The Narendra Modi government has set up 11 empowered groups to plan, implement and communicate in the face of the Covid-19 crisis and lockdown (representational image) | Photo: ANI
The Narendra Modi government has set up 11 empowered groups to plan, implement and communicate in the face of the Covid-19 crisis and lockdown (representational image) | Photo: ANI
Text Size:

At the start of the month, I argued in my piece that the fastest scalable solution to India’s Covid-19 challenge was to employ digital technology for diagnosis and for contact tracing. Happily since then the Narendra Modi government has launched the Aarogya Setu app which does both, and the number of downloads has been climbing rapidly.

Now, I would like to spell out the logic of contact tracing and explain why one should think of digital contact tracing as conferring a new form of immunity – digital immunity.


Also read: Republicans on US House panel accuse WHO of siding with China, helping spread ‘propaganda’


Understanding the spread

Epidemiology 101. The simplest understanding of how Covid-19 spreads: each infected person in turn infects a number of others. An average value of this number is the infamous R0 – the basic reproduction number. For Covid-19, R0 appears to be roughly 3 in the course of life as it was prior to the pandemic. Over 13 rounds of infections, this would be expected to turn one starting case (“patient zero”) into 3, 9, 27…..and eventually 3^13 cases which is roughly 1.5 million cases.

As each new infection has to develop (“incubate”) for roughly a week before the patient can infect others, one should expect that over the course of 13 weeks since 1 January, we would be roughly where we are today worldwide – with about a million-and-a-half cases.

Currently, we are engaged in a vast, global exercise of reducing R0 by lowering contacts in daily life, better known as social distancing. If you don’t get physically close enough to others, you cannot give them the disease if you have it or contract it if they have it.


Also read: WHO and China covered Tedros’ past — but what is worrying is how India fell for it


Limitations of lockdowns

As a thought experiment, perfect social distancing over a month should eliminate the disease – existing cases will reach their conclusions and no fresh ones will begin. But this thought experiment cannot be truly realised as it is too tough to implement. And so even in locked down geographies, such as India and New Jersey where I live, we are looking at restarting a less constrained life. This will lead to a situation in which some unlucky people will restart fresh chains of infection.

We would be spared this outcome if, magically, a vaccine were to become available today. The vaccine would not have to work for every single person nor would everyone need to be vaccinated. It would be sufficient for a bit more than two thirds of the population to become immune as a result of the vaccine, for at this point, less than one third would still be susceptible to the disease.

Each new “patient zero” would only pass on the disease, on average, to less than a third of R0 before vaccination, which is to say less than one, ensuring that the number of infections could no longer grow. We would have developed “herd immunity”.


Also read: China clamps down on research tracing Covid-19 origins, will strictly scrutinise all papers


Power of smartphones

This particular magic is not possible, but another trick very much lies in our hands – literally – is the ubiquitous smartphone. The smartphone can be used to develop, almost immediately, a new form of herd immunity – digital herd immunity or simply digital immunity. This may seem odd – a smartphone cannot make a given person immune to Covid-19, unlike a vaccination shot. But it can make the herd immune to developing an epidemic in precisely the same sense in which vaccination does.

The way this works is to turbo-charge the venerable public health measures of identifying exposed people who can then take measures to avoid infecting others while seeking treatment and rest for themselves. Contact tracing followed by quarantine in the jargon of the trade.


Also read: China reports 108 new Covid-19 cases, death toll climbs to 3,341


Contact tracing

To see how this can be highly effective for Covid-19, consider a very simplified description of the course of the illness.

People who contract the disease will become contagious after 5 days. Of these (pessimistically) half will not develop any symptoms till they recover at the end of two weeks. The other half will develop symptoms after three days. Now in our thought experiment, a new patient zero who develops symptoms immediately self-isolates and is tested/treated. They are no longer a danger to the rest of the herd.

We are also quickly able to trace everyone who had problematic contact with the new patient zero over the past three days when they were contagious. And these people, who have not yet had a chance to infect others, also self-isolate, get tested and depending on the result resume normal life or get treated for the disease. They too are no longer a danger to the rest of the herd.

That leaves patient zeros without symptoms. They will, indeed, pass the disease on to 3 others, say. But of these, very likely, at least one will show symptoms. Once that person is identified, we work backwards and test their contacts and find patient zero. Then forwards to find others who had contact with patient zero. Isolate/test/treat – and we are done.

Bottom line: With accurate and quick contact tracing, patient zero cannot seed a new epidemic, exactly as if the population were vaccinated. Indeed, the analogy is even better. Not all contacts need to be traced. For parameters appropriate to Covid-19, me and my team estimate using a simple ‘branching tree model’ which suggests that as long as about 90 per cent of the contacts can be traced, no epidemic can grow. The herd has immunity.

My team that is working with me on the ‘branching tree model’ includes Vir Bulchandani, Saumya Shivam and Sanjay Moudgalya (all three are graduate students in Theoretical Physics at Berkeley, Princeton and Princeton respectively). I am also being helped by Shoibal Chakravarty, Fellow at the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru.


Also read: Why Covid-19 is a 100-year chance to shake up debt and taxes


Digital solution: the way forward

Now for the digital part. As already shown in practice in various East Asian countries, smartphones can run apps that allow all of us to record the times and places where we had potentially problematic contact with others – periods when we were closer than 6 feet for more than 10 minutes for example. More precisely, they can record this information for all other people who also install and run the app – members of this mutual assistance society. If the membership of this mutual assistance society exceeds the digital herd immunity threshold – 90 per cent in our scenario – the herd now has digital immunity.

Getting to the digital immunity threshold in India involves two challenges. The first is to encourage widespread adoption of the Arogya Setu app among smartphone users.

The second is to include feature phone users in the same contact tracing system. The most immediate way to do this is by combining cell tower based location and time information, old fashioned interviews and broadcasting SMS warnings.

A more discriminate solution would be to distribute robust and inexpensive devices which have been adapted to only run the needed app with automatic access to mobile phone networks. These could, for example, be old donated smartphones. With some effort on all three axes, the problem can be solved.

Biological immunity to Covid-19 will take some time, but digital immunity is possible today.

The author is Professor of Physics at Princeton University and is working on India’s coronavirus challenges with a group of students, postdocs and faculty. Views are personal.

ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

7 Comments Share Your Views

7 COMMENTS

  1. What to do with those who still insist on “WON’T SHOW PAPERs”. These people would ultimately die without showing their identity as if they didn’t exist in this world.

  2. “‘Aarogya Setu’s not all that healthy for a person’s privacy’”
    https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/software/aarogya-setus-not-all-that-healthy-for-a-persons-privacy/articleshow/75112687.cms

    “Fishing with dynamite: India’s contact tracing overreach”
    https://the-ken.com/story/fishing-with-dynamite-indias-contact-tracing-overreach/

    “The Indian government’s ambitions, though, fly in the face of best practices being espoused by foreign governments. The European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union, advised against processing data on location or movement of individuals in its recommendations on using technology to combat Covid-19.
    And these practices become all the more egregious when one realises there are better ways to go about it.”

    The app is a poorly designed solution to a real problem; unless the govt. really does want to harvest data that has no applicability to contact tracing. There are better solutions available right now, and the govt. can, hopefully, will, do better than this.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here