Rao Friday tweeted that Swami Agnivesh was an ‘anti-Hindu donning saffron clothes’. Agnivesh died Friday after a multiple-organ failure and cardiac arrest.
A 1986-batch IPS officer, M. Nageshwar Rao has allegedly influenced probes in CBI, misappropriated funds while in office & transferred officers despite SC order.
Additional director Nageshwar Rao, who has been appointed interim CBI chief, cancelled the transfer orders issued by former director Verma during his one-day tenure.
The reach and impact of influencers are so significant that even politicians such as Prime Minister Narendra Modi have recognised their value—the National Creators Award is proof.
Economists say there are weaknesses in India’s GDP data. But statisticians claim the accusations are based on flawed understanding, saying while GDP has problems, the economists are looking in the wrong places.
Coaching centres for Army aspirants in Jhunjhunu are shutting down due to plummeting admissions in the face of a lack of job guarantees under Agnipath Scheme.
Agnivesh insulted and mocked hindu dhaarmik beliefs. He had mocked at amarnath, pashupatinath, sabrimala, tirupati, mahabharat and termed it as pakhand. He violated the constitutional freedom of religious beliefs of hindus in the guise of freedom of speech. If according to him hindus dhaarmik beliefs are fake and pakhand then should hindus stop worshipping their deities, should hindus borrow religious beliefs from abhrahmic religions. Did he mean to say that hindus belief are bakwaas and so they should give up such beliefs. By saying so didn’t he deny the freedom of religious beliefs to hindus provided under constitution. By insulting and mocking hindus religious beliefs what he wanted to achieve. His freedom of speech insulting hindus beliefs was just for sake of criticism or he wanted hindus to borrow religious beliefs or was it his agenda of proselytizing. What could be his intention,we need to look into it. Was he agent of conversion lobby to insult hindus beliefs so that hindus may give up their dharm. It seems to be so because when he had nothing to say about religious beliefs of abrahmic then it was certainly his agenda to facilitate conversion of hindus to abrahmic religions. Those who support his so-called freedom of speech and his so-called liberal views, are actually hindu haters. He and his ilk are the persons who had sown the seeds of hatred against hindus and they cant blame hindus for present so-called hate environment.
Of all people , Irfan Habib , a rabid communalist and anti-Hindu historian, has the gumption to speak on this issue. This cabal of so called liberals has to be exposed at all levels, especially in front of our younger generation, so that further distortion of our history does not take place. Irfan Habib was at the forefront , under the Congress regimes at centre, when our true history was being hidden from us and a false narrative was being spread. Of course he will be pained at the comments made against so called ‘Swami’, who was worse than many Jehadis in denigrating the Hindus, Hinduism and Hindutva.
Rao’s comments are crass, disgraceful and in bad taste. He is also a disgrace to the IPS. Thanks to the posting of incompetent and corrupt officers like him, institutions like the CBI – once headed by the finest in the IPS – have now fallen into disrepute.
Agnivesh insulted and mocked hindu dhaarmik beliefs. He had mocked at amarnath, pashupatinath, sabrimala, tirupati, mahabharat and termed it as pakhand. He violated the constitutional freedom of religious beliefs of hindus in the guise of freedom of speech. If according to him hindus dhaarmik beliefs are fake and pakhand then should hindus stop worshipping their deities, should hindus borrow religious beliefs from abhrahmic religions. Did he mean to say that hindus belief are bakwaas and so they should give up such beliefs. By saying so didn’t he deny the freedom of religious beliefs to hindus provided under constitution. By insulting and mocking hindus religious beliefs what he wanted to achieve. His freedom of speech insulting hindus beliefs was just for sake of criticism or he wanted hindus to borrow religious beliefs or was it his agenda of proselytizing. What could be his intention,we need to look into it. Was he agent of conversion lobby to insult hindus beliefs so that hindus may give up their dharm. It seems to be so because when he had nothing to say about religious beliefs of abrahmic then it was certainly his agenda to facilitate conversion of hindus to abrahmic religions. Those who support his so-called freedom of speech and his so-called liberal views, are actually hindu haters. He and his ilk are the persons who had sown the seeds of hatred against hindus and they cant blame hindus for present so-called hate environment.
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/agnivesh-does-a-volteface/article5948633.ece
Agnivesh ko Azaadi milgaya!!
I am so ashamed that such bigots headed the premier Indian investigating agency, CBI. Is he fit to be called an Indian?
Of all people , Irfan Habib , a rabid communalist and anti-Hindu historian, has the gumption to speak on this issue. This cabal of so called liberals has to be exposed at all levels, especially in front of our younger generation, so that further distortion of our history does not take place. Irfan Habib was at the forefront , under the Congress regimes at centre, when our true history was being hidden from us and a false narrative was being spread. Of course he will be pained at the comments made against so called ‘Swami’, who was worse than many Jehadis in denigrating the Hindus, Hinduism and Hindutva.
Kitna zulm kiya UPSC ne aise aadmi – insaan nahin keh sakte – ko chun kar. Let loose on the Indian public for a lifetime.
Rao’s comments are crass, disgraceful and in bad taste. He is also a disgrace to the IPS. Thanks to the posting of incompetent and corrupt officers like him, institutions like the CBI – once headed by the finest in the IPS – have now fallen into disrepute.