The discovery in Uttar Pradesh's Sinauli could alter the understanding of contemporary Harappan culture, says Archaeological Society of India; scholars dispute chariot claim.
India’s foreign policy today is driven less by Western alignment or global liberalism and more by domestic political imperatives — economic, ideological, and electoral.
Observed that the archeological bench structure in front of the person standing in the image is almost at the surface level, it means if the farm land is even once plowed the plough would hit the bench right through.
Doctoral student is seeing everything fro. Marxist Muellerian angle. She has that lens on her eyes so she is unable to see the reality and she accuses ASI.
Anyway why do one needs recognotion from a JNU student ? Yeah I repeat student because only in JNU you continue to remain student for such a long time. All other universities will throw peopleout on the grounds of incompetense but JNU will always accept all anti Hindu Pro Marxist Muelleriand.
According to Ms. Ruchika, the people must have thought: “Oh no. They are dead. What should we do.. Let’s build a raised burial chamber for them because they were men of renown. They were great warriors, so lets put things that were important to them, and things that signify what they excelled at, such as these swords and shields and headgear.” Then finally, “Hmm something is missing.. yes lets throw in this random bullock cart. Perfect!..”
Ms. Ruchika sharma with due respect to your knowledge.. you didn’t see it, but you say it’s not a chariot n people should go by your rationale to pass a judgement. ASI has unearthed. N they have passed their judgement.
You should basically probe why it’s not a chariot.. or give some alternate explanation “once you see the finding by your own eyes”
Why does a doctoral student’s opinion count in this article?
Why is any opinion part of this story?
This site lost all credibility just by doing this.
Report like journalists, not like hate-filled idiots.
With all due disrespect to ms ruchika sharma..
Why do you have allergies from hindutva ….
Wht wrong in calling tht mother goddess??
Why do you want to introduce pseudo secularism in every damm thing???
Go have some life lady… may allah or jesus whoever u recognise bless you.. huhh
Observed that the archeological bench structure in front of the person standing in the image is almost at the surface level, it means if the farm land is even once plowed the plough would hit the bench right through.
Doctoral student is seeing everything fro. Marxist Muellerian angle. She has that lens on her eyes so she is unable to see the reality and she accuses ASI.
Anyway why do one needs recognotion from a JNU student ? Yeah I repeat student because only in JNU you continue to remain student for such a long time. All other universities will throw peopleout on the grounds of incompetense but JNU will always accept all anti Hindu Pro Marxist Muelleriand.
They have also found a dog buried there. This has important implications for the AIT/OIT controversy.
“Sharvara (Dog of Yama) (शर्वर) is an ancient Hindu mythical dog belonging to Yama. It is one of the two dogs that guard the netherworld.”
https://theprint.in/governance/asi-finds-corpses-chariots-at-contemporary-harappan-site-royalty-angle-being-explored/66363/
Sharava has counterparts in other Indo European mythologies. The dates of the burial clearly show that the inhabitants practiced a Vedic culture.
Why this obsession with fools from JNU who opine without studying a subject properly and are brainwashed by leftists?!
According to Ms. Ruchika, the people must have thought: “Oh no. They are dead. What should we do.. Let’s build a raised burial chamber for them because they were men of renown. They were great warriors, so lets put things that were important to them, and things that signify what they excelled at, such as these swords and shields and headgear.” Then finally, “Hmm something is missing.. yes lets throw in this random bullock cart. Perfect!..”
Ms. Ruchika sharma with due respect to your knowledge.. you didn’t see it, but you say it’s not a chariot n people should go by your rationale to pass a judgement. ASI has unearthed. N they have passed their judgement.
You should basically probe why it’s not a chariot.. or give some alternate explanation “once you see the finding by your own eyes”
Why does a doctoral student’s opinion count in this article?
Why is any opinion part of this story?
This site lost all credibility just by doing this.
Report like journalists, not like hate-filled idiots.
With all due disrespect to ms ruchika sharma..
Why do you have allergies from hindutva ….
Wht wrong in calling tht mother goddess??
Why do you want to introduce pseudo secularism in every damm thing???
Go have some life lady… may allah or jesus whoever u recognise bless you.. huhh