Neither state govts nor companies earn large profits from lotteries. However, a look at the system shows there’s ample evidence of murky dealings and financial irregularities.
In an interview with Gulistan News this week, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said the government would leave law and order to J&K Police and slowly withdraw troops.
The ‘idea’ Kejriwal's politics grew around was a no-holds-barred fight against corruption. That is the reason Modi govt has now tarred him and his entire party with the same paint.
I suggest you read and educate yourself for another 10 years so that you might be able to think and look beyond your stones n temples n stars and every creation, that you might consider God and understand this is not an abrahamic faith, it is the faith of Adam and eve, when your hand made stones didn’t exist, don’t you dare to attack any religion, cause if others started attacking yours, yours will be the at the brink of oblivion, yours is already loosing its every impact and every teaching, thanks to people like you who concentrate on every thing else but not the scripture. Hope this doesn’t make you and you will reply with reason.
If it had been ruled for 1000 years by Buddhists, then who was there before them? Hindus of course because Buddhism itself originated in 5th century BC. This infantile abrahamic religion (Islam) which did not even exist 1500 years back has no authority to claim land, any land, on the south asian subcontinent for their conquest by war and forced conversion is hardly a legitimate annexation, it’s appropriation. The number of ancient Shiva and Shakti temples destroyed by muslims in Kashmir is far too many to let go, their murderous philosophy that looks down on all but their own, reeks of anthropocentrism and conceit in the name of all that they call holy.
I suggest you read and educate yourself for another 10 years so that you might be able to think and look beyond your stones n temples n stars and every creation, that you might consider God and understand this is not an abrahamic faith, it is the faith of Adam and eve, when your hand made stones didn’t exist, don’t you dare to attack any religion, cause if others started attacking yours, yours will be the at the brink of oblivion, yours is already loosing its every impact and every teaching, thanks to people like you who concentrate on every thing else but not the scripture. Hope this doesn’t make you and you will reply with reason.
Calling Islam a religion is a blatant exaggeration.
And as far as the attacking is concerned, go and check the statistics to get the true picture of how the Abrahamic followers have spread their ‘annexations’ all across the world not by moral force of persuasion but by all kinds of illegal, immoral and illegitimate forceful conversions. This narrow-minded, homogeneous, orthodox group of great intolerants and their venomous nexus with the misleading leftists ( like ‘The Print’) stand exposed today.
The Author has forgotten to mention that the history of Kashmir did not begin with Hindus! But it was a civilization with no religion, so much so it welcomed people of all religion and accepted them as they were so long as peace and harmony was not compromised! How and why and where do you think Shardha Peeth existed, It all began when Mughal wave arrived hind kush. Outsiders who were living peacefully started getting influenced and likewise started creating a separate Muslim dominated world. It was never religion based earlier on , but post mir shah things changed and Kashmir started moving towards it doom.
Are Hindus any different from Budhist, Jains or Sikhs. They all have similar religious thought, philosophy and way of life. Also all of them were equally killed by Muslims.
The following statement from the author sums up the history of Kashmir.
“The Brahmin version of Kashmir’s history argues that the region had always been ruled by Hindus and the intervening periods of Muslim rule were just a blip. The Muslim historians contend that Kashmir’s Muslim subjects have been subjugated by centuries of Hindu rule and their miseries never found any mention in historical writings.”
Brahmin version and Muslims version, both views confirm that Kashmir was ruled by non-Muslims for most of the time in the history. Islamisation of Kashmir is also a fact that is more important today because of ISIS ideology spreading among Muslims.
To continue my earlier post..
Sharda Peeth in Kashmir was a repository of Vedic manuscripts, largest library of its kind. Repeated Muslim invasions and massive conversions happened very recently a few hundred years ago.
It is the birth place of Kashmir Shaivism. All said and done the people are solidly with Modi-Shah-Doval triumvirate. Historic injustice has been rectified.
The only fact of Kashmir’s history that interests me is the mother of all catastrophes Maharaja Hari Singh created. All of us are still picking up the tab seventy years later. 2. It would be wise now to start with 2019. I respectfully do not agree with the Abrogation of Articles 370 / 35 A, even less with the conversion of a privileged state into a Union Territory. We will find that the mainstream parties were in fact playing a useful, necessary role. 3. Economic progress and prosperity have been promised to a state whose woes started about the time the rest of the country was opening up to reform. A sincere effort should be made to improve the lives of ordinary Kashmiris. 4. As far as terrorism and Pakistan are concerned, the constitutional changes in themselves will provide little solace. We have embarked on an immense adventure with emotion and ideology playing an outsize role in the decision making process.
