The considerable weight of claims about Aurangzeb’s religious tolerance rest heavily on one obscure scholar's writings. We know him merely as 'Jnan Chandra, Bombay.'
Tipu Sultan is remembered as the Indian ruler who died fighting the British and did not take a pension. But that does not automatically make him a patriot.
Research paper, however, finds lowest indebtedness level among Muslims at 12.3% & highest among Hindus at 14.9%. Overall national financial inclusion level at 87.2%, indebtedness at 14.7%.
Fresh details of operation conducted by IAF, Army have come out in gazette notification giving citations of those who were awarded Vir Chakra for their bravery.
On 21 Oct, a buzz went up that the govt had released full list of gallantry award recipients along with Op Sindoor citations. I put an AI caddy on the job. It took me into a never-ending rabbit hole.
Our article has numerous links to historical sources that are available on the Internet. No one should take anything we write on trust – instead. follow the links, read original sources and decide for yourself whether what we say is accurate or not. If you find a mistake, let us know and we will correct it. If you believe we have cherry-picked our facts, tell us what we have omitted and we will consider your evidence. We need to adopt a more scientific approach to the study of our own history rather than letting other people tell us who we were.
At last some credible counter to Audrey Trushcke’s distoriography and white washing of 4.2 million Hindu genocide by Alamgir. The hate for the heathen runs deep in certain foreign and HINO “Indologists”. Dhanyavād to the authors.
PLEASE READ
AURANGZEB & TIPU SULTAN
EVALUATION OF THEIR RELIGIOUS POLICIES
BY
Dr BISHAMBAR NATH PANDE
( B.N.PANDE )
GENUINE PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTD
AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
THEN DECIDE
PLEASE DON’T MISLEAD WITH HALF INFO
Thank you for this counter to an orchestrated and well financed campaign to whitewash the attempted destruction of Hindu civilization. The writers may not be peer-reviewed historians but are certainly not quacks as claimed by one detractor below who conveniently sidesteps the evidence presented. Many a so called “historian” is in fact a partisan political activist.
This is an excellent expose of how academia is subverted and politicized. The end goal is to mainstream Islamist revisionism. We need to be alert to the intellectual dishonesty and negationism behind efforts to rehabilitate Aurangzeb.
There’s Dr Ruchika Sharma, teacher and historian based in Delhi, who is of the opinion that Emperor Aurangzeb took action to quell rebellion against the country, and carried out the needful, even demolishing temple if warranted. He has issued several farmans – royal orders – granting lands and money for the building and maintenance of temples, and those farmans are well-preserved in those temples as well as museums. Islamophobic historians cannot tear down history with their venomous rant – it only goes to prove that these people are not historians.
Well written
Our article has numerous links to historical sources that are available on the Internet. No one should take anything we write on trust – instead. follow the links, read original sources and decide for yourself whether what we say is accurate or not. If you find a mistake, let us know and we will correct it. If you believe we have cherry-picked our facts, tell us what we have omitted and we will consider your evidence. We need to adopt a more scientific approach to the study of our own history rather than letting other people tell us who we were.
At last some credible counter to Audrey Trushcke’s distoriography and white washing of 4.2 million Hindu genocide by Alamgir. The hate for the heathen runs deep in certain foreign and HINO “Indologists”. Dhanyavād to the authors.
PLEASE READ
AURANGZEB & TIPU SULTAN
EVALUATION OF THEIR RELIGIOUS POLICIES
BY
Dr BISHAMBAR NATH PANDE
( B.N.PANDE )
GENUINE PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTD
AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
THEN DECIDE
PLEASE DON’T MISLEAD WITH HALF INFO
Thank you for this counter to an orchestrated and well financed campaign to whitewash the attempted destruction of Hindu civilization. The writers may not be peer-reviewed historians but are certainly not quacks as claimed by one detractor below who conveniently sidesteps the evidence presented. Many a so called “historian” is in fact a partisan political activist.
None of the authors of this essay are historians. Do we trust quacks over trained doctors in matters of critical medicine?
Just asking
The Print redemption arc???
This is an excellent expose of how academia is subverted and politicized. The end goal is to mainstream Islamist revisionism. We need to be alert to the intellectual dishonesty and negationism behind efforts to rehabilitate Aurangzeb.
There’s Dr Ruchika Sharma, teacher and historian based in Delhi, who is of the opinion that Emperor Aurangzeb took action to quell rebellion against the country, and carried out the needful, even demolishing temple if warranted. He has issued several farmans – royal orders – granting lands and money for the building and maintenance of temples, and those farmans are well-preserved in those temples as well as museums. Islamophobic historians cannot tear down history with their venomous rant – it only goes to prove that these people are not historians.