On 3 November, over 100 million Americans will stand in long lines and cast their vote for the next President of the United States. The choice of candidates is the same for all American voters – Donald Trump, Joe Biden and, in some states, Kanye West. But, all voters will not follow the same process for casting their vote.
An American in the largest state of California can show up at her polling centre without any documents and will be allowed to vote. Her fellow American in the state of Wisconsin will have to carry a valid photo identity card to be allowed to vote. A voter in the state of Connecticut will be asked for an identity card at the polling centre but if she does not have one, will still be allowed to vote. While a voter in Arizona must present an identity card to be allowed to vote, it doesn’t need to have a photo. The bewildering array of differences in voting rules across different states for the same US Presidential election does not end with the identity card.
Voters in New York will be given a ballot and asked to choose any one of the candidates. But voters in the neighbouring state of Maine are required to rank each candidate in their order of priority, not choose just one of them. For electing the President of their country, New York and most other states follow the first-past-the-post electoral system while Maine has adopted the rank-choice voting system. Further, most states transfer 100 per cent of their electoral college votes to the winner of the popular vote in their state, but in Maine and Nebraska, the electoral college votes are transferred based on proportion of the total votes secured by each candidate in their state. So, 3 November will be different for different Americans, albeit the end goal will be the same for all – to elect a President.
Also read: US presidential candidate can win even without majority of popular vote. Here’s why
Things missing from India’s ‘to-emulate’ list
Arguably, electing its President every four years is the most important responsibility for America as a democratic nation. Yet, the 50 different states of America have neither felt the need nor have been coerced into drafting one set of uniform laws and processes to undertake their most important task as a democracy. Evidently, “one nation, one election” is not a necessary condition to be a successful democracy.
America’s economic success is often attributed to many of its virtues such as democracy, institutions, strong leaders, free society, etc. India’s elite (that is, readers of this publication) adore America and justifiably so. They want India to emulate America’s economic policies and its other values. Some of India’s Americophiles even want India to adopt their political systems – from the Presidential form of governance to the television debate-style individual-centric elections, in the misguided belief that these are causal factors for America’s success. But the most glaring American virtue of fierce federalism and strident decentralisation is often conspicuously missing from the list of virtues to emulate for India.
American states have the freedom to even frame their own rules to elect their President. Unsurprisingly, American states also have the freedom to determine the curriculum that their children will study, set their own tax rates, formulate their own environmental laws and so on.
Contrast that with states in India that do not even have a right to taxation any longer, which is the most basic right for any democratically elected government. Goods and Services Tax (GST) was the longest nail in the coffin of India’s federalism, by removing exclusive powers of the states to tax. But GST was hailed by India’s policy elite for its promise of ‘efficiency’ by eliminating multiple tax rates across various states. Similarly, the recent centripetal forces of a ‘one nation, one election’, ‘one nation, one curriculum’, ‘one nation, one ration’, ‘one nation, one tax’, ‘one nation, one entrance examination’ and so on, are all being justified in the utilitarian philosophy of efficiency with blatant disregard to the long-term damage of centralisation. The sins of centralisation can be profound and long-lasting in a politically, economically and culturally diverse nation such as India.
Also read: Modi’s simultaneous polls plan is like changing river course to control traffic on bridge
The most important lesson
Decentralisation of powers across states and local governments foster a competitive marketplace. Competition is the cornerstone for a market economy, something that India’s elite cherish. When states compete with each other, it leads to more efficient outcomes for the nation as a whole. States could compete with each other in taxes, laws, education, environment and a host of other factors. Lest one forget, the intense competition among the southern states of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh in the late ’80s and early ’90s helped India blossom as one of the world’s largest exporters of information technology services.
Conducting a national election with 50 different rules and electoral processes for 50 states can be deemed ‘inefficient’ and the temptation to ‘clean’ it all up with one ‘national’ law can be irresistible. Yet, the ability of America to resist this very temptation of short-term efficiency benefits at the cost of decentralisation is perhaps the most important of all American ideals, but much less talked about. On 3 November, the most important American virtue for India to emulate will not just be its rich democratic traditions, but also how 50 different states with different sets of rules can come together to accomplish a national objective, without having to sacrifice their powers or differences.
To paraphrase C. Rajagopalachari – ‘Do not impose uniformity in the garb of unity.’
The author a political economist & senior office bearer of the Congress party. Views are personal.
[11/20, 11:51 PM] Shivam Singh: You must be kidding, while writing this article and not mentioning election expenditure once. Election expenditure of 2019 Loksabha election was 55000 Crore rupees, you heard me right $8 billion of which something 3500 Crore was spent by government on election management. Now trying adding the expenditure of many different elections in many different states? Can you even guess!
We desperately need one nation one election to save the expense and time the incumbent government spends in organising different elections which should be used in making better policy for the sustainable development. PM & CMs are busy in campaigning, so when are they going to get the time for their actual job. Also don’t forget to consider the population of both countries and losses incurred by the production companies on the day of elections.
You must be kidding, while writing this article and not mentioning election expenditure once. Election expenditure of 2019 Loksabha election was 55000 Crore rupees, you heard me right $8 billion of which something 3500 Crore was spent by government on election management. Now trying adding the expenditure of many different elections in many different states. ?? Can you even guess!.
We need one nation one election to save the expense and time the incumbent government spends on different different election campaigns and all which should be used on better policy making for tgr sustainable development. Government /PM/ CMs are busy in campaigning, so when are they going to get time for their actual job…. In the end don’t forget to consider the population of both countries and losses incurred by the manufacturers on the day of election.
I didn’t think india want’s American style election system. India is big country and because some people wants USA system doesn’t mean 1 billion want’s.
Is it people of India who want US-style govt system, or just Modi and BJP?
Indias policy is far better than USA. There are more opportunities to defraud in american system.
, it doesn’t have a single state which says outsiders are not allowed like earlier J&K. So don’t even compare two. I will leave rest of it to your knowledge to compare both.
Abe wo bewakoof, it doesn’t have a single state which says outsiders are not allowed like earstwile J&K. So don’t even compare two.
India wanting US style government doesn’t meaning India should adopt all the practices in USA.
An excellent piece..since the Hon. PM had called for One Nation One Election,I have had read so many articles but never got a detailed n instructive like this one.
It’s quite sure that India isn’t a complete federal nation. But over the years even the Quasi federal spirit of India has been undermined. Without reviving and further strengthening the federal system ,one cannot anticipate a stable India in any front.
True . The words of Rajaji rings very very true in the passing remarks .
Hope : Congress must also follow through this also and not cling to Gandhi Family “only”.
Thats the biggest mistake they are making . It still has too many Bright State Leaders , Let them shine through and don’t stop through ranks .
Comments are closed.