You need to educate yourself a bit more. Till then just understand that being a passenger in a highly dynamic geopolitics does not help India’s cause. And, this legislative changes on Kashmir is just to make that important point. Whether Kashmir is a part of India or an independent nation has nothing to do with this change. However, expect any secession to take place after a very bitter war, which again has nothing to do with Article 370. It would happen anyway unless Pakistan accepts the status quo. And by the way, citizens like you are happier watching Pakistan playing on the front foot and when India plays front foot, you cry foul. I once again suggest to you to educate yourself before commenting. Or admit that you are a saint.
Understanding Kashmir doesnt start just with past 70 years of saga with Hari Singh and Sheik Abdulla. The history has much more component to geo-political changes that has been happening over the period of time, thousands of years passing by. If you want us to believe that Pakistan is a saintly state and talking with them will solve all the problems is like Nehru once did. When our army general told Nehru that he needs another 2 weeks to liberate POK and we can also get Lahore which is the seat of Punjabis, Nehru adamantly stopped and told that he will go file with UN and get the POK legally from UN as if his Chacha is sitting there to gift him Kashmir. Nehru’s ego came before him and that put him and India in vulnerable position many times, the last one being 1962 when China just walked in to take away Aksai Chin. If history of these events not taught you any lesson, no one will be able to teach any closed mind.
There is no mention of forced conversion of Hindus of Kashmir during Jehangir’s and Aurangzeb rules . This is how Brahmin have been ignored by Muslims.
This writer talks about multiple narratives but all the skepticism is only directed towards ‘brahmin’ historians while the muslim historian from 20th century or the european chroniclers from 19th had no biases ?It is hard to miss the pointed use of ‘brahmin’ but no such qualifier for specific muslims or the europeans. This is the kind of apologia and too clever by half attempt at showing hindus as a disjointed oppressors presented as ‘correct’ history is what pushes hindus towards the right wing.
Well, if you can refute their claims by providing sources like they did, we are all ears dear.
I am not your dear and such pathetic attempts to patronize are just silly. The question isn’t about sources but the skepticism towards any or all of them. Your poor comprehension and willingness to lap up as wisdom whatever is sold to you does explain why these jokers continue to peddle this nonsense .
Well, if you are from Tamil Nadu or Kerala the fist thing to do is hate brahmin as if he has stolen your cloths. The history given by the author is like Romila Thaper’s fictional version, patronized as historian by commies. And such story also do not have any source. It is like I create my story and say myself as source doesnt mean that there is a history to it. The author talks about Brahmins ruling. Go and check the history. The rulers of Kashmir were not Brahmins and the Mohammadins walked in only in 14th century. Who ruled Kashmir… there is a big list, not the one presented by the author here.
I suggest you read and educate yourself for another 10 years so that you might be able to think and look beyond your stones n temples n stars and every creation, that you might consider God and understand this is not an abrahamic faith, it is the faith of Adam and eve, when your hand made stones didn’t exist, don’t you dare to attack any religion, cause if others started attacking yours, yours will be the at the brink of oblivion, yours is already loosing its every impact and every teaching, thanks to people like you who concentrate on every thing else but not the scripture. Hope this doesn’t make you and you will reply with reason.
stupid article with no proof just some muslim glorifying of mslims here what a a bunch of lies without no proof , welcome to islam 101
If it had been ruled for 1000 years by Buddhists, then who was there before them? Hindus of course because Buddhism itself originated in 5th century BC. This infantile abrahamic religion (Islam) which did not even exist 1500 years back has no authority to claim land, any land, on the south asian subcontinent for their conquest by war and forced conversion is hardly a legitimate annexation, it’s appropriation. The number of ancient Shiva and Shakti temples destroyed by muslims in Kashmir is far too many to let go, their murderous philosophy that looks down on all but their own, reeks of anthropocentrism and conceit in the name of all that they call holy.
I suggest you read and educate yourself for another 10 years so that you might be able to think and look beyond your stones n temples n stars and every creation, that you might consider God and understand this is not an abrahamic faith, it is the faith of Adam and eve, when your hand made stones didn’t exist, don’t you dare to attack any religion, cause if others started attacking yours, yours will be the at the brink of oblivion, yours is already loosing its every impact and every teaching, thanks to people like you who concentrate on every thing else but not the scripture. Hope this doesn’t make you and you will reply with reason.
Calling Islam a religion is a blatant exaggeration.
And as far as the attacking is concerned, go and check the statistics to get the true picture of how the Abrahamic followers have spread their ‘annexations’ all across the world not by moral force of persuasion but by all kinds of illegal, immoral and illegitimate forceful conversions. This narrow-minded, homogeneous, orthodox group of great intolerants and their venomous nexus with the misleading leftists ( like ‘The Print’) stand exposed today.
The Author has forgotten to mention that the history of Kashmir did not begin with Hindus! But it was a civilization with no religion, so much so it welcomed people of all religion and accepted them as they were so long as peace and harmony was not compromised! How and why and where do you think Shardha Peeth existed, It all began when Mughal wave arrived hind kush. Outsiders who were living peacefully started getting influenced and likewise started creating a separate Muslim dominated world. It was never religion based earlier on , but post mir shah things changed and Kashmir started moving towards it doom.
