Monday, 28 November, 2022
HomeDefenceSetback for Indian missile programme: Two failures in a week, submarine version...

Setback for Indian missile programme: Two failures in a week, submarine version stuck

Text Size:

Surface-to-air missile test fails on 22 December, submarine test failure five days before raises major concerns over India’s nuclear triad expansion.

New Delhi: The Indian missile development programme has encountered a setback with two successive failures within a week, including a worrying development in which a submarine-launched nuclear-capable missile got stuck in its testing canister following an unsuccessful test.

Sources told ThePrint that a recent test of the Quick Reaction Surface to Air Missile (QRSAM) failed during its test on 22 December at Chandipur-on-Sea in Odisha. It hit turbulence within 1.5 seconds of the missile taking off, as an actuator did not respond to a software command, according to sources.

QRSAM is being developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) to meet urgent requirements of the Indian Air Force for protection of vital assets. It is meant to complement the Akash short-range surface-to-air missile. It is supposed to take down fast-moving incoming air targets like missiles and fighter jets at extremely short notice. This was the third test of the missile.

More worryingly, there has been major concern with the failure of the K-4 submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM), which is being developed for the nuclear triad to give India the capability to take down long-range targets from under water.

A test carried out on 17 December ended in failure after the missile did not launch from an underwater pontoon, it is learnt. The missile, believed to have a range of over 3,500 km, is to be equipped on the INS Arihant and Arighat nuclear submarines as a second strike option.

Sources said that the K-4 missile did not activate during the test, with its battery getting drained after the launch command was given. It is believed that DRDO scientists were even unable to retrieve the missile from the test pontoon following the failure, raising safety concerns for the programme.

India’s lone nuclear missile-carrying submarine, the INS Arihant, is currently equipped with the 750 km range B-05 SLBM. However, the limited range of the missile and a struggle to keep the Arihant functional raises concerns on the effectiveness of the nuclear triad.

The 3,500-km range K-4 missile was to be the real game changer, giving India a second strike option over all potential target positions. While it has been tested three times before, the unsuccessful test last week raised concerns as the missile was to be launched from the INS Arihant shortly. Careful assessments are now being made to pinpoint the reason for the failure, and assess whether it would lead to safety considerations for a submarine launch.

DRDO has also started work on the K-5, a 5,000 km range SLBM that would be fitted onboard nuclear-powered submarines, as well as a futuristic K-6 project to develop an underwater launched missile with a range of up to 6,000 km.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Manu Pubby in my opinion is trying get the attention of the public since he become Deputy Editor of The Print. He will come out with more controversial news in future.

  2. Failure reported here called success elsewhere! Failures are part and parcel of any technology development process. NASA had numerous disastrous failures before finally tasting success. But USA and rest of the world has more informed journalists as against India. imbecile ones making living by spreading doom and gloom.

  3. Failures are stepping Stones…. don’t worry…. keep efforts afoot…. rectify the lakunas…. success is certain…any new invention or new development if works for the first time…. something is worry some.

  4. What is the percentage of “reservations” for recruitment and promotions and since how long? Percentage of DRDO employees are “reserved” 9i.e. first class Indians?

  5. Was the author of this article drunk while writing this article? Maybe yes. Because EACH AND EVERYTHING WRITTEN HERE IS FULL BULLSHIT and baseless. Hehehe, K4 SLBM was fired and the author was told that it got stuck. hehehee this is a classic example of ‘utter nonsense’ propoganda.

      • What proves are there to verify the above link fake and this news true. This news is circulated only with the reference of article in theprint and no other means.

    • You are mixing u two different weapons. The K4 is a submarine launched ballistic missile, and the qrsam is a surface to air missile. They have different role and purposes. They are different missile system.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular