Friday, March 31, 2023
HomePoliticsNot given up Article 370 fight but illogical to ask Modi govt...

Not given up Article 370 fight but illogical to ask Modi govt to restore it — Omar Abdullah

In an interview to ThePrint, former J&K CM Omar Abdullah says Modi govt asked him to sign a personal bond in Oct-Nov last year that required him to not speak on politics.

Text Size:

Srinagar: Former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister and the National Conference (NC) vice-president Omar Abdullah has told ThePrint that he has not given up on the efforts to ensure J&K’s special status is restored. 

Abdullah has been under fire in the Valley since he wrote an opinion piece in The Indian Express, in which he said he won’t be contesting elections as long as J&K remained an union territory. 

His stance, however, is being perceived as a climbdown as nowhere did the chief minister mention restoration of Article 370 and Article 35A, the special provisions for the erstwhile state that were scrapped on 5 August last year. The IE piece even prompted the resignation of former NC minister Aga Ruhullah Mehdi, an influential Shia leader.  

In an interview to ThePrint Wednesday, Abdullah said the NC’s fight to reverse the 5 August decision had already begun. 

We were among the first to petition the Supreme Court on the issue. There are other parties that have not even bothered to go to the court. They will say that they will not accept what has been done but you haven’t even started the fight to reverse what has happened,” he told ThePrint. “We have at least taken the fight to the courts. I am asked why don’t you demand restoration of Article 370. Demand from whom? The government in Delhi has not changed. You are telling me that I should demand 370 from the same people who took it away? How is that logical?”

Abdullah asserted that his party will not accept the events of 5 August last year. I have made it very clear that I as an individual or the party do not accept what happened on the 5th of August,” he added. “We are fighting a battle by peaceful legal democratic means to reverse what happened on 5 August and we are hopeful that we will receive justice from the Supreme Court of India.”

The NC leader said some “journalists and activists” are by design misinterpreting him. There is an attempt being made to misrepresent what I have said and to misconstrue the words and the sentiment behind what I have said,” he said. “It is not perchance, it is by design. I guess some activists or journalists are unhappy I have not spoken to them and are quite happy to take words and spin them completely around. I wish journalists were in front of me. I would ask them to please show me in any of my interviews or my statements where I have said restoration of statehood trumps the fight against what happened on the fifth of August.”

Asked to elaborate on his decision not to contest elections, Abdullah said he doesn’t only fight to be an MLA but has also been his party’s CM candidate.

“Why on earth would I fight to be a CM of a UT when I have been CM of a state? Why would I accept the fact that tomorrow I won’t know who my DG would be? Forget DG, I can’t even decide who the DCs and SSPs in the districts would be,” he said. “I don’t want to be a disempowered CM. Therefore, I have made it clear that so long J&K is a UT, I will aspire to the office of CM and therefore will not fight an assembly election. But that’s not the same as saying that I accept what you have done to 370 and all I want is statehood. No No No.”

On Aga Ruhullah’s resignation, Abdullah said, “I haven’t spoken to him (Ruhullah). Ideally, he should have picked up the phone and spoken to me and said look this is what you have said and I disagree. The only regret I have is that it’s not what I said; it is the interpretation of what I said that he is reacting to. Which is unfortunate. Theek hai, ho jata hai (It’s alright. It happens).”

Also read: ‘Not allowed to meet daughter’ — Congress leader Soz says J&K lied in SC that he is free

‘Modi govt attempted to silence me’

Abdullah also said the Modi government presented him with a personal bond in October-November last year that required him to not speak on politics. 

He, however, added that he didn’t sign it. 

I wasn’t overtly asked to retire but I was presented with a bond that would have effectively, for the foreseeable future, ended my political career,” he said. “Because that bond said that I will not talk about anything that has happened in J&K after the 5 August 2019, which is unacceptable to me. So I kept the bond with me and I told the officer — he came very confident that I would sign it and had his rubber stamp ready — that I cannot sign this. You can do whatever you like.”  

The former J&K chief minister also responded to BJP general secretary Ram Madhav’s statements earlier this month questioning the local parties’ decision to stay silent and not re-initiate political activity.

