From Sam Pitroda talking about inheritance tax to Goan candidate saying the Indian Constitution was 'forced' on Goa, Congress has been having its own foot-in-the-mouth moments.
Speaking at launch of economist Surjit Bhalla’s book, S Jaishankar also highlights Gen Z’s engagement with ‘reel culture’, which has 'promoted awareness, created interest in many subjects'.
The announcement, made by JeM’s Maktab-ul-Rabita, or office for communication, comes 2 yrs after Pakistani officials claimed the militant was living under Taliban protection.
I don’t agree with this flawed logic, by this logic 90% of media editors are stooges of Cong and Left owing to their spouses relationship with these parties
BJP’s connection is more than incidental, as you rightly point out. I will add just one bit of speculation: some months back, Anupam Kher resigned from FTII saying that he had to finish some urgent assignments. I think this movie was that urgency, though he said something about some commitments in the USA I think.
You have just taken a position on a film. This position is courageous. But you do not ask yourself the essential question. A few months of important elections and without taking a stand on the subject of the film, should we not ask ourselves whether equal treatment between parties is respected? Is not there an institutional vacuum? Or should the body that is supposed to enforce the election rules not come forward? The intellectuals for whom you have published a glowing article are very silent.But maybe we need to legislate if there is a legal void,
I don’t agree with this flawed logic, by this logic 90% of media editors are stooges of Cong and Left owing to their spouses relationship with these parties
BJP’s connection is more than incidental, as you rightly point out. I will add just one bit of speculation: some months back, Anupam Kher resigned from FTII saying that he had to finish some urgent assignments. I think this movie was that urgency, though he said something about some commitments in the USA I think.
You have just taken a position on a film. This position is courageous. But you do not ask yourself the essential question. A few months of important elections and without taking a stand on the subject of the film, should we not ask ourselves whether equal treatment between parties is respected? Is not there an institutional vacuum? Or should the body that is supposed to enforce the election rules not come forward? The intellectuals for whom you have published a glowing article are very silent.But maybe we need to legislate if there is a legal void,