scorecardresearch
Saturday, July 19, 2025
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndia‘Malafide, arbitrary…,’ Govt ban on BBC documentary challenged, SC will hear case...

‘Malafide, arbitrary…,’ Govt ban on BBC documentary challenged, SC will hear case on 6 Feb

Advocate arguing the public interest litigation said the government’s action on documentary ‘India: The Modi Question’ was ‘unconstitutional’.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Supreme Court will hear on 6 February a public interest litigation challenging the central government’s decision to ban a controversial BBC documentary on the 2002 Gujarat riots.

The documentary, titled “India: the Modi Question,” reportedly takes a look at the  rise of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the Bharatiya Janata Party and his alleged “silent” involvement in the 2002 Gujarat riots and the 2020 Delhi riots.

A week after the documentary was released in the United Kingdom on 17 January, unauthorised clips started circulating in India, prompting the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to ban it. The Ministry of External Affairs called it “propaganda”.

On Monday, advocate M.L. Sharma mentioned the matter for an early hearing before a bench headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud.

Questioning the government’s ban, Sharma said it was “malafide, arbitrary and unconstitutional”.

Attempts to screen the documentary in India, particularly across university and college campuses, have not gone down well with authorities, resulting in scuffles and detention of students.

Multiple students’ unions have criticised the ban, with one saying “the block on the documentary is a block on our right to free media and education”.

Last Friday, the Information Ministry used its emergency powers and also banned over 50 links of the documentary on YouTube and Twitter.

The action was taken under Rule 16 of the Information Technology Act, 2021 which states: “In case of emergency nature, the secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting may, if he is satisfied that it is necessary or expedient and justifiable for blocking for public access of any information or part thereof through any computer resource and…as an interim measure issue such directions as he may consider necessary to such identified or identifiable persons, publishers or intermediary in control of such computer resource hosting such information or part thereof without giving him an opportunity of hearing.”


Also read: ‘Let temple people deal with it’: SC dismisses Andhra govt plea for control of Ahobilam temple


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular