Illustration by Soham Sen | ThePrint
Text Size:

There was both a buzz and a hush among the front rows at Rashtrapati Bhavan as Sushma Swaraj walked in to sit in the front row with the most distinguished visitors, not head for the imposing platform where the new ministers were seated for the swearing-in. In her large fan club, there was still a hope. Surely, Narendra Modi couldn’t afford to go into his second term without his most popular minister.

Her health challenges are no secret. She, in fact, broke an old taboo in Indian public life by revealing — on Twitter — that she was undergoing a kidney transplant. She had handled her recovery very well.

On a new kidney, her immune system still getting used to it, she took on the Pakistanis at the UN, held meetings with her counterparts from across the world, and presented a picture of incredible poise and dignity. Never did a loose word or expression escape her, never a shot fired in anger or exasperation.

She made it her instrument to build an entirely new kind of diplomacy, reaching out to her compatriots across the world. Her rivals and sceptics did snigger that with Narendra Modi running all of foreign policy, all she was left with was to resolve passport-visa-immigration issues on Twitter. If there were times when this bordered on being the overseas Indian’s agony aunt, she didn’t mind it.

In the Modi cabinet, no minister had a really great deal. Hers was a particularly tough one. The prime minister got much global limelight and glory, and she ungrudgingly made way for him. She, never short on charm, repartee and media adulation, had the old political smarts to read this writing on the wall. She stepped back, into a back-room role, and never uttered a word about him other than praise.

Having known her since 1977, the year we both started our careers in the same small city of Chandigarh, she in politics as the youngest cabinet minister in Devi Lal’s Janata Party government at just 25, and I as a city reporter with The Indian Express, I know her to possess more fortitude and self-respect than most politicians. I am still not quite sure how she would have absorbed the new turn in her 42-year political career where she received applause as a visitor while her party’s third government took oath. Particularly when her successor was S. Jaishankar, who had served under her for his entire tenure as foreign secretary (2015-18), and as ambassador to the US before that.

Maybe she would have drawn on her phenomenal inner strength and taken it philosophically. She also knew that this ‘turn’ wasn’t merely a turn, but probably the conclusion of her remarkable political journey.


Also readModi era begins in politics as caste factor fades. Here’s why he won’t be easy to beat


Although she was born in an RSS family in Ambala — her father was a prominent RSS functionary — she was first noticed as a defiant young lawyer for George Fernandes when he was arrested in the Baroda Dynamite Case during the Emergency.

Since Fernandes was a socialist, and as was Swaraj Kaushal, the fellow lawyer she married in the thick of their anti-Emergency activism, she somehow acquired the aura of a fellow traveller. But she will remind you that her essential beliefs were of the RSS and the rest was just some popular misconception by socialist association. In 1977, as the Emergency ended and Indira Gandhi’s Congress was routed, and she became Haryana’s minister for labour and employment at 25, she was seen as a rising Janata Party star and Fernandes protege, not an RSS/Jana Sangh native.

Quite remarkably, especially for a self-made woman in Indian politics of the 1970s, she became president of the Janata Party in Haryana at 27. But once the Janata broke up later in 1979, she gravitated formally towards the breakaway Jana Sangh group. Her rise from thereon, as a self-made non-dynast, was phenomenal.

She did much to convince us that she had bought into BJP’s conservatism, from banishing the dancing Ajanta Apsara from national calendars, to banning FTV, railing against condom ads for “obscenity”, protesting against the ‘Sexy Radha’ song from Student of the Year, the explicit scenes of lesbian love between Shabana Azmi and Nandita Das playing sisters-in-law ‘Radha’ and ‘Sita’ in Deepa Mehta’s Fire, and more recently her views on surrogacy and her description of a rape victim as “zinda laash” (a living corpse). But that won’t make her your usual, regressive, BJP conservative.

There are a dozen aspects of her life and track record that tell you she is different. She led a very middle-class, mainstream life, made her own personal choices when few in that milieu would, and relentlessly pushed at her party’s glass ceiling, reinforced through generations of patriarchy, not in the least because its parent, the RSS, is all-male in its hierarchy.

Her fame and pre-eminence didn’t come easy. Often it meant putting her hand up to take up the toughest challenges at a young age. As she did to take over as Delhi’s chief minister at the peak of the onion crisis. Or in volunteering to take on Sonia Gandhi in Bellary in 1999. She fought well, lost, but her point was made. She learnt Kannada in no time, built quick linkages and goodwill and made a significant contribution to her party’s first southern conquest.

She wasn’t afraid to speak out when the most abhorrent form of Hindu conservatism erupted in Mangalore and young women were being pulled out of bars and thrashed for “immorality”. She spoke out for freedom of choice and safety as a modern, independent woman and the mother of a young woman. Some in her party frowned, but she was letting her rapidly growing fan club know that she was different.


Also read: 12 reasons why Modi-Shah’s BJP got the better of Congress & everyone else


Sushma had made it known well in time that she was opting out when she announced she wasn’t going to contest this year. As one who fought 11 direct elections for states and Parliament, she would never avoid a good fight, especially at an age so young — just 66 now. But health had been her challenge, a consequence of early diabetes. Her departure, therefore, was planned and dignified. The only thing I might have suggested was a formal statement at some earlier stage that she was not going to join the new cabinet.

