Muralidhar’s judgements and clearly visual biases prove that he is unfit to be a judge. He should have been a judge during the Emergency, fighting against the basic freedoms of the people of India and for a morally corrupt head of government. In his attempt to kowtow to the people who want to destroy India, he betrays India and all its citizend. Who needs such a justice?
Being unbiased in cases where one side is powerful and the other side is disadvantaged, is wrong? What is your logic? Justice Murlidhar has in fact protected the real Indias, against the criminals. He is the nationalist in a true sense.
With due respect, J Muralidhar is amongst the poorest judges on the bench. A judge must be free from emotion & fair. J Muralidhar has given some shocking judgments, which make headlines & sound good but are very wrong in law.
Justice Muralidaran is a blot on justice. One wonders how he made it to the Bench. A Commie in a black robe, should be impeached post haste.
Justice muralidhar is one of very few judges left who have conscience and integrity. His judgments peak for themselves he has never been biased to any political ideology and his decisions have equally affected almost all the political parties.
Justice Muralidhar is a biased judge and that says it all. If you’re in the higher echelons of the judiciary, you cannot be constantly influenced by activists who jaundice your vision. Justice Muralidhar’s judgements and clearly visual biases prove that he is unfit to be a judge. He should have been a judge during the Emergency, fighting against the basic freedoms of the people of India and for a morally corrupt head of government. In his attempt to kowtow to the people who want to destroy India, he betrays India and all its citizend. Who needs such a justice?
Being unbiased in cases where one side is powerful and the other side is disadvantaged, is wrong? What is your logic? Justice Murlidhar has in fact protected the real Indias, against the criminals. He is the nationalist in a true sense.
With due respect, J Muralidhar is amongst the poorest judges on the bench. A judge must be free from emotion & fair. J Muralidhar has given some shocking judgments, which make headlines & sound good but are very wrong in law.
For example? Give some references to the cases?