During her long exile, Taslima Nasreen’s parents, brothers, grandmother, aunts, uncles and teachers have grown old and died in Bangladesh. And she couldn’t say goodbye.
In May 1974, RSS chief Madhukar Dattatraya Deoras spoke at a lecture series in Pune about caste-based discrimination and social equality within the Hindu fold.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
While the IAF remains committed to the Tejas programme and has placed orders for 180 Tejas Mk1A, the force is eagerly waiting for the Tejas Mk 2 version.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
What a toxic article. This person is clearly a corrupted feminist against men who further wishes to elevate women. The hypocrisy is visible and many contradictions to be made. Apparently the author has a male’s mindset to make generalised statements. Inequalities in faith? Faith are about paths to God. Most other things are cultural law since legitimately men are stationed with more burdens in particular faiths. The spreading of white sheets was done by more western newlyweds. This author is probably Hindu or atheist at most (highest anti of devil creed), definitely Anti-Islamic and Anti-Muslim, doesn’t even understand the concept of mhr. It’s not actual dowry, people have labelled it as so. Mhr is an obligatory gift for the woman. It’s not of the faith from the derogatory caste system which belittles people of lower castes and torture people from eating meat prohibited to themselves that they see as holy. This article is missing a lot of context and expandature, instead nit-picking without the intentions of elaborating. I think most people in the world wish for their partners to be a virgin if they are seeking marriage. Uh, because by faith it would be more difficult to marry more than one man, especially being impregnated by multiple at different times – they may all want their own kids – when will she get a break. As typical breadwinners, it wouldn’t even make sense. Seeking divorce right has nothing to do with the faith, that is a law and questioning of the nation itself. Misogynist patriarchs? So India. Those people that rape and kill women on a daily basis, kill their own daughters and commit female infanticide. There is more gender inequality in Hinduism than anything else. This sort of thing can happen in any country. Hindu girls have been killed for wearing jeans or eating beef. Hindus secretly eat beef all the time here abroad. In Hinduism “A man alone has the privilege to transmit his knowledge and powers through a transmission ceremony to his elder son, and women are not even allowed to witness it. Women should not be allowed to live freely or on her own. She must be always under the care of a male person, father, brother, husband, son or relation, but never a a male who is not any of these.” In the past, the plight of the widows was even more pitiable. Hindu widows: Widows were not allowed to participate in marriage ceremonies or remarry. They were morally held responsible for the premature death of their husbands and they had to carry that guilt and the burden of shame for the rest of their lives. Men in Hinduism can marry as much as they want without justification, especially higher castes. The Manusmriti (9.1-3) suggest that women should be controlled, and kept under watch since they cannot be trusted. Yet we are told of any of this
What a toxic article. This person is clearly a corrupted feminist against men who further wishes to elevate women. The hypocrisy is visible and many contradictions to be made. Apparently the author has a male’s mindset to make generalised statements. Inequalities in faith? Faith are about paths to God. Most other things are cultural law since legitimately men are stationed with more burdens in particular faiths. The spreading of white sheets was done by more western newlyweds. This author is probably Hindu or atheist at most (highest anti of devil creed), definitely Anti-Islamic and Anti-Muslim, doesn’t even understand the concept of mhr. It’s not actual dowry, people have labelled it as so. Mhr is an obligatory gift for the woman. It’s not of the faith from the derogatory caste system which belittles people of lower castes and torture people from eating meat prohibited to themselves that they see as holy. This article is missing a lot of context and expandature, instead nit-picking without the intentions of elaborating. I think most people in the world wish for their partners to be a virgin if they are seeking marriage. Uh, because by faith it would be more difficult to marry more than one man, especially being impregnated by multiple at different times – they may all want their own kids – when will she get a break. As typical breadwinners, it wouldn’t even make sense. Seeking divorce right has nothing to do with the faith, that is a law and questioning of the nation itself. Misogynist patriarchs? So India. Those people that rape and kill women on a daily basis, kill their own daughters and commit female infanticide. There is more gender inequality in Hinduism than anything else. This sort of thing can happen in any country. Hindu girls have been killed for wearing jeans or eating beef. Hindus secretly eat beef all the time here abroad. In Hinduism “A man alone has the privilege to transmit his knowledge and powers through a transmission ceremony to his elder son, and women are not even allowed to witness it. Women should not be allowed to live freely or on her own. She must be always under the care of a male person, father, brother, husband, son or relation, but never a a male who is not any of these.” In the past, the plight of the widows was even more pitiable. Hindu widows: Widows were not allowed to participate in marriage ceremonies or remarry. They were morally held responsible for the premature death of their husbands and they had to carry that guilt and the burden of shame for the rest of their lives. Men in Hinduism can marry as much as they want without justification, especially higher castes. The Manusmriti (9.1-3) suggest that women should be controlled, and kept under watch since they cannot be trusted. Yet we are told of any of this
Komi Hamane i salute you brother