Wednesday, February 1, 2023
HomeIndiaIIT-Delhi faculty calls Hindu religion a 20th century invention, triggers controversy

IIT-Delhi faculty calls Hindu religion a 20th century invention, triggers controversy

IIT-Delhi assistant professor Divya Dwivedi says studies prove Mahatma Gandhi was one of the leaders who constructed the idea of ‘false Hindu majority’ in India.

Text Size:

New Delhi: A faculty member of the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi is facing criticism on social media after she questioned the origins of Hinduism and stated that Mahatma Gandhi helped construct the idea of a “false Hindu majority”.

Divya Dwivedi, an assistant professor who teaches philosophy and literature at IIT-Delhi and has co-authored a book on Gandhi, made the comments during a television debate on NDTV last week.

“Hindu Right is the corollary of the idea that India is a Hindu majority population and this is a false majority. The Hindu religion was invented in the early 20th century in order to hide the fact that the lower caste people are the real majority of India…” Dwivedi said on the show that discussed Gandhi and politics.

“In fact, religious minorities have been a victim of this false majority and Gandhi has played a very significant role in its construction. He has helped construct a false Hindu majority and a new Hindu identity…” she said.

Dwivedi added, “He (Gandhi) was one of the many upper caste leaders who constructed this origin for this polity but today we must discard it…”

The IIT-Delhi professor instantly became a target on social media after a video of the debate went viral, with many questioning her credentials and her job at the premier technology institute.

In an emailed response to ThePrint, Dwivedi refused to comment on the controversy, but said there are studies to prove the claims she made.

“There are several academic studies on this much discussed matter. One can refer to D.N. Jha (Looking for a Hindu Identity), Vasudha Dalmia and Heinrich von Stietencron (Representing Hinduism: The Construction of Religious Traditions and National Identity), and the Census of India report of 1921,” she said.

“I jointly made a lengthier statement on these matters in an essay published in the Gandhi special issue of The Indian Express, titled ‘Courage to Begin’.”

Also read: No slowdown at IITs as jobs and internships continue to flow as usual

‘She was frivolous’

In the last couple of days, social media users have targeted Divya Dwivedi with lessons on the history of Hinduism.

“She should sit down and give her mind a rest… 1700–1100 BCE: Hindu Vedas the Rig Veda was composed. 1500 BCE Vedic Age began in India after Indus Valley Civilisation…Religion in Indian subcontinent tracing back to Indus Valley Civilization. Called “oldest religion” in world…” Amrita Bhinder, spokesperson of Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) Chandigarh, wrote on Twitter.

Historian S. Irfan Habib also disagreed with Dwivedi’s comments, calling it frivolous.

“She was really frivolous, had no idea what she is talking about and the context of the debate. Not sure if she has anything to do with the Left though,” he wrote on Twitter.

Who is Divya Dwivedi?

Co-author of Gandhi and Philosophy: On Theological Anti-Politics, Divya Dwivedi is a literature graduate from Lady Shri Ram College. She completed her M.A. and M.Phil from Delhi University and PhD from IIT-Delhi’s Department of Humanities and Social Sciences.

According to her profile on the institute’s website, Dwivedi’s research areas include narratology and literary theory.

Prior to her IIT-Delhi stint, Dwivedi taught at Delhi University’s Department of English and also at St. Stephen’s College.

Also read: Modi govt claims good response from foreign faculty to its advanced joint research plan


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. I think what she said is absolutely true. What she is referring to through the word “hinduism”is the concept of “majority of Hindu in India” and not the origins of it. Also Gandhi was one of the foremost advocate of system Varna dharma of hinduism and was always worried if shudras gain power it would be detrimental to savarnas ( read a letter by Gandhi to Sardar Patel in the context of separate electorates for Shudras and Muslims). Which is why Ambedkar despised Gandhi. Also it is unjustifiable to have Gandhi on our currency, when Ambedkar was actual pioneer for establishment of RBI besides being the chief architect of our constitution.

  2. Now if these fools are teaching at IIT, how will IITs be in top 300. There is left wing brainwashing going on against India and religions in India. It needs to be combated at the state level. These thugs get money from foreign countries to serve their interest.

  3. It simply goes on to show the pathetic state of affairs at elite institutions like the IITs. If such a person can be an Assistant Professor at an old and reputed IIT, one can easily imagine the academic environment prevailing in the institute. No wonder that even the IITs, the creme de la creme of Indian higher education, fail to find a place in global rankings. With such faculty there is absolutely no chance of them figuring in the top 100 of the world.
    Besides, such professors usually have their own agenda to serve and propagate. They make insidious attempts to brainwash young idealistic minds in reputed institutes and lead them astray with their frivolous ideology.
    Prof. Dwivedi would certainly be better off in JNU though. People there