scorecardresearch
Add as a preferred source on Google
Friday, July 10, 2026
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndiaSC to hear Meghalaya's plea against Sonam Raghuvanshi's bail on 14 July

SC to hear Meghalaya’s plea against Sonam Raghuvanshi’s bail on 14 July

Court will examine whether Sonam was given the legally required grounds of arrest before deciding Meghalaya govt's challenge to bail in her husband Raja Raghuvanshi's murder case.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday lists the hearing of Meghalaya government’s plea against bail granted to key accused Sonam Raghuvanshi in her husband Raja Raghuvanshi’s murder on July 14, Tuesday.

A bench of Justices Manoj Misra and Shree Chandrashekhar has asked the Meghalaya government to submit a copy of the ‘grounds of arrest’ which were allegedly provided to Sonam Raghuvanshi.

Sonam was granted bail by a Meghalaya court because the ‘grounds of arrest’ were not provided to her at the time of her arrest. However, as per the prosecution, the ‘grounds of arrest’ were intimated to Sonam. The only issue, as per the Meghalaya government, is that there was one typographical error in the document. Instead of Section 103 (1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which provides the Punishment for the offence of murder, another provision, Section 403 (1), which doesn’t exist, was mentioned as a typo.

In the next hearing, the top court will examine in detail whether the grounds for arrest were provided to Sonam or not as per the law.

On Friday, SC to stay the bail granted to Sonam Raghuvanshi, a key accused in the murder of her husband Raja Raghuvanshi, on a plea filed by the Meghalaya government.

A bench of Justices MM Sundresh and Sheel Nagu, however, orally expressed prima facie reservations over the manner in which the High Court had dealt with the case. Sonam was granted bail by the trial court, which was later upheld by the Meghalaya High Court.

The Supreme Court stated that it was prima facie inclined to stay the bail order, particularly since this was not a case where the grounds of arrest had not been furnished to Sonam. It, however, decided against passing an interim order of stay after taking into account the fact that Sonam had already been released on bail, had spent some time in incarceration and had sought time to respond to the Meghalaya government’s plea. (ANI)

This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular