As social media debated whether audiences were consuming Pujarini Pradhan as a symbol, The Juggernaut turned her into a story that could circulate globally, with or without her participation.
Regulator seeks feedback on allowing firms to repurchase shares via exchanges after tax changes, as markets reel from war-led selloff and foreign outflows.
China patiently invested capital, skill and technology in coal gasification. Unlike it, we won’t move from words to action. As crude prices decline, we lose interest.
We can only expect media dogs to come with this insensitive articles who are on the pay roll of global radical feminism cult to mock the rising murder of husbands in India.
People who are so obsessed with social media posts that say anything wrong about women ask why a few cases of people being murdered freak out men. Hypocrisy
“Many say”, “experts say”, “social media”. I love it when an article uses these phrases and then writes something controversial. Just escape the responsibility. But the reality is that the writer chose that specific set of people to listen to and quote. Whatever is written here is the writer’s and by extension of that, The Print’s view on the matter.
“Most of these women weren’t cold-blooded killers. They were trapped in marriages they couldn’t escape, with no money or support”.
Yup, it is a well-known fact that killing husband showers them with money. All the support for planning cold-blooded murder, but they definitely did not have the support to just leave. Amazing analysis by the criminologist.
This is just like saying honor killings happen because society boycotts those families, and honor killers are less cold-blooded than other murderers.
Please answer my one question, when you had to answer the “why”, why did you quote these specific people? Is there no “expert” out there who thinks otherwise, or do you simply don’t want to print their view?
At least the social activist admits that women are monsters just like men, and the reason men cheat is that women at home don’t provide happiness and contentment.
That the society is so surprised by these few events when no brouhaha over BJP leader killing family and many such headlines of men killing family or the silence on 6000 women are still killed just for dowry per year and 19000 married women dying every year, is testament the extent to which femicide is normalized in Indian society where women fighting back creates ruckus of demand for extra laws to tackle these! Why the law for murder is same for everybody regardless of sex. Get out of your misogynistic lense.
Right is right and wrong is wrong. Where is the question of gender? Why to kill if one wants to escape? When one can find accompliances to commit murder, voluntarily become criminals, and destroy their own lives, surely they can find someone to support them.
We can only expect media dogs to come with this insensitive articles who are on the pay roll of global radical feminism cult to mock the rising murder of husbands in India.
Start a campaign to make marriage, divorce and remarriage easy – that will help both men and women survive !
People who are so obsessed with social media posts that say anything wrong about women ask why a few cases of people being murdered freak out men. Hypocrisy
“Many say”, “experts say”, “social media”. I love it when an article uses these phrases and then writes something controversial. Just escape the responsibility. But the reality is that the writer chose that specific set of people to listen to and quote. Whatever is written here is the writer’s and by extension of that, The Print’s view on the matter.
“Most of these women weren’t cold-blooded killers. They were trapped in marriages they couldn’t escape, with no money or support”.
Yup, it is a well-known fact that killing husband showers them with money. All the support for planning cold-blooded murder, but they definitely did not have the support to just leave. Amazing analysis by the criminologist.
This is just like saying honor killings happen because society boycotts those families, and honor killers are less cold-blooded than other murderers.
Please answer my one question, when you had to answer the “why”, why did you quote these specific people? Is there no “expert” out there who thinks otherwise, or do you simply don’t want to print their view?
At least the social activist admits that women are monsters just like men, and the reason men cheat is that women at home don’t provide happiness and contentment.
An excellent attempt by Ms. Nootan Sharma to portray these criminal wives as the actual victims.
That the society is so surprised by these few events when no brouhaha over BJP leader killing family and many such headlines of men killing family or the silence on 6000 women are still killed just for dowry per year and 19000 married women dying every year, is testament the extent to which femicide is normalized in Indian society where women fighting back creates ruckus of demand for extra laws to tackle these! Why the law for murder is same for everybody regardless of sex. Get out of your misogynistic lense.
Right is right and wrong is wrong. Where is the question of gender? Why to kill if one wants to escape? When one can find accompliances to commit murder, voluntarily become criminals, and destroy their own lives, surely they can find someone to support them.
The Print is becoming unreadable. You cannot quote Deepika Narayan Bharadwaj and expect to be taken seriously.