From anti-corruption and protests to opposing Modi and offering freebies, Kejriwal’s political strategy has been to react to the prevailing political winds rather than shaping them.
This move comes after months of investigations into the Delhi government's excise policy, which has been at the center of controversy and allegations of corruption.
The Enforcement Directorate alleges that bribe money generated from corruption in a contract issued by Delhi Jal Board was 'passed on' as election funds to AAP.
ED had arrested the ex-chief engineer for his alleged role in handing out a contract to NKG Infra at ‘highly inflated rates’. AAP denies all allegations, says agency acting at BJP’s behest.
The government’s Art, Culture and Language department organised the annual ‘Hasya Rang Utsav’ from 2 January to 6 January in association with the tourism department.
Delhi CM and AAP chief Kejriwal also accused the central govt of not providing trains to transport pilgrims under the state’s ‘Mukhya Mantri Tirath Yatra Yojana’.
Finance ministry says the proposed revamp will focus on structural reforms, rate rationalisation & ease of living, & will be deliberated upon in the coming weeks.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Standing up to America is usually not a personal risk for a leader in India. Any suggestions of foreign pressure unites India behind who they see as leading them in that fight.
What a baseless article! I found almost all information and facts mentioned about AAP wrong. Almost each statement in this article seemed biased. For example the first two paragraphs have many things wrong and here is the details.
AAP follows a welfarism model which most of the developed nations like UK, Canada, Australia, Japan, etc. follow, it is not a tactics of populism. Reactionary is apt for BJP, never for AAP or even Congress. AAP does have a substantive and long-term vision to make India a developed nation and hence its emphasis on citizen-centric policies on education, healthcare, etc. which no other party has been able to do. Although Anna ANDOLAN is headed by Anna Hazare, the real architect of this movement from beginning to end is Kejriwal who gathers not only Anna, but also Kiran Bedi and Prashant Bhushan.
The other paragraphs contain more and more baseless information. It is evident that this author knows very little of AAP, he has just gathered articles about it from GODI media and wrote a baseless essay. In concluding remarks, I state that it is AAP which is working for ensuring that society thrives in peace, harmony, and prosperity, the exact opposite of what this author mentioned.
What a baseless article! I found almost all information and facts mentioned about AAP wrong. Almost each statement in this article seemed biased. For example the first two paragraphs have many things wrong and here is the details.
AAP follows a welfarism model which most of the developed nations like UK, Canada, Australia, Japan, etc. follow, it is not a tactics of populism. Reactionary is apt for BJP, never for AAP or even Congress. AAP does have a substantive and long-term vision to make India a developed nation and hence its emphasis on citizen-centric policies on education, healthcare, etc. which no other party has been able to do. Although Anna ANDOLAN is headed by Anna Hazare, the real architect of this movement from beginning to end is Kejriwal who gathers not only Anna, but also Kiran Bedi and Prashant Bhushan.
The other paragraphs contain more and more baseless information. It is evident that this author knows very little of AAP, he has just gathered articles about it from GODI media and wrote a baseless essay. In concluding remarks, I state that it is AAP which is working for ensuring that society thrives in peace, harmony, and prosperity, the exact opposite of what this author mentioned.