UP state civil service aspirants challenge answer key in preliminary exam; apex court reserves verdict, says can only step in when answers are 'obnoxiously...
DMK working president M.K. Stalin Sunday demanded the immediate withdrawal of the proposal, calling it a move aimed at nullifying reservation for Dalits and backward classes.
Modi had promised a leaner bureaucracy under his mantra of ‘minimum government, maximum governance’. Since 2014, vacancies have declined from 1,291 to 782.
With officers drawn from three cadres running the union territory, administration and law enforcement of Chandigarh is often uncoordinated and haphazard.
Chitleen K. Sethi
The industry forecasts exports are set to grow 16% in 2025-26, boosted by surplus domestic production and a drive to push into 26 underserved global markets with strong potential.
Taylor ‘Fema’ Hiester, commander of USAF F-16 Viper Demo Team, hit out at air show organisers for continuing with the show after Wing Commander Namansh Syal lost his life in the incident.
It is a brilliant, reasonably priced, and mostly homemade aircraft with a stellar safety record; only two crashes in 24 years since its first flight. But its crash is a moment of introspection.
As evident, there are two type of Judges in India one who knows law and one who knows Law Minister alike situation will arise in top Bureaucracy level such as One who is very Intelligent i.e recruited through UPSC IAS Exam and one who is qualified but not performing upto mark at Corporate industry but has Political favour. Because the person who is qualified as well as outperforming at Corporate level will never show interest to leave handsome Salary and Privileges provided by the company. So , ultimately those will be shortlisted for lateral entry who have good favour in political sphere as well as become almost non-productive at Corporate sector. Because everybody knows the position of a Bureaucrat in front of a Politician.Lateral Entry will obviously be a non-trasparent policy to inflow favourable candidate to administration and to make seperate entity from IAS Officers. There will be no one coming through lateral entry to oppose the decision of the ruling party.It will ease their way of ruling their constituency.
Concluding the move is good but implementation will not serve the actuality.
I m also an ias aspirant and many of my friends are ,but none of us are happy with this move …it’s not fair policy because aspirants sacrifice and work hard for years together for getting into ias .by lateral entry one who is close to the govt I mean ministers can get easier entry …this is not what should be the way to select bureaucrats
The idea is good but there is so many problems arrive when it implemented because we see so many backdoor here so it is not a good idea for such type of respected service.
Thank you
This move is just to support people of RSS community and let them entry into the administration without giving the exam,as the people in RSS know they have no potential to crack the civil services exam. Why it didn’t happen in the rule of some another government?? Why all oppositions are against it?? simply because they know the government want their people to enter the administration.so even if they are not the ruling party after the next election, they will have their own people in the administration. They are straightaway going against the laws mentioned in the Constitution book as article 314-322 says that no political party or power can interfere in the selection process of the candidates. Truly a black event for our democracy.
Most of the people are talking in favour of this ridiculous decision jst bcs of they are scared to talk against d government decisions !!! I am upsc aspirant & I oppose this decision !!! If gov. is really very sensitive towards reform in civil services it should first go through the administrative reform commission report suggestions !!!
Absolutely ridiculous, I don’t know what kind of people you interviewed. Lateral entry is just another kind of scam. Not just current but future Govts too, will misuse it to their personal benefits. These domain knowledge & expertise are all are flowery phrases to justify the move. But one must understand the process one goes through to get selected an IAS officer. It’s a process which moulds anyone (with absolutely no knowledge of governance) to be a master of governance. To fix india, fixing political class is the need of hour & not recruitment process of bureaucrats.
Thank you for the informative post. this is very helpful to make my preparation effective.
As evident, there are two type of Judges in India one who knows law and one who knows Law Minister alike situation will arise in top Bureaucracy level such as One who is very Intelligent i.e recruited through UPSC IAS Exam and one who is qualified but not performing upto mark at Corporate industry but has Political favour. Because the person who is qualified as well as outperforming at Corporate level will never show interest to leave handsome Salary and Privileges provided by the company. So , ultimately those will be shortlisted for lateral entry who have good favour in political sphere as well as become almost non-productive at Corporate sector. Because everybody knows the position of a Bureaucrat in front of a Politician.Lateral Entry will obviously be a non-trasparent policy to inflow favourable candidate to administration and to make seperate entity from IAS Officers. There will be no one coming through lateral entry to oppose the decision of the ruling party.It will ease their way of ruling their constituency.
Concluding the move is good but implementation will not serve the actuality.
I m also an ias aspirant and many of my friends are ,but none of us are happy with this move …it’s not fair policy because aspirants sacrifice and work hard for years together for getting into ias .by lateral entry one who is close to the govt I mean ministers can get easier entry …this is not what should be the way to select bureaucrats
The idea is good but there is so many problems arrive when it implemented because we see so many backdoor here so it is not a good idea for such type of respected service.
Thank you
I think this is not a good step.
This move is just to support people of RSS community and let them entry into the administration without giving the exam,as the people in RSS know they have no potential to crack the civil services exam. Why it didn’t happen in the rule of some another government?? Why all oppositions are against it?? simply because they know the government want their people to enter the administration.so even if they are not the ruling party after the next election, they will have their own people in the administration. They are straightaway going against the laws mentioned in the Constitution book as article 314-322 says that no political party or power can interfere in the selection process of the candidates. Truly a black event for our democracy.
Most of the people are talking in favour of this ridiculous decision jst bcs of they are scared to talk against d government decisions !!! I am upsc aspirant & I oppose this decision !!! If gov. is really very sensitive towards reform in civil services it should first go through the administrative reform commission report suggestions !!!
Absolutely ridiculous, I don’t know what kind of people you interviewed. Lateral entry is just another kind of scam. Not just current but future Govts too, will misuse it to their personal benefits. These domain knowledge & expertise are all are flowery phrases to justify the move. But one must understand the process one goes through to get selected an IAS officer. It’s a process which moulds anyone (with absolutely no knowledge of governance) to be a master of governance. To fix india, fixing political class is the need of hour & not recruitment process of bureaucrats.
New policy is subjugated every time fuss or diverting student
Very good initiative by government.