Tuesday, 18 January, 2022
HomeJudiciaryNew Central Vista will save Rs 1,000 crore spent annually on rent...

New Central Vista will save Rs 1,000 crore spent annually on rent expenditure, govt tells SC

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta also defended the redevelopment of Parliament building, saying the 100-year-old structure was showing signs of distress and faced safety issues.

Text Size:

New Delhi: The new Central Vista project is not a wastage of money but will save public funds worth Rs 1,000 crore that the administration has been spending annually on rent expenditure, the central government told the Supreme Court Tuesday.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta also defended the redevelopment of the Parliament building, saying the 100-year-old structure was showing signs of distress and faced safety issues, something that has been voiced by its members and speakers too.

Since the members had indicated inadequacies with the present structure, Mehta added, there was no need for a separate independent study to decide if a new Parliament was required, as has been demanded by those challenging the project.

The solicitor general made his submission before a bench led by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, in response to allegations that there was illegal change in land use for the project.

The top court was hearing two petitions challenging the redevelopment project that involves construction of a new Parliament House and 10 administrative buildings for all government ministries. It also includes converting the existing North and South blocks into museums. The project also proposes development of the Central Vista that connects Rajpath to the India Gate.

While issuing notices on the petition, the top court had refused to stay the project, but made it clear that its validity will be subject to the outcome of the petitions before it.

Also read: Cost of proposed new Parliament building sees 18% rise — to Rs 922 cr from Rs 776 cr

‘Heritage buildings will be conserved, not demolished’

According to the government, there is a shortfall of about 0.38 million square meters in office space. With the Central Vista project, this space crunch shall be taken care of since the plan envisages a common secretariat for 51 ministries.

The Parliament project, Mehta said, faces fire safety and space issues, and is showing signs of distress, necessitating the construction of a modern building.

Mehta also assured the bench that existing heritage buildings shall not be demolished but conserved. “The present Parliament will be there as it is. The ceremonies will be held in the central hall. Other rooms will be converted into MP chambers and offices for staff,” he told the bench.

On the construction of a new Parliament building, he said, it has to be at Central Vista and cannot be built in “Gurgaon (Gurugram), Panipat or Noida”.

In response to the petitioners’ claim that no expert advice was sought for this project, Mehta said, “If I feel that the house I am living in is not enough, I do not need to invite an expert to determine that.”

He also said that both Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha remain packed when joint sessions are held, forcing members to sit on plastic chairs. Mehta highlighted security concerns too, pointing at the 2001 Parliament attack. The building is also not earthquake-proof, he added.

Also read: Don’t destroy heritage: 60 ex-IAS, IPS officers urge PM Modi to scrap Central Vista project

‘Government welcomes SC scrutiny, but there should be leeway’

Mehta also countered arguments that no “design competition” was held before finalising the plan. He informed that there was a “concept competition”, since the buildings proposed are functional and not ornamental.

“A design competition is held for projects like war memorials, India Gate etc. that are monuments and do not serve functional purpose,” he said. The solicitor general added that he would make elaborate arguments on this issue later.

Mehta welcomed the Supreme Court’s scrutiny of the project but said “considering the history of the place where the redevelopment is happening” the government should be allowed some leeway.

“Whether there should be a new Parliament or not is a policy decision, which the government is empowered to take. Unless it is utterly arbitrary and atrocious, it is something which the government can decide,” he told the bench.

He also dismissed the petitioners’ argument that there was “non-application of mind” while procuring statutory approvals. Mehta will continue with his arguments Wednesday (4 November) as the hearing remained inconclusive Tuesday.

Also read: Tata group wins contract to build new Parliament, beats L&T’s bid


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. The monstrosity called Indian Parlement should be demolished! I have never seen a more ugly building, not even in eastern Europe!

  2. First of all media is in crisis because this has sold itself out to the corporate and to the Govt. of the day. Media has no moral right except very few one’s to ask for help or make it mandatory for the readers to make subscription compulsory by not allowing to be read. So far Govt. statement is that it will save 1000 crores annually on rent but it should be placed in writing with documents to prove that is spending the amount as such. And what about the Prime Minister’s house which is renovated and made to make it most comfortable and with security measures fully covered will go? Moreover, Govt. will have to spend for the maintenance of the new vista building which will run into more than Rs. 1000 crores per year. What is most important is that is it necessary keeping in view the economic situation and unemployment all over the country as also the Govt.’s inability to provide Universities, Medical institutions, and other institutions of excellence as well as health services all over India, education and most of all poor infrastructure of Policing which are important not the new vista for housing Prime Minister, Vice President and others. parliament seating arrangements have never been short etc. Media must rise to the occasion and not be carrier of Govt. brief.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular