A 19-year-old student of Kamala Nehru College tells ThePrint about the three times she was 'molested' on this bus. Women say it's been happening since 1985
With non-leather products driving global footwear demand between 2020 and 2024, India’s global market share stood at 1.85% in 2024, says a NITI Aayog report.
ISKP, a sub-continental branch of the Islamic State, is said to have vowed to extend operations in Kashmir, on encouragement from Pakistan’s security establishment.
Pakistan’s army has been a rentier force available to a reasonable bidder. It has never come to the aid of any Muslims including Palestinians or the Gazans, except making noises here and there.
I have studied many things but if texts are produced from a certain prejudiced perspective then what’s the point of engagement & change ? Provocation may help one to start a conversation but actual conversation needs to happen beyond a certain point. I have never seen him ever engaging seriously even though i have studied a lot of his articles & has seen him on various Audio-Visual platforms discussing the Dalit issue.
Should only upper caste study the history or Dalits & other oppressed classes are willing to engage with historical narratives in honest manners ? Are they willing to look beyond privilege-oppressed identities to the system which creates these identities ? Will they only remain critical of identities while allowing the system that perpetuates these identities to remain intact or will they look beyond identities to the system itself ?
The system of oppression from their perspective is religious but never political or economical whereas religions appropriate the social behavior to gain the numbers so then the question arises ‘whose system is it to oppress’ – All religions all over the world appropriated what was already prevalent in the society or the society which was divided even before the religious umbrella created a single religious denominational identity ?
I can keep discussing Caste from various point of views & according to me the only texts which should be allowed in history are ones which provide the most accurate portrayal of history in factual numbers, incidents, manuscripts, inscription but leaving the judgment to interpret them on each individual.
Students shouldn’t waste time reading kancha’s trash
I have studied many things but if texts are produced from a certain prejudiced perspective then what’s the point of engagement & change ? Provocation may help one to start a conversation but actual conversation needs to happen beyond a certain point. I have never seen him ever engaging seriously even though i have studied a lot of his articles & has seen him on various Audio-Visual platforms discussing the Dalit issue.
Should only upper caste study the history or Dalits & other oppressed classes are willing to engage with historical narratives in honest manners ? Are they willing to look beyond privilege-oppressed identities to the system which creates these identities ? Will they only remain critical of identities while allowing the system that perpetuates these identities to remain intact or will they look beyond identities to the system itself ?
The system of oppression from their perspective is religious but never political or economical whereas religions appropriate the social behavior to gain the numbers so then the question arises ‘whose system is it to oppress’ – All religions all over the world appropriated what was already prevalent in the society or the society which was divided even before the religious umbrella created a single religious denominational identity ?
I can keep discussing Caste from various point of views & according to me the only texts which should be allowed in history are ones which provide the most accurate portrayal of history in factual numbers, incidents, manuscripts, inscription but leaving the judgment to interpret them on each individual.