We are looking at clothing that can sustain soldiers in extreme cold climate & hot weather and the north-eastern regions where we have the jungle and semi-mountainous, Rawat said.
Modi govt's capital budget allocation for 2021-22 is lower than the amount armed forces had sought in 2014-15. But spending more is not the answer, spending right is.
So far, vice-chiefs of Army, Navy, and deputy chief of air staff were the competent financial authority for capital procurements of up to Rs 300 crore.
Reeling under acute financial crunch, the Indian armed forces expect increased allocation to meet their modernisation plans. The Modi government must deliver.
A multi-billion-dollar process for armed forces' modernisation is currently underway. India's political class must deliver and not carry on with the piecemeal approach.
Pentagon says the proposed sale ensures previously procured fleet of C-130J Super Hercules military transport aircraft operates to serve India's civil and military needs.
Procurement procedures in the armed forces are near perfect. So if sub-standard equipment pass through, it's either because the leadership is corrupt or it is incompetent.
Trump’s OBBB is framed to augment domestic semiconductor production and enhance trade protection, even at the expense of certain social programs such as Medicaid, food stamps, and student loans, as well as a projected ballooning federal deficit from US$2.8 to 3.3 trillion
New bill aims to fix key issues with IBC 2016, including delays & patchy implementation, and protect creditors, with window for genuine promoters to retain control of their companies.
Billed as the military’s own version of Raisina Dialogue, the event will spotlight on tech-driven warfighting, lessons from Operation Sindoor and release of three new doctrines.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
But age bar is the second foremost issue is government takes entry on technical quota from 21 to 27 so why don’t army means non technical should be able to apply till at least 27 years of age.
The good general has advanced flawless military logic.
Fitness need not be gender specific but task related.
Tasks। Could be related to age and length of service.
Any one , irrespective of gender, should be able to display required standard of physical fitness.
Those not meeting the criteria should be declared medically unfit till they prove their fitness.All sports persons have similar requirements.Where is disparity?
With due respect sir, I agree with you that for soldiering one should fulfill all the criterias without failing whether a male or a female. But I really fail to understand why to prove herself one has to be compared with males. Why do we talk “at par with males”? Why male traits and strengths are fixed as pedestal and everything else is compared to that. There should be a standard criteria which male and female both must fulfill without compromising requirements of a soldier !!! Warriors aren’t made of their gender. They’re made of their spirit and courage. If u compare men to women/women to men…you’ll definitely witness “natural difference “. So requirements shouldn’t be fixed by keeping only one gender in mind.
But age bar is the second foremost issue is government takes entry on technical quota from 21 to 27 so why don’t army means non technical should be able to apply till at least 27 years of age.
The good general has advanced flawless military logic.
Fitness need not be gender specific but task related.
Tasks। Could be related to age and length of service.
Any one , irrespective of gender, should be able to display required standard of physical fitness.
Those not meeting the criteria should be declared medically unfit till they prove their fitness.All sports persons have similar requirements.Where is disparity?
With due respect sir, I agree with you that for soldiering one should fulfill all the criterias without failing whether a male or a female. But I really fail to understand why to prove herself one has to be compared with males. Why do we talk “at par with males”? Why male traits and strengths are fixed as pedestal and everything else is compared to that. There should be a standard criteria which male and female both must fulfill without compromising requirements of a soldier !!! Warriors aren’t made of their gender. They’re made of their spirit and courage. If u compare men to women/women to men…you’ll definitely witness “natural difference “. So requirements shouldn’t be fixed by keeping only one gender in mind.
Dear mam,
Battles are not fought based on genders. Physical endurance has to be on par with the troops ou lead.
Send a few women into combat. When there are casualties see the 180° turn everyone takes then.