Ranveer Singh joins the ranks of Indian actors Shah Rukh Khan and Prabhas with two films in the top 10 highest-grossing Indian films in the North America.
Dhurandhar’s Hamza, played by Ranveer Singh, is, at different stages, Karna, Arjuna, Hamlet, Michael Corleone, Achilles, Orestes, Odysseus, and Heracles, yet reducible to none of them.
Directed and performed by Paperclip’s co-founders, 'Blame it on Nehru' was performed for the first time in Delhi on 22 March at the Bangiya Samaj Mancha.
With the films, Aditya Dhar achieved something Bollywood has been trying to engineer for years—an event blockbuster that dominates both box office and national conversation.
Aditya Dhar's 'Dhurandhar: The Revenge' has opened to massive praise from the film industry. The sequel was released on 19 March in theatres across the country.
Indians tend to fuss more about the damage done to the Indian psyche by Thomas B Macaulay’s infamous Minute of 1835, but he was preceded in this unholy endeavour by James Mill.
A govt official said that although ATF prices for domestic market had been expected to rise 100 per cent in April, increase was moderated to 25 per cent to cushion burden on domestic passengers.
It’s easy to understand why the government can’t speak the hard truth. When this war ends, as all wars do, India’s interests will lie with both the winner and the loser.
Trash movie reviews by clueless Liber**nduu critic.
These idiots have spent their whole life orgasming over worthless-storyless ISI-loving chut*yaap like Pathaan-Panther-Tiger etc.
Probably Abbbu(ISI and Soros) se pressure aa raha hai, Aditya-Yami ka image spoil karna ka….ukhaad toh kuch sakte nhi, even this part 2 will be a blockbuster but Dream-on Shobbha ji ! LOL
None of what the blogger said about the actors and the characters stick. The piece does have ta somewhat weary, seen-it-all tone that doesn’t earn its cynicism
She goes after Dhurandhar disproportionately while often giving a pass to genuinely trashy Bollywood output from bigger, more established star camps. That kind of selective criticism reveals potential bias rather than principled film commentary. It raises the question — is she critiquing the film on merit, or is she critiquing the people behind it?
And there’s a reasonable basis for suspecting the latter, because:
A) Dhurandhar and its team represent a certain kind of nationalist, action-oriented cinema that she seems personally uncomfortable with
B) Aditya Dhar and Yami Gautam are not from the traditional Bollywood inner circle
C) The film’s success came somewhat outside the establishment approval machine
So her commentary reads less like genuine film criticism and more like establishment discomfort with outsiders doing well.
These award functions are dominated by nepo-babies. Why should Aditya Dhar seek validation from those who gave best newcomer award to Ananya Pandey?
Dhurandar made more than 1000 crore, and that’s a slab on these award-mongerers.
Trash movie reviews by clueless Liber**nduu critic.
These idiots have spent their whole life orgasming over worthless-storyless ISI-loving chut*yaap like Pathaan-Panther-Tiger etc.
Probably Abbbu(ISI and Soros) se pressure aa raha hai, Aditya-Yami ka image spoil karna ka….ukhaad toh kuch sakte nhi, even this part 2 will be a blockbuster but Dream-on Shobbha ji ! LOL
As biased as ever. Cannot live with reality.
None of what the blogger said about the actors and the characters stick. The piece does have ta somewhat weary, seen-it-all tone that doesn’t earn its cynicism
She goes after Dhurandhar disproportionately while often giving a pass to genuinely trashy Bollywood output from bigger, more established star camps. That kind of selective criticism reveals potential bias rather than principled film commentary. It raises the question — is she critiquing the film on merit, or is she critiquing the people behind it?
And there’s a reasonable basis for suspecting the latter, because:
A) Dhurandhar and its team represent a certain kind of nationalist, action-oriented cinema that she seems personally uncomfortable with
B) Aditya Dhar and Yami Gautam are not from the traditional Bollywood inner circle
C) The film’s success came somewhat outside the establishment approval machine
So her commentary reads less like genuine film criticism and more like establishment discomfort with outsiders doing well.
I wonder what the editorial motivation is.
These award functions are dominated by nepo-babies. Why should Aditya Dhar seek validation from those who gave best newcomer award to Ananya Pandey?
Dhurandar made more than 1000 crore, and that’s a slab on these award-mongerers.