Thursday, 26 May, 2022
HomeJudiciaryNo My Lord, Your Lordship — Rajasthan HC asks lawyers to junk...

No My Lord, Your Lordship — Rajasthan HC asks lawyers to junk colonial-era honorifics

The decision was taken unanimously at a full-court meeting of the Rajasthan High Court.

Text Size:

New Delhi: Judges of the Rajasthan High Court have come together to urge lawyers to “desist” from addressing them as ‘My Lord’ and ‘Your Lordship’, a practice that dates back to India’s colonial past.

The decision was taken unanimously at a full-court meeting Sunday. “To honour the mandate of equality enshrined in the Constitution of India, the full court in its meeting dated 14.07.2019 has unanimously resolved to request the counsels and those who appear before the court to desist from addressing the Hon’ble Judges as ‘My Lord’ and ‘Your Lordship’,” the judges said in a notice issued after the meeting.

The use of these honorifics has been discouraged in the past as well.

In 2014, the then Chief Justice of India H.L. Dattu had said it was not mandatory to address judges as “Your Lordship”. The statement had come as the Supreme Court heard a PIL filed by advocate Shiv Sagar Tiwari, who claimed the use of such terms was not just a relic of the colonial era but also a sign of “slavery”.

“When did we say it is compulsory? You can only call us in a dignified manner…” Justice Dattu was quoted as saying during the hearing. “How can this negative prayer be accepted by us? Don’t address us as ‘lordship’. We don’t say anything. We only say address us respectfully.”


Also read: Only 7 of Supreme Court’s 31 judges have declared their assets


 

‘Relics of the colonial past’

Rules of the Bar Council of India also acknowledge that the terms ‘My Lord’ and ‘Your Lordship’ are “relics of the colonial post”. However, the rules state that lawyers should use ‘Your Honour’ or ‘Hon’ble Court’ in the Supreme Court and high courts, and could use ‘sir’ in subordinate courts and tribunals to address judges.

Similar instructions have also been issued by other bar associations.

In June 2007, the Kerala High Court Advocates’ Association passed a resolution, asking members to not use the terms while addressing judges. The Punjab & Haryana High Court Bar Association passed a similar resolution in 2011.

Individual judges have also taken a stand against the practice. In 2009, Madras High Court judge Justice K. Chandru banned lawyers from addressing the court with the two terms.


Also read: What are vacation benches & why some judges work when SC’s on a summer break


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

1 COMMENT

  1. I am extremely happy to see this development as I initiated this issue of mode of addressing by filing the W.P.(C) No. 40 of 2006 in the name of Progressive and Vigilant Lawyers Forum, Supreme Court and on 6 Feb 2006, then bench of Hon’ble CJI Justice Y.K. Sabharwal & Justice C.K.Thakkar asked us to approach Bar Council of India and in May 2006 on 6.5.2006 Gazette notified the Rule 49 (1) I with regards to go away with the colonial practice of My Lord & Your Lordship and replace this with Your Honour or Hon’ble Court for Supreme Court and High Court and Sir/ similarly used respectable words for addressing the courts. Hon’ble J. Ravinder Bhat and J. Murlidhar being in Delhi High Court instructed to registry to mention this in causelist for requesting to Advocates not to use My Lord/Your Lordship
    Hats off Hon’ble Chief Justice Ravinder Bhat.
    These reforms to stop slavery expressions. The Judiciary would be indebted to your leading and reforming sense of responsibility.
    Sanjeev Bhatnagar
    Advocate
    Supreme Court

Comments are closed.

Most Popular

×