The Supreme Court in New Delhi| Photo: Manisha Mondal | ThePrint
The Supreme Court in New Delhi | Photo: Manisha Mondal | ThePrint
Text Size:

New Delhi: A ‘careful’ Congress respected the Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict Saturday but found itself in murky waters Sunday when the National Herald – the newspaper affiliated to it – published and then withdrew two opinion pieces that questioned the judgment.

The first of the pieces to be pulled down was written by Sujatha Anandan, a regular columnist with the paper, and was headlined Why a devout Hindu will never pray at the Ram temple in Ayodhya. In it, Anandan wonders if “God can reside in a temple built by force, violence and bloodshed”.

“Can prayers be ever addressed in such a temple even if God does decide to reside there?” Anandan asks.

The Herald pulled down the piece by Sunday evening after the Congress party faced a severe backlash on social media. The paper later apologised for the article.

“We apologise if the article headlined ‘Why a devout Hindu will never pray at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya’ hurt anyone or any group’s sentiments and feelings. That was not our intention,” the paper wrote on its website.  “The views expressed in the article are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of National Herald. –Editor-in-Chief.”

It also apologised on Twitter.

Also read: Grand temple, grand mosque – How the unanimous SC verdict got Ayodhya right

The Herald also removed another opinion piece, written by Aakar Patel, which compared the Supreme Court to the Pakistan Supreme Court. Patel argued in the piece that Supreme Court “has ruled exactly what the VHP and the BJP wanted from the beginning, even after accepting that installing idols and demolishing the mosque was unlawful”.

The controversial pieces 

In the first piece, Anandan also questions the SC judgment while asserting that “strangely (former Shiv Sena chief) Bal Thackeray wanted a school or a hospital built there.”

“I cannot help thinking that the honourable judges attempted to satisfy popular sentiment while at the same time not doing an injustice to those wronged and violated all those years ago,” Anandan wrote. “A balancing act but with a slight tilt in the balance, I should think.”

“Look at the fractured thought process – the judges say placing idols of Lord Ram in the disputed structure in 1949 was wrong and demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992 was clearly unlawful. Then how do two wrongs make a right?” Anandan argued further.

The article also carried a contentious cartoon that equated the demolition of the Babri Masjid with the Supreme Court’s verdict. “Jiski laathi uski bhains” (people with power have their way), read the cartoon.

On the other hand, Patel dwells on the Supreme Court’s concluding statement.

“On a balance of probabilities, the evidence in respect of the possessory claim of the Hindus to the composite whole of the disputed property stands on a better footing than the evidence adduced by the Muslims,” he wrote.

He too slammed the judgment. “What is our Supreme Court saying? That discretion and vandalism must be rewarded because India is a secular country?” he asked.

Patel further argued that he is “unable to figure out the logic and the jurisprudence that links the findings of the court and its conclusions”.

BJP lashes out, Congress guarded

The Congress has so far been guarded in its response.

“The Congress stand is clear as stated in the CWC resolution and at the briefing done by Randeep Singh Surjewala,” said Congress spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.

On Saturday, the party’s chief spokesperson Surjewala said that the Congress “supported the building of the Ram temple”.

The BJP, however, wasted no time in hitting out at the Congress.

‘“National Herald, for which both mother-son are out on bail-it is the jewel of the Gandhi family,” said BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra.

“The way it has commented on the Ayodhya verdict is condemnable. I am quoting — ‘People with power have their waypeople with power have their way ‘Why the Ayodhya verdict reminds us of the Supreme Court of Pakistan’. National Herald, the mouthpiece of the Congress party is reminded of the Ayodhya verdict that has come, which has been pronounced by the Supreme Court. This is shameful. It is worth slamming that the Congress party mouthpiece using such words is belittling the Supreme Court.”

Also read: With Supreme Court Ayodhya verdict, two decades of Ram bashing politics must end


ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

18 Comments Share Your Views


  1. This mumbo-jumbo cacophony of 1000+ pages cannot be called a judgment. It is a dictation given by the Pracharak-in-Chief from Nagpur. The Honourable (In)Justices just read out that mumbo-jumbo under the garb of judgment.

  2. Everyone conveniently forget that preexisting temple of Ram was demolished, like how they hide godra train incident. Media sucks, Congress sucks.

  3. I am an internationalist and have tried to free myself of nationalistic, religious, and other biases. I am truly shocked at what is going on in India. Writing the simple truth about Ayodhya verdict has become so costly and risky! Sujatha Anandan did that and the anti-truth and anti-justice reaction was so severe, widespread, and effective that National Herald had to remove his piece. Writing any truth about the brutal and illegal Indian colonial rule in Kashmir is probably unimaginable in India. What democracy! There can be no real democracy in which the majority is brain-washed, fanatic, anti-truth and anti-justice, and biased. Gone are the days of enviable democracy of Nehru and humanistic teachings of Gandhi. That democracy is turning into demonocracy. And, unfortunately, it is not only in India that this is happening.

  4. I feel that Hindus should not built any temple there , at such place which was crested by bulldozing a religious structure,. Rather than making temple or mosque they should use it for institution like s grand AIIMS, or an IIT may be, this will really help the goals of our secular and modern constitution.

  5. More left the Congress goes more it looks like the Democratic party of US. This verdict was the only possible solution to an long standing issue and needed to be solved.

  6. When will ThePrint start avoiding highly controversial opinion posts that target the government with the sole purpose of accusing and abusing Modi?
    Opinions criticising the government for improving its functioning is welcomed by most readers. When the criticism is part of a political propaganda, ThePrint should be careful to give space to such opinions. Shekhar Gupta give sermons to Modi on a routine basis. I thought let me today give sermons to ThePrint.

  7. Congress will be screwed up with its so called soft hindutva agenda… Though everyone call it a perfect judgment and PM may extrapolate it to the victory of democracy or fall of Berlin wall (Is order for demolishon of a community’s religious place is alike fall of Berlin wall arr you guys listening to such analogy are nuts!!! It could have still been constitutional if the court could have ordered to construct a University or AIIMS. The court only have succumbed to Majoritarian communal ambitions (happily)

    • Not that I’m a fan of what modi but the Collapse of the Berlin Wall analogy was made by the honourable PM in relation to the speech he gave on the Kartarpur sahib opening – as an extrapolation of how India and Pakistan can work towards peace.

      • “PM Modi Says Ayodhya Verdict Coincides With Fall of the Berlin Wall, Calls for Peace for a New India”….. Headline as reported by New18, if you have any other news article in support of your analogy please share.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here