Air India’s new policy, effective from 2 May, introduces new weight limits for tickets in each of the different 'fare families' — Comfort, Comfort Plus, and Flex.
New Delhi has, in past, too, objected to Chinese construction activities in Shaksgam Valley. Work in this strategic region gathered pace after the 2017 Doklam stand-off.
A theme has not yet emerged for BJP & people see lack of a contest, which makes it unexciting. For all these reasons, 2024 is turning out to be an unexpectedly theme-less election.
Manu is from the Coupta school of disinformation. Cannot expect any better in terms of the coverage or understanding of finer aspects of product development.
Manu, it may be a waste of my time trying this, but as a simple exercise in journalistic integrity, have you researched the typical number of failures in interceptor missiles? Iron dome for example (since you may want to use Google with a specific keyword, just for a start).
Couptaji, two and a half decades later, you are still a peddler and a survivor. Here’s to our days of rum on a charpoy in rural Punjab. Kudos.
Does any one in “The Print” know even the basics of system development and systems engineering? I wonder where these authors come up with such foolish and outlandish conclusion as reflected in its head line that Indian missile development is going through a rough patch. The other day the venerable Mr.Gupta came up with the story of non delivering empire of Kalam too. If nobody, seriously, over at the print know even the basics of engineering, one could just go through that often quoted and misquoted saying of Edison regarding the trials and tribulations of discovering the suitable filament for light bulb. FYI print: NO SYSTEM IS BOUND TO SUCCEED FROM THE GET GO. IF SO THERE IS NO NEED FOR TESTING AT ALL. TESTING IS TO FIND OUT THE KINKS AND RECTIFY IT, AS NO AMOUNT OF SIMULATION IS EQUAL TO A REAL FLIGHT. A FAILURE OR TWO IS A SAMPLE POINT ON A SERIES OF TESTS NOR THE TREND AND NOT EVEN REMOTELY THE RESULT. Or I suspect the people at print are fully aware of the above fact and peddeling the biased half truths to the benefit of somebody??
Manu is from the Coupta school of disinformation. Cannot expect any better in terms of the coverage or understanding of finer aspects of product development.
Manu, it may be a waste of my time trying this, but as a simple exercise in journalistic integrity, have you researched the typical number of failures in interceptor missiles? Iron dome for example (since you may want to use Google with a specific keyword, just for a start).
Couptaji, two and a half decades later, you are still a peddler and a survivor. Here’s to our days of rum on a charpoy in rural Punjab. Kudos.
Does any one in “The Print” know even the basics of system development and systems engineering? I wonder where these authors come up with such foolish and outlandish conclusion as reflected in its head line that Indian missile development is going through a rough patch. The other day the venerable Mr.Gupta came up with the story of non delivering empire of Kalam too. If nobody, seriously, over at the print know even the basics of engineering, one could just go through that often quoted and misquoted saying of Edison regarding the trials and tribulations of discovering the suitable filament for light bulb. FYI print: NO SYSTEM IS BOUND TO SUCCEED FROM THE GET GO. IF SO THERE IS NO NEED FOR TESTING AT ALL. TESTING IS TO FIND OUT THE KINKS AND RECTIFY IT, AS NO AMOUNT OF SIMULATION IS EQUAL TO A REAL FLIGHT. A FAILURE OR TWO IS A SAMPLE POINT ON A SERIES OF TESTS NOR THE TREND AND NOT EVEN REMOTELY THE RESULT. Or I suspect the people at print are fully aware of the above fact and peddeling the biased half truths to the benefit of somebody??