While the present moment belongs to China, the next two decades can belong to India, provided we are ready to pursue bi-partisanship and take bold decisions.
In Episode 1544 of CutTheClutter, Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta looks at some top economists pointing to the pitfalls of ‘currency nationalism’ with data from 1991 to 2004.
The decorated Naga officer from Manipur also served as envoy to Myanmar & Nagaland chief secy. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh inaugurated a museum dedicated to the Tawang hero Thursday.
Congress is silently acknowledging it over-read verdict of last general election. You can see it in easy concession to SP. It will likely be more reasonable in Maharashtra & Jharkhand.
This author does not have any guilt on the deeds of his ancestors who destroyed one of the most holy places of Hindus and shamelessly erected a so called Mosque.
Archeological survey report, vetted by supreme court has clearly stated, with proofs that temple existed. What is the author trying to argue? There is no debate. The author does not even mention the report even once in his article and in last paragraph he does not even mentions that it has been clearly proved that temple existed prior.
Good Article: Now answer this question. Why Muslims did not show any interest to reclaim their so called functioning mosque from 1949 to 1986. Why the secularest of the secular Chacha Nehru did not remove the illegally placed idols during this unchallenged reign from 1949 to 1964.
This author does not have any guilt on the deeds of his ancestors who destroyed one of the most holy places of Hindus and shamelessly erected a so called Mosque.
The facts are wrong.
Archeological survey report, vetted by supreme court has clearly stated, with proofs that temple existed. What is the author trying to argue? There is no debate. The author does not even mention the report even once in his article and in last paragraph he does not even mentions that it has been clearly proved that temple existed prior.
Good Article: Now answer this question. Why Muslims did not show any interest to reclaim their so called functioning mosque from 1949 to 1986. Why the secularest of the secular Chacha Nehru did not remove the illegally placed idols during this unchallenged reign from 1949 to 1964.
Well argued article. The author’s view always provide a new insight on political matter in India. I completely agree with the view expressed here.