Every day, the New York City’s American Museum of Natural History, a popular school trip destination, exposes children to racist depictions that enable hate crimes against Asian Americans.
RBI said India’s rising retail participation in the F&O market may pose several challenges, and the stock of household debt is 'comparatively high' in relation to GDP per capita.
Navy team has already visited Ambala air station where IAF has kept one squadron of Rafales to understand commonalities of maintenance that can be pursued.
Changed reality for Modi govt in its 3rd innings is by no means rise of a new phenomenon. It's a return to old normal where even majorities had to routinely wrestle with storied million mutinies.
Both the comments above are true and moreover I think the title is misleading. It is true that many universities and not able to use the funds as the article says.
//“Most universities cite administrative issues like not having a vice-chancellor, or registrar or something similar. But another reason behind non-utilisation of funds is that state universities have to face a lot of political pressure from local bodies, when it comes to how funds should be utilised, especially in construction work. An MLA or councillor will want his company to get the construction tender, as another legislator will want the same. So the administration mostly just stops the work,” the official said.//
but that does not mean that there is no fund crunch. It is in fact severe. You can see that many Universities who are able to use it are using it to 100%, clear indication of fund crunch.
What is the total percentage of funds utilized?
What was the total funding as fraction of GDP over year?
The problem is the funding agencies including UGC do not release funds at the beginning of the year. Most often funds are sanctioned and/or released only by Feb or Mar and the Utilisation certificates have to be ready by March 31st. So the UC gets delayed which is then cited as a reason for non release of funds…
“The university has reported expenses to us, but they are not as per the guidelines of UGC, therefore we cannot update it for the university,” the official said.
Both the comments above are true and moreover I think the title is misleading. It is true that many universities and not able to use the funds as the article says.
//“Most universities cite administrative issues like not having a vice-chancellor, or registrar or something similar. But another reason behind non-utilisation of funds is that state universities have to face a lot of political pressure from local bodies, when it comes to how funds should be utilised, especially in construction work. An MLA or councillor will want his company to get the construction tender, as another legislator will want the same. So the administration mostly just stops the work,” the official said.//
but that does not mean that there is no fund crunch. It is in fact severe. You can see that many Universities who are able to use it are using it to 100%, clear indication of fund crunch.
What is the total percentage of funds utilized?
What was the total funding as fraction of GDP over year?
The problem is the funding agencies including UGC do not release funds at the beginning of the year. Most often funds are sanctioned and/or released only by Feb or Mar and the Utilisation certificates have to be ready by March 31st. So the UC gets delayed which is then cited as a reason for non release of funds…
“The university has reported expenses to us, but they are not as per the guidelines of UGC, therefore we cannot update it for the university,” the official said.
—— Thats the problem ——–guidelines of UGC