Rediscovering Kashmir In Kalhana’s Paradise
https://www.eurasiareview.com/30082019-rediscovering-kashmir-in-kalhanas-paradise-oped/
Are Hindus any different from Budhist, Jains or Sikhs. They all have similar religious thought, philosophy and way of life. Also all of them were equally killed by Muslims.
The following statement from the author sums up the history of Kashmir.
“The Brahmin version of Kashmir’s history argues that the region had always been ruled by Hindus and the intervening periods of Muslim rule were just a blip. The Muslim historians contend that Kashmir’s Muslim subjects have been subjugated by centuries of Hindu rule and their miseries never found any mention in historical writings.”
Brahmin version and Muslims version, both views confirm that Kashmir was ruled by non-Muslims for most of the time in the history. Islamisation of Kashmir is also a fact that is more important today because of ISIS ideology spreading among Muslims.
To continue my earlier post..
Sharda Peeth in Kashmir was a repository of Vedic manuscripts, largest library of its kind. Repeated Muslim invasions and massive conversions happened very recently a few hundred years ago.
It is the birth place of Kashmir Shaivism. All said and done the people are solidly with Modi-Shah-Doval triumvirate. Historic injustice has been rectified.
The only fact of Kashmir’s history that interests me is the mother of all catastrophes Maharaja Hari Singh created. All of us are still picking up the tab seventy years later. 2. It would be wise now to start with 2019. I respectfully do not agree with the Abrogation of Articles 370 / 35 A, even less with the conversion of a privileged state into a Union Territory. We will find that the mainstream parties were in fact playing a useful, necessary role. 3. Economic progress and prosperity have been promised to a state whose woes started about the time the rest of the country was opening up to reform. A sincere effort should be made to improve the lives of ordinary Kashmiris. 4. As far as terrorism and Pakistan are concerned, the constitutional changes in themselves will provide little solace. We have embarked on an immense adventure with emotion and ideology playing an outsize role in the decision making process.
You need to educate yourself a bit more. Till then just understand that being a passenger in a highly dynamic geopolitics does not help India’s cause. And, this legislative changes on Kashmir is just to make that important point. Whether Kashmir is a part of India or an independent nation has nothing to do with this change. However, expect any secession to take place after a very bitter war, which again has nothing to do with Article 370. It would happen anyway unless Pakistan accepts the status quo. And by the way, citizens like you are happier watching Pakistan playing on the front foot and when India plays front foot, you cry foul. I once again suggest to you to educate yourself before commenting. Or admit that you are a saint.
Understanding Kashmir doesnt start just with past 70 years of saga with Hari Singh and Sheik Abdulla. The history has much more component to geo-political changes that has been happening over the period of time, thousands of years passing by. If you want us to believe that Pakistan is a saintly state and talking with them will solve all the problems is like Nehru once did. When our army general told Nehru that he needs another 2 weeks to liberate POK and we can also get Lahore which is the seat of Punjabis, Nehru adamantly stopped and told that he will go file with UN and get the POK legally from UN as if his Chacha is sitting there to gift him Kashmir. Nehru’s ego came before him and that put him and India in vulnerable position many times, the last one being 1962 when China just walked in to take away Aksai Chin. If history of these events not taught you any lesson, no one will be able to teach any closed mind.
There is no mention of forced conversion of Hindus of Kashmir during Jehangir’s and Aurangzeb rules . This is how Brahmin have been ignored by Muslims.
This writer talks about multiple narratives but all the skepticism is only directed towards ‘brahmin’ historians while the muslim historian from 20th century or the european chroniclers from 19th had no biases ?It is hard to miss the pointed use of ‘brahmin’ but no such qualifier for specific muslims or the europeans. This is the kind of apologia and too clever by half attempt at showing hindus as a disjointed oppressors presented as ‘correct’ history is what pushes hindus towards the right wing.
Well, if you can refute their claims by providing sources like they did, we are all ears dear.
I am not your dear and such pathetic attempts to patronize are just silly. The question isn’t about sources but the skepticism towards any or all of them. Your poor comprehension and willingness to lap up as wisdom whatever is sold to you does explain why these jokers continue to peddle this nonsense .
Well, if you are from Tamil Nadu or Kerala the fist thing to do is hate brahmin as if he has stolen your cloths. The history given by the author is like Romila Thaper’s fictional version, patronized as historian by commies. And such story also do not have any source. It is like I create my story and say myself as source doesnt mean that there is a history to it. The author talks about Brahmins ruling. Go and check the history. The rulers of Kashmir were not Brahmins and the Mohammadins walked in only in 14th century. Who ruled Kashmir… there is a big list, not the one presented by the author here.