Another pressing issue plaguing the disability sector in India is the absence of proactive initiatives from state governments. This is despite disability being a state subject.
Indians aged 20-30 are trading in options market in droves, but know nothing about it & so keep losing money. If losses mount, it could undo gains India saw in investment culture, analysts fear.
Chiman Singh, injured in 1971 India-Pakistan war, was discharged as non-pensioner in 1972. In his petition, he states denial of pension is contrary to settled law.
Even in the weeks leading up to Chamkila’s assassination there were massacres every other day. To airbrush all of this is sheer intellectual cowardice if not a crime.
The moment a journalist thinks of himself as the newsmaker ,bigger than the news itself, becim s highly opinionated and pretends to know the secrets ,befriends politicians,hobnobs with them, I begin to be cautious. It is a disservice to the profession he is in and to the job in hand as merely the carrier of news as known . Rest is all views and opinions which matter least. Karan is often known to attack the guests with a barrage of innuendos that have no basis other than in his own mind. Is he presenting C&A programmes as ‘Shows’, questions and his own posturing as entertainment ? That is deplorable too. In the history of the society, it is known that political and hide,tell lies,mislead and boast .So are th interviewers like Karan Thapar. If fwrreting out the Truth is the ultimate aim, it cannot be found f I’m a comfortable chair. Politicians are scoundrels and are pastmasters at manipulating any and every smartalec C&A anchor. A newsman’s job is to be publish news,debate with h the public whom it impacts and alters his living,even thretens in several ways. Why write a personal memoir ? Who are you ? To earn money from the sales by peddling gossip and more gossip nodoubt. Better to forge Karan Thapar. His memoir will add itself to the pile of waste glorifi d journalist write what thought ever a dust from the street ever clinging to th underside of their expensive shiny shoes. Not to mention suit-boot-ties worn be the wrong men in the wrong weather. Seasoned BBC reporters dig it first hand in the field until their hair turns grey and quietly pass,a duty to inform done and done well. They are all aware that no one is obliged, it is a duty. Karan has gotten away too far, too long.
It is outlandish to expect that the memoirs of interviewers, anchors and reporters are epic and going to make the world a better place to live. MR. Thapar wrote what he remembered and what he thought was dear to him.
It is not readers’ right to expect him to write in the way they want him to write. He or any author can be selective, partisan, objective, or even noble in his writing, deliberately or otherwise. However, it is readers’ right to accept or reject the book. That is supreme and it is guaranteed by readers’ Constitution.
Not worth reading.
The moment a journalist thinks of himself as the newsmaker ,bigger than the news itself, becim s highly opinionated and pretends to know the secrets ,befriends politicians,hobnobs with them, I begin to be cautious. It is a disservice to the profession he is in and to the job in hand as merely the carrier of news as known . Rest is all views and opinions which matter least. Karan is often known to attack the guests with a barrage of innuendos that have no basis other than in his own mind. Is he presenting C&A programmes as ‘Shows’, questions and his own posturing as entertainment ? That is deplorable too. In the history of the society, it is known that political and hide,tell lies,mislead and boast .So are th interviewers like Karan Thapar. If fwrreting out the Truth is the ultimate aim, it cannot be found f I’m a comfortable chair. Politicians are scoundrels and are pastmasters at manipulating any and every smartalec C&A anchor. A newsman’s job is to be publish news,debate with h the public whom it impacts and alters his living,even thretens in several ways. Why write a personal memoir ? Who are you ? To earn money from the sales by peddling gossip and more gossip nodoubt. Better to forge Karan Thapar. His memoir will add itself to the pile of waste glorifi d journalist write what thought ever a dust from the street ever clinging to th underside of their expensive shiny shoes. Not to mention suit-boot-ties worn be the wrong men in the wrong weather. Seasoned BBC reporters dig it first hand in the field until their hair turns grey and quietly pass,a duty to inform done and done well. They are all aware that no one is obliged, it is a duty. Karan has gotten away too far, too long.
It is outlandish to expect that the memoirs of interviewers, anchors and reporters are epic and going to make the world a better place to live. MR. Thapar wrote what he remembered and what he thought was dear to him.
It is not readers’ right to expect him to write in the way they want him to write. He or any author can be selective, partisan, objective, or even noble in his writing, deliberately or otherwise. However, it is readers’ right to accept or reject the book. That is supreme and it is guaranteed by readers’ Constitution.
Absolutely right
Memoirs, by nature, provide opportunities to authors to express vain
I am waiting for Shri Shekhar Gupta’s memoirs, written at an age when he fears neither the outrage of friends nor the wrath of the other group …