Kashmir: Exposing the Myth Behind the Narrative (SAGE Publications, 2017), a new book by a former Kashmiri state civil servant, Khalid Bashir Ahmad, challenges what the author calls Kashmir's popular ‘Hindu historiography.’
A controversial Facebook post about Islam recently prompted angry Muslim mobs to go on a rampage setting buildings on fire and clash with the police in West Bengal, killing a 65-year-old Hindu man. Retaliatory Hindu mobs burnt down the dargah and shops owned by Muslims. Who is responsible for this communal tinderbox? We ask experts.
The focus of the government should be on implementation, not amendment, says Jayasimha Nuggehalli who helped draft the rules. The only change should be to let go of small-time butchers.
SANYA DHINGRA
MoSPI proposes to remove closed factories from IIP sample, aiming for truer picture of India’s industrial health in upcoming 2022–23 base series. Plan open to public feedback until 25 November.
Bihar is blessed with a land more fertile for revolutions than any in India. Why has it fallen so far behind then? Constant obsession with politics is at the root of its destruction.
So SG wants the learned judges of SC to be as simplistic as Judge Judy was when dealing with a poodle. Strange logic. Forget all the intricacies and intrigues. Forget all the brain-washings, arguments and counter arguments. Hahaha………
A true case of Love Jihad. The court is right as if the Nikah, religious conversion & brainwashing happened due to a conspiracy, the Nikal is invalid. And Hindu parents need to know if their daughters are a rightful bounty for Muslims Fundamentalists. Shekhar, whom I considered on one of the saner and impartial voices in the media, is losing his touch with masses.
The problem with the so-called liberal, free thinking people is that they live in utopian world where every thing is super human, all are upright law abiding and at the same time aware of their rights. Which is fine if it is indeed a reality. We Hindus were once upon a time lived each one as a separate island ethically.Our scriptures always say to look inward to avoid detractions. It was always each individual on his/ her own to seek salvation.Each on his own path. No doctrines. Be true to yourself and do not impose your thought on others, because everything in this world is part of you. Conflicts came when others with other faiths,with dogmas and strict regimentation and indoctrination started intruding our way of life. Now,in this modern days of mass communication and people of other faiths want their faiths to expand even on unwilling populace,conflicts do arise. Resistance is an essential expression of human being and as such do one does not have a free hand to thrust their religious beliefs on others,violently or otherwise. In this case, dispute is not whether a 24 year woman has a right to do what she wants. It is about a ti?r bomb that is waiting to explode,wherein a particular set of people out to destroy our inward looking,individual based peace loving society and try to change the basic tenets of this ancient cultured land in to a territory of violent intolerant strictly regimented dogmatic territory,where the same lady who wants to live in the way she wants,would be subjected a set of dogmas where she covers her body head to toe, be at the mercy of the men she married till he chooses to abandon her by just saying talaq 3 times! If she still is carried away by the religion she wishes to follow,let her be on her way.But the court must desire,whether this nation can afford the luxury of assault by a barbarically indoctrinated primitive force. We,the people of Hindu India will oppose tooth and nail such a brutal people to our last man. Be that be very clear.
This is a bizarrely bizzare judgement. I have to wonder: these guys are judges? And what kind of education did they get on justice, or for that matter on liberty, freedom and human rights?
Seems to me, that this country is going bonkers. Politicians, law enforcers and the judiciary seem to be adept at infantilising the citizenry. And many among the billion plus population seem to have the mentality of toddlers. I don’t see much hope for this toxic, perineally primitive country.
A most exceptional judicial intervention. The only situation in which it would appear reasonable is if the young lady’s friend was established to be an active member of ISIS, for example. For people who are instinctively averse to marriages taking place across the religious divide, think of the great love story of Nargis and Sunil Dutt, how devoted he was to her till the last phase of her life.
So SG wants the learned judges of SC to be as simplistic as Judge Judy was when dealing with a poodle. Strange logic. Forget all the intricacies and intrigues. Forget all the brain-washings, arguments and counter arguments. Hahaha………
A true case of Love Jihad. The court is right as if the Nikah, religious conversion & brainwashing happened due to a conspiracy, the Nikal is invalid. And Hindu parents need to know if their daughters are a rightful bounty for Muslims Fundamentalists. Shekhar, whom I considered on one of the saner and impartial voices in the media, is losing his touch with masses.
The problem with the so-called liberal, free thinking people is that they live in utopian world where every thing is super human, all are upright law abiding and at the same time aware of their rights. Which is fine if it is indeed a reality. We Hindus were once upon a time lived each one as a separate island ethically.Our scriptures always say to look inward to avoid detractions. It was always each individual on his/ her own to seek salvation.Each on his own path. No doctrines. Be true to yourself and do not impose your thought on others, because everything in this world is part of you. Conflicts came when others with other faiths,with dogmas and strict regimentation and indoctrination started intruding our way of life. Now,in this modern days of mass communication and people of other faiths want their faiths to expand even on unwilling populace,conflicts do arise. Resistance is an essential expression of human being and as such do one does not have a free hand to thrust their religious beliefs on others,violently or otherwise. In this case, dispute is not whether a 24 year woman has a right to do what she wants. It is about a ti?r bomb that is waiting to explode,wherein a particular set of people out to destroy our inward looking,individual based peace loving society and try to change the basic tenets of this ancient cultured land in to a territory of violent intolerant strictly regimented dogmatic territory,where the same lady who wants to live in the way she wants,would be subjected a set of dogmas where she covers her body head to toe, be at the mercy of the men she married till he chooses to abandon her by just saying talaq 3 times! If she still is carried away by the religion she wishes to follow,let her be on her way.But the court must desire,whether this nation can afford the luxury of assault by a barbarically indoctrinated primitive force. We,the people of Hindu India will oppose tooth and nail such a brutal people to our last man. Be that be very clear.
This is a bizarrely bizzare judgement. I have to wonder: these guys are judges? And what kind of education did they get on justice, or for that matter on liberty, freedom and human rights?
Seems to me, that this country is going bonkers. Politicians, law enforcers and the judiciary seem to be adept at infantilising the citizenry. And many among the billion plus population seem to have the mentality of toddlers. I don’t see much hope for this toxic, perineally primitive country.
A most exceptional judicial intervention. The only situation in which it would appear reasonable is if the young lady’s friend was established to be an active member of ISIS, for example. For people who are instinctively averse to marriages taking place across the religious divide, think of the great love story of Nargis and Sunil Dutt, how devoted he was to her till the last phase of her life.