The more you hide the ugly side and write a biased view in favour of the Mughals, the more chances are hating them when the unsaid truth is revealed. The best is, write both the bright and dark sides of them and leave the judgement to the readers. This article is heavily biased on one side. I must say, a lot of sugar coating has been done to the poison pill. It may not be clever to think that in this era of internet and AI, one can hide ugly truths. Yes, Mughals have some positive aspects of their rule, people will accept them only when an honest account of them is told. For a period, a bygone period at that, it was a fashion to elevate the Mughal rule above all dynasties that ruled Bharat for several millennia since pre-historic times. I advice the writer, for a change, to research the chronicles of Islamic historians, chroniclers, biographers and bring out some unsavoury truths also. After all they are also facts, not the fiction written by Hindi fundamentalists.
The more you hide the ugly side and write a biased view in favour of the Mughals, the more chances are hating them when the unsaid truth is revealed. The best is, write both the bright and dark sides of them and leave the judgement to the readers. This article is heavily biased on one side. I must say, a lot of sugar coating has been done to the poison pill. It may not be clever to think that in this era of internet and AI, one can hide ugly truths. Yes, Mughals have some positive aspects of their rule, people will accept them only when an honest account of them is told. For a period, a bygone period at that, it was a fashion to elevate the Mughal rule above all dynasties that ruled Bharat for several millennia since pre-historic times. I advice the writer, for a change, to research the chronicles of Islamic historians, chroniclers, biographers and bring out some unsavoury truths also. After all they are also facts, not the fiction written by Hindi fundamentalists.