“Mr Ram Madhav’s statement stems more from lack of understanding about what is happening here. He talks about political activity. What normal political activity will you do when people are locked up at homes?” he asked. “I am fighting a case in the High Court for 16 of my leaders because they are locked up in their homes. One of my senior colleagues was required to travel to Delhi the other day for a heart check up. It took more than 72 hours to get permission to travel to Delhi. His doctor had to intervene and on paper there is no detention order.” 

Abdullah also accused the BJP leader of “incentivising bloodshed” on the streets of Kashmir. “Mr Ram Madhav talked about Kashmiris having happily accepted what was done on 5 August because if they hadn’t they would have protested,” he said. “What are you doing? Are you trying to incentivise bloodshed on the streets here. Perhaps rightly Kashmiris responded with their heads and not their hearts because their hearts would have told them to go out and protest but their heads told them that going out and protesting will meet the same sort of result that we have seen in 2008, 2010 and 2016.” 

He added that the NC is yet to decide on its roadmap for the future and that it can only take place once the party’s working committee is able to meet.

Also read: Election Commission pulls up Jammu & Kashmir L-G Murmu for repeated remarks on polls

‘No point allying with national parties anymore’

Abdullah also expressed skepticism about allying with national parties in the future.

Left to me, there will be no alliances. What’s the point of an alliance that works one way. An alliance works both ways. You fight our cause, we will fight yours,” he said. “But honestly the way we expected our cause to be fought, it wasn’t. I mean one odd stray speech in Parliament doesn’t make a fight. There were times, and I say this with a heavy heart, that the US state department and the European parliament were saying more for us than our own friends and allies were. The statements that came from them were more forceful and more hard hitting than our own political friends.”

Asked if national leaders including Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi had reached out to him after his release, Abdullah spoke in detail about limiting expectations from political parties.

I spoke to Rahul (Gandhi) briefly after I got released but we were discussing more about detention and circumstances and all the rest of it. I have not had a political conversation centered around what happened in Jammu and Kashmir with anybody,” he said. “To be honest with you, there are very few parties I believe that will take a stand in favour of the people of J&K. I am not talking about association with NC. I am talking about finding common cause with what happened to us. I mean the DMK is there, the Left parties, occasionally Mamata Banerjee and her party have spoken up. There have been individual leaders from the Congress from time to time who have been critical of what happened, particularly Mr. Chidambaram and one or two others. But otherwise, having expectations from political parties. No.”

Abdullah also urged regional parties to take lessons from the developments in J&K.

Regional parties should be worried about what happened here. An unelected Governor usurped the powers of the legislative assembly and completely rewrote the constitutional relationship between J&K and the rest of the country,” he said. “What’s to stop governors in other parts of the country usurping the same powers of the assembly and rewriting those states for all time to come. Tomorrow, for example, if the Governor of Tamil Nadu decides he will take on the powers of the assembly and declare TN a UT then what will they do?”

‘Modi govt decision a vindication of Hurriyat stand’

Abdullah also said the Modi government’s decision to scrap Article 370 and abolish Article 35A has played right into the hands of the hardline Hurriyat Conference and “certainly made the lives of mainstream politicians in J&K difficult”.

Not only has it shrunk the space for the mainstream but it also reduced us to objects of ridicule. There were no shortage of voices that said ‘acha hua, keep them detained’,” he said. “They would point fingers at Dr Farooq Abdullah and say this is what you get for saying Bharat Mata ki Jai.” 

He added, “It was this constituency (separatists) constantly telling the people of Jammu and Kashmir that you cannot trust New Delhi, that you cannot trust India. We were the ones telling them to trust India, you will not be betrayed. Where have we been left?”

The NC leader said while there was no point in questioning J&K’s accession to India in 1947, his grandfather Sheikh Abdullah and other leaders who advocated the state’s merger with the Union of India would have felt disappointed and betrayed.

On the personal front, Abdullah said, he had lost contact with his children due to the communications blackout and it was only after three weeks that his sister and aunt came to visit him. I lost contact with children. But I wasn’t keen on exposing them to the humiliation here. It took three weeks before my sister and aunt came to see me and not for want of trying,” he said. 

