The Supreme Court last Tuesday urged the parties in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case to give another shot to an out-of-court settlement.
A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by incumbent CJI Ranjan Gogoi, will begin hearing the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit Thursday.
The IndiGo crisis is nothing short of a threat to India’s stability. Could it be an experiment? Can this happen in any other crucial sector like power or railways?
RBI Handbook of Statistics shows state’s GSDP has more than doubled in past decade, finishing second behind Maharashtra. It has performed well across health & education parameters as well.
It is argued that India-Israel ties are moving from buyer–seller dynamic to one focused on joint development & manufacturing partnership, a shift 'more durable' than traditional arms sales.
Don’t blame misfortune. This is colossal incompetence and insensitivity. So bad, heads would have rolled even in the old PSU-era Indian Airlines and Air India.
Let me share an incident happen at Hubli Karnataka, There was a controversy over the flag hoisting at Idgah Maidan, the land was claimed by Anjuman-e-Islam, and BJP wanted to hoist National Flag on 15th Aug. This conflict was gaining on for more than decade
It was non Issue, BJP tried to make electoral gain. Present Minister of the Parliamentary Affairs Mr Pralhad Joshi, Ms Uma Bharati all descended on Hubli in 1994, their were riots, many people died except the leaders.
Mr H. D. Deve Gowda, then Chief Minister, solved it intelligently convinced Anjuman-e-Islam to hoist flag in 1995
Alas, post that all our patriotic leaders lost interest in national flag hoisting at Idga Maidan. They just vanished from that year onwards. In last two decade none of BJP leader were present for national flag hoisting at Idgah Maidan
Let All India Babri Masjid Action Committee (AIBMAC) build temple, I am sure all So called Ram Bhakt will lose interest in Ram & his janmabhoomi
When transfer of Power from British to congress happened in 47 the Divide and rule policy was also one instrument congress received. Illiterate Muslim was one vote bank which was readily available as educated class went to Pak. To make them afraid was a guarantee that they vote in mass to congress hence issues like Ayodhya was and is deliberately left unresolved so that Muslim keep voting without asking anything back to Congress. Another piece missing in this plan was a voilent Hindu who could create fear among Muslims. So extreme elements among Hindu were Patronized and terms like Hindu terror invented. Patel resolved Somnath issue but Nehru wanted Ayodhya to linger on as a gurantee to power for his coming generations.
The proof of this is available around you as Sibbal, Arif Mhd Khan remarks
An argumentative Muslim should ask him, Sir, what should we do when the NRC Inspectors drop by and ask us for our identity papers, going back three generations.
What does the good general feel about how the site was cleared, for future use. What assurances can he give his community that this was a one – off and that relations between the two communities are now immeasurably better.
Let me share an incident happen at Hubli Karnataka, There was a controversy over the flag hoisting at Idgah Maidan, the land was claimed by Anjuman-e-Islam, and BJP wanted to hoist National Flag on 15th Aug. This conflict was gaining on for more than decade
It was non Issue, BJP tried to make electoral gain. Present Minister of the Parliamentary Affairs Mr Pralhad Joshi, Ms Uma Bharati all descended on Hubli in 1994, their were riots, many people died except the leaders.
Mr H. D. Deve Gowda, then Chief Minister, solved it intelligently convinced Anjuman-e-Islam to hoist flag in 1995
Alas, post that all our patriotic leaders lost interest in national flag hoisting at Idga Maidan. They just vanished from that year onwards. In last two decade none of BJP leader were present for national flag hoisting at Idgah Maidan
Let All India Babri Masjid Action Committee (AIBMAC) build temple, I am sure all So called Ram Bhakt will lose interest in Ram & his janmabhoomi
When transfer of Power from British to congress happened in 47 the Divide and rule policy was also one instrument congress received. Illiterate Muslim was one vote bank which was readily available as educated class went to Pak. To make them afraid was a guarantee that they vote in mass to congress hence issues like Ayodhya was and is deliberately left unresolved so that Muslim keep voting without asking anything back to Congress. Another piece missing in this plan was a voilent Hindu who could create fear among Muslims. So extreme elements among Hindu were Patronized and terms like Hindu terror invented. Patel resolved Somnath issue but Nehru wanted Ayodhya to linger on as a gurantee to power for his coming generations.
The proof of this is available around you as Sibbal, Arif Mhd Khan remarks
An argumentative Muslim should ask him, Sir, what should we do when the NRC Inspectors drop by and ask us for our identity papers, going back three generations.
What does the good general feel about how the site was cleared, for future use. What assurances can he give his community that this was a one – off and that relations between the two communities are now immeasurably better.
No one individual can speak on so significant an issue and expect his entire community to heed his advice. Let the courts decide.