Monday, February 6, 2023
HomeOpinionAsking for consent is revolutionary in Pakistan. That is why Aurat March...

Asking for consent is revolutionary in Pakistan. That is why Aurat March is creating ripples

Next time a man asks me why Pakistani women only complain instead of doing something, I will happily shove pictures from the Aurat March in his face.

Text Size:

I couldn’t help but think about my younger sister zealously informing me, “the etymology of the word ‘aurat‘ is misogynistic.”

The etymological roots of ‘aurat‘ give us meanings that range from ‘vulnerability’ to ‘genitals’, and later, to ‘wife’, thus reducing women to, of course, their weakness, reproductive organs and their relation to husbands.

I was not surprised at the revelation, but definitely amused, for the phenomenon is not unique to our language. The word ‘woman’ can also be traced back to the meaning ‘little man’. And ‘woman’, too, later became used to indicate ‘wife’.

Building our vocabulary

When I saw that the mobilisers were using ‘aurat’ instead of ‘women’, the distinction meant everything to me. While the choice to label what is obviously a women’s march in local terms may seem pedantic to some, it has strong bearings on how South Asian activists and feminists can and will vernacularise the fight for women’s rights.

It is no secret that feminism is often co-opted by many to be viewed as a Western construct which marginalises non-Western identities. Western hegemony over feminist movements then feeds into a repulsion towards feminism that is found in countries such as Pakistan.

View this post on Instagram

Aurat power at Aurat March

A post shared by Aurat March 2020 (@auratmarch) on

We have grassroot feminist efforts working on the question of gender, yet we still lack a vernacular that can be used to refer to issues of gender inequality.

While our languages are extremely evocative in expressing the full range of human emotion, it is a shame that we still have to rely on words such as ‘zyadti‘ (excess) or ‘zina-bil-jabr‘ (adultery by force) or ‘asmat-dari‘ (defloration) to refer to incidents such as rape.

With the Aurat March, terms such as ‘pidar shahi’ (patriarchy) and ‘aurat march’ are being circulated and created.

Slogans such as “ghar ka kaam, sab ka kaam“, “khud khana garam karo“, “consent ki tasbeeh roz parhein” and — my favourite — “paratha rolls, not gender roles” give a local flavour to the ways we can talk about feminism and gender.

Also read: The people’s occupation of Shaheen Bagh speaks truth to power

A visual repertoire

I understand that the need to ask for consent and examine gendered roles may not be part of public discourse in Pakistan, which is why this is definitely a step in the right direction.

The crowdsourced production of vocabulary, with signs and slogans, that can be used to speak of women’s rights and issues, is part of the revolutionary impact that the Aurat March has.

Even on the level of visual aesthetics, the March broke through conventions in the best ways. In Karachi, brilliant women were seen escorting “pidarshahi ka janaza” (the funeral procession of patriarchy).

View this post on Instagram

Patriarchy ka janaaza bari shaan sey nikla!!!

A post shared by Aurat March 2020 (@auratmarch) on

Not only does this deserve high points for creative resistance, but just the sight of women carrying a janazah through the streets of Pakistan is revolutionary, for women are rarely, if ever, seen as pallbearers of a funeral casket.

Even funeral processions lay down many restrictions for women. At Asma Jahangir’s funeral, where men and women were seen praying together, eyebrows were raised over women’s presence and participation in the ceremony.

This visual of patriarchy’s funeral not only gave way for symbolic resistance, but it also questions notions of acceptability and female visibility in our customs, and imagines new possibilities of challenging these gender discriminatory rules.

Awake the whole time

Most importantly, women’s mobilisation in the form of the Aurat March banishes the belief that women are not conscious of their own oppression.

The idea that women are complicit in maintaining the status quo that decrees them second-class status and are unwilling or unprepared to fight for their rights utterly ignores the protective features of internalised misogyny.

Indeed, I have never met a woman who does not possess the awareness that this world is unjust to women. It is only a matter of varying circumstances and approaches when it comes to what women choose to do about it.

Women are always resisting against patriarchal forces in their own ways: sometimes subtle, at times overt. For a lot of Pakistani women, mere survival is resistance.

And occasionally, in a glorious, glorious feat, women are able to come together to lay patriarchy to rest on the streets of Islamabad, Karachi and Lahore.

The next time a man asks me why Pakistani women only complain instead of doing something, I will, with all due — but not deserved — respect, happily shove pictures from the Aurat March in his face. So, #comeatmemeninists.

Work, work, work, work, work, work…

And, make no mistake, this form of female public resistance and mobilisation requires an incredible amount of physical, psychological and emotional labour.

View this post on Instagram

Literally, emotionally and physically because my day starts at six thirty, i spent all workday on my feet prepping for different extracurriculars, rushed to my old college to speak at the @wesfccu conference, where we saw a beautiful video interview and tribute to asma jahangir, drove to the mall, walked for the next forty minutes with a big bag of snacks and juice to hand out and shouted a lot of naray, and spent the evening caught up in fam commitments. And yet my most tiring days are and will always be easier than most days are for most women in this country; when you speak about rights, never forget the women who don't have your privilege. I hope there is ever more diversity at next year's march. #auratmarch Quote by @nayyirah.waheed Picture by @inmyshoespakistan

A post shared by Yusra Amjad (@yusraamjadwrites) on

When the structure of society is rigged against the mere idea of women gathering outside the home, when all institutions of society are colluding with each other behind your backs, in fact on your backs, to keep you entrapped in the restricted role it has inscribed for you, pulling off an endeavour such as the Aurat March is no easy task.

I cannot imagine the anxieties of the organisers, who, on top of the hurdles that come with organising a massive event, must have been plagued by security concerns. These women did the work that was necessary, but it could by no means have been easy.

Also read: Shaheen Bagh, Jamia, JNU protests show Indian women are far better leaders than we admit

Realising barriers

I can only imagine the number of women and girls who had to fight their family members to attend the March, who had to seek permission to fight for their humanisation. I can only empathise with those who were barred from attending.

And then there are those women who had to make arrangements to delegate their tasks and duties in order to mark themselves present at the March.

I can only imagine the enraged and enlivened sentiments of women who were unable to go, for whatever reason, and wanted nothing else but to be among the throngs of women, imagining the banners they would have carried had they been able to march alongside their comrades.

I am sure there are women right now who are already making plans to attend next year’s marches, who are hyped and ready to dismantle the misogynistic foundations of our country. There are those right now who can envision the possibility of marching from more cities.

Inheriting the struggle

Events like the March allow women to create opportunities for themselves, and lead from the front. It is occasions like the Aurat March that put to shame anyone who believes that women make for weak leaders or cannot be leaders.

It is unfortunate that the proponents of such opinions are one too many, and it is truly ironic that these conclusions are made without ever considering women’s potential to lead.

A woman’s rally in Lahore protesting against the Zia dictatorship is baton-charged by the police (1980) | Dawn

None of this is to say that women’s mobilisation in Pakistan is somehow unprecedented. The unrelenting resistance by Pakistani women against Zia’s regime is imprinted on Pakistan’s historical memory and the iconic chadar burning protests are a canonical visual in Pakistan’s history of feminism.

Pakistani women have always been resisting, and public gatherings such as the March bear testament.

Also read: In 2020, don’t rely on routine rallies and marches. Modi’s India needs new ways to protest

When women mobilise, things happen

Not because we’re mothers of the earth, or some God-ordained, socially and emotionally intelligent creatures with special ‘women’s skills’. It is simply because we’re a good half of the population, and it is time for us to claim equal footing in this world.

In a society where women are told to disappear inside their houses — and then even disappear from their houses on the arrival of male guests, where women are told not to be loud, told that they must accept things as they are, the visual of women going out on the streets — chanting, shouting, dancing, marching, leading, fighting — is remarkable.

The march reignited my hope in a world where gender ceases to become grounds for marginalisation. With every woman and chant, it instructed me to keep my rage alive, budding and burning.

It screamed to me that the fight had only just begun, and yet had simultaneously been alive for centuries. It promised me that, in the years to come, the crowds will grow bigger, the representation will get better, the voices will grow louder.

But, for now, let us all chant:

Jab tak aurat tang rahegi, jang rahegi, jang rahegi!

Also read: Imran Khan hates feminism because he wants women to just make gol rotis & have gori skin

Zuneera Shah is an undergraduate student at Harvard University, studying government & gender studies. Views are personal.

This article was originally published on

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Why do you think she she finds ‘aurat’ and not ‘woman’ misogynistic? She explicitly says the “phenomenon is not unique to our language” and then points out it is so in English where women meant “little men”and woman went on to indicate wife. Looks like you read the first line, got upset and wrote your comment that attacked her American education. Interesting that the author predicted such reactions, which you would’ve known if you read the article:

    “It is no secret that feminism is often co-opted by many to be viewed as a Western construct which marginalises non-Western identities. Western hegemony over feminist movements then feeds into a repulsion towards feminism that is found in countries such as Pakistan.”
    Such as but not exclusive to Pakistan, i might add.

  2. I really do not know whether the term “AURAT” etymologically means what the author says but I do know that the term “WOMAN” is definitely etymologically linked to the term “MEN”. Any number of imaginative stories can be created around it.
    So, for another American trained liberal, I would like to point out why WOMAN is not misogynistic while AURAT is? Is it because English is a western or a holier language which is devoid of misogyny?
    Language is language used to convey emotions & meaning. It is not the fault of the words created by humans and every word, good or bad, has its role in communication. So, nitpicking over which word should be used, as long as the meaning remains the same, just shows that studying at Harvard does not bring about maturity.
    This is what we find surprising about left liberals. Their arguments are inherently illogical and devoid of basis in reality i.e if you can get your head around their long winded arguments and senseless use of vocabulary.

Comments are closed.