Also read: Scrapping Article 370 was ‘marital rape’, assault on faith of J&K, says PDP’s Naeem Akhtar


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Posturing aside, what is the written or verbal assurance that Omar Abdullah and his father have given to Modi that has got them back to freedom, while Mehbooba Mufti is still under detention? I do not know how God intends to take care of the poor Kashmiris who are bearing the brunt of Modi’s unreasonable ambition or vision, but one thing is certain: Mehbooba Mufti by showing her stubbornness now, has atoned for the opportunism her father showed in tying up with the BJP in the first place. This will ensure the resurrection of the PDP and gradual or quick demise of Omar Abdullah’s party, whatever is its name, whenever the tide turns.

  2. Before Mr.Omar Abdullah tries for restoration of Article 370 he must know what action of his grandfather prompted Modi to choose August 5 for abrogating Article 370. I would have sent him a letter but the web site of JKNC is so defunct that it still shows his name as Chief minister of J &K. So let me clarify to him what happened on August 5 1938. At that time there was a party called Muslim Conference headed by S.M.Abdullah. It was in 1938 that the Muslim Conference (which later became the National Conference) gave the call for observing 5th August 1938 as Responsible Government day. This was a revolutionary step for the National Conference which till then was chiefly agitating for more jobs and other facilities for Muslims changed tack and started agitating for the change from feudal rule by a Hindu Maharajah to a responsible government in which all people of the State irrespective of caste,creed or religion would be stake holders. Some Hindus and Sikhs including Jia Lal Kilam, Kashyap Bandhu and Sardar Budh Singh supported this demand and took part in Drafting the National Demands Document.This led to a National Demands agitation which was supported by All India States People Conference led by Jawaharlal Nehru. The National Demands document was adopted first by the people of Rajkot and then by people of many other Princely States kick starting a struggle for responsible government in all Princely States. The movement against feudal rule and the anger against feudal rulers was according to Ian Copland used by Patel and Menon to persuade the rulers of Princely States ruled by Hindu Rulers to submit to the rule of a secular Congress. RSS , BJP and other parties that want a Hindu Rashtra have never forgotten that Hindu Maharajahs were integrated with a secular India by Nehru.These people consider the 5th August Responsible Government Day celebrated on 5th August 1938 in Kashmir as responsible for the ultimate replacement of Hindu Rule by a secular rule.The Malegaon episode shows that this thought is very much alive today. Hence the choice of 5th August by RSS and its offshoots for abrogating Article 370
    and fragmenting and destroying the Jammu and Kashmir State. This is just like Mountbatten choosing 15 August for giving Independence to India because Japan had surrendered to the allied commander on 15th August and he thus gave vent to his feelings on leaving India.

    IAN COPLAND “The Integration of The Princely States: A Bloodless Revolution ? in D.A.Low,Howard Brasted(Eds) (1998) Freedom, Trauma,Continuities, Northern India and Independence. Sage Publications New Delhi, California, London ISBN 817036-680-1. pages 153-173

    SHEIKH ABDULLAH- A BIOGRAPHY ( The Crucial Period 1905-1939) By Syed Taffazull Hussain. Available for free download at Google Books pages 277-290 and page 302

  3. Omar was a little boy when his father Faroukh Abdullah rigged the elections in 1987 knowing fully well that Shabir Shah’s party would have won it. He professed separatism no doubt but he was no militant and was prepared to stand for elections. Had he won he would have to take oath under the constitution to become the Chief Minister. This would have made him accept that J&K was part of India. Eventoday Shabir is a pacifist and does not support militancy.
    Sad that Rajiv Gandhi fell for Faroukh’s fear mongering and acceded to the rigging. The truth is that Farokh wanted to continue being the playboy CM.

    • How can Farook Abdullahs’s actions be the justification for abrogating an article of the Constitution of India?

  4. Omar Abdullah seems to have become wiser but Modi hater journos are continue to live a hopeless life.


Comments are closed.

Most Popular