Supreme Court of India | Photo: Manisha Mondal | ThePrint
Supreme Court of India | Photo: Manisha Mondal | ThePrint
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has issued a press release denying reports that Justices Rohinton Nariman and D.Y. Chandrachud have asked the in-house committee probing the sexual harassment charges against Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi not to continue proceedings without the involvement of the complainant.

The Indian Express reported Sunday that the two Supreme Court judges met the head of the panel, Justice S.A. Bobde, Friday evening and asked the committee not to continue proceedings ‘ex parte’, after the complainant last week refused to be part of the proceedings due to what she termed the “frightening” atmosphere of the committee.

“It is most unfortunate that a leading newspaper has chosen to state that Justice R.F. Nariman and Justice D.Y. Chandrachud together met Justice S.A. Bobde on Friday evening i.e. on 3 May 2019. This is wholly incorrect. The in-house committee which is deliberating on the issue concerning Hon’ble Chief Justice of India deliberates on its own without any input from any other hon’ble judge of this court,” the press release signed by the Supreme Court’s secretary general said.

The in-house committee, led by Justice Bobde and also including Justices Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee, is probing allegations made by the former employee of the Supreme Court that CJI Gogoi sexually harassed her in October last year.

The Express report said that Justice Chandrachud had written to the panel members on 2 May that the credibility of the Supreme Court would be further damaged if they decided to continue with the probe in the absence of the complainant. He also reportedly suggested that the committee could either accede to the complainant’s request to provide her with a lawyer or appoint an amicus curiae for the probe.

Why the case is serious

Last Tuesday, after the committee’s third hearing, the complainant said she would take no further part in the inquiry proceedings, since the judges did not seem to appreciate that “this was no ordinary complaint”.

The next day, the committee decided to continue the matter ex parte, and issued a notice to CJI Gogoi, who appeared before it the same day.


Also read: CJI Ranjan Gogoi appears before panel probing sexual harassment charges against him


Sources confirmed that the meeting went on for two hours, where the CJI denied all the allegations against him. Gogoi claimed there was no opportunity to meet the woman, and also responded to the questionnaire that was provided to him before his appearance.

The judges on the panel have been working on nothing else but the proceedings, and have not even attended court during the week. A source close to one of the judges said until the panel submits its report, it is expected that the judges will work on nothing else.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

3 Comments Share Your Views

3 COMMENTS

  1. I feel that Justice Chandrachud and Justice Nariman have definitely come to the rescue of the victim and now there is another cover up going on by the CJI.. I am shocked that other judges of the Supreme Court have not expressed their displeasure at the way the victim has been maligned and humiliated. None must forget that there is a God watching over all of this and that what we sow so shall we reap.

  2. Has Indian Express apologized for this fake news? I haven’t read it. Well done ThePrint to let your readers know this fact.

  3. It would not be surprising if the two honorable Justices have taken this view. Each member of the apex court has an equal right and obligation to do everything possible to maintain its credibility and public image. Should there be a miscarriage of justice in this case, not just the treasured institution but each of its members would have to carry the cross all their lives.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here