That said, even her adversaries would acknowledge that she completes her career as a winner, and a party faithful. She was an Advani acolyte but, after the 2009 rout when he was refusing to make way for the new generation, she unhesitatingly joined the party’s good “gang of four” (with Venkaiah Naidu, Ananth Kumar and Arun Jaitley) to call on RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat to intervene and choose a young party president. That brought in Nitin Gadkari.

This, despite the worst-kept secret in national politics — about her rivalry with Jaitley. For the party’s sake, they made common cause. There were times these past five years when she may have felt slighted, overlooked or passed over by the PMO. But those with their ear to the Lutyens’ ground did not miss the significance of when Modi chose her over Jaitley to stand in for him while he was overseas and his usual number two, Rajnath Singh, was in China. He asked her to be in Delhi rather than on her pre-planned visit to Dubai.

This was acknowledgement of the trust he had in her judgement as well as loyalty. It was also the peak of her political career. You could always debate what would have happened if the BJP/RSS had chosen her as that young leader of the future after Advani. She is, after all, younger than Narendra Modi. What kind of BJP would she have had then? Probably not as ideologically conservative as what we have now. But unlikely to be as cohesive and united either.

It’s a good discussion, but academic. In politics, as in cricket, every star cannot end up as Kapil Dev or Sachin Tendulkar. Somebody will have to play Rahul Dravid too, indispensable but denied the fullest fame and power. That’s a fair description for Sushma Swaraj, the leader, if you’d forgive me this bit of pop sociology.


Also readUnder Modi, a resurgent middle India is coming to smash the Left-liberals’ ivory bunkers


 

ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

19 Comments Share Your Views

19 COMMENTS

  1. Covered every aspect and most of the memories of her parliament times. One more intriguing was mocking UPA in last session of 2013 that ” by next year they’ll be on the treasury side”. Such was her confidence and fierce oratory. A lady who raised standards wherever she served.

  2. Did she not say that she will shave her head,if Sonia becomes PM? Sonia is more Indian than this lady , in being sober and restrained? And what about alleged connection with Lalith Modi?

  3. Kudos to you for a touching tribute to one f the greatest women politicians in India. Our first meeting in 1978 for work, led to more personal connections, with her and Swaraj Kaushal. The time we spent as a foursome, the Chai pe charcha, was a lesson in learning for us, the corporate couple, in awe of a firebrand youngster and her ever supportive husband. We watched every step of her dignified walk, in the courtyard of Rashtrapati Bhavan, with a lump in the throat. Get well soon Sushamaji, India needs you even in your ‘Vanaprasthashram”

  4. Do you really not know that the Swayamsevak Sangh is only for men and that there is a parallel organisation for women, the Sevika Samiti?

  5. Sounds like she should be the next head of the RSS? She has a lot to offer to the next generation of budding leaders from that part of Indian politics. I’m sure there are parallels to Rahul Dravid here too… More so, that would be a meaningful glass ceiling to break.

  6. Nice article. The comparison with Rahul Dravid seems fair and apt. Though her immense capability has largely been ignored and under utilized by this government, she has never complained. After Vajpayee, I always felt either Pramod Mahajan or Sushma Swaraj would one day be Prime Minister. Unfortunately, it was not to be. She would have been a very fine PM. Anyway, she has stood tall throughout her political career and deserves a great applause.

  7. Why does the word- Retirement, not exist among us- Indians. Why do we take things so negatively if we are sidelined to make way for the next generation.

  8. Was Sushma Swaraj the I&B minister who banned cuss words on TV? Watching movies (esp English ones) on TV is never quite the same.
    (Now they have warnings on screen whenever any one smoking/drinking is shown– PC gone mad.)

  9. Excellent piece on Sushma Swaraj for those who did not know her enough.Let us not find fault with the author,

  10. Ab ki baar Atal Bihari, Agli baar Behen hamari. That was not meant to be. Fine tribute. One still rememers her telling Dr Singh in the Lok Sabha, Tu idhar udhar ki na baat kar … Another moment when she displayed sound judgment was in opposing the appointment of the controversial CVC, overruled by Dr Singh and Mr Chidambaram, only to have the apex court strike down their decision. How much contribution she could have made to Indian foreign policy, if permitted to do so, lies in the realm of speculation. More runs are scored, wickets taken, if all eleven players are stretched to their full potential.

  11. Sushma Swaraj’s exit from the cabinet in a sense marks the symbolic end of the Advani era in BJP, unless Arun Jaitley makes a comeback. But the ‘gang of four’ had Modified themselves quite quickly, Sushma Swaraj being the last one to hold out.

  12. Another beautiful historical writeup from Shekhar ji. Thanks. Not sure why you didn’t mention what her husband had publicly expressed on twitter in Nov 2018:

    “Madam – Thank you very much for your decision not to contest any more elections. I remember there came a time when even Milkha Singh stopped running.” “This marathon has been on since 1977 – that is 41 years.” “I am also running behind you for the last 47 years. I am no longer a 19 years old. Please – I am also running out of breath. Thank you.”

    • Excellent comment, Ma’am – your’re spot-on about Shekhar Gupta’s article. And reading the tweet again made one feel so good.

  13. Lovely piece, but with one blemish. You seem to equate ‘conservative’ with ‘regressive’ and that’s quite not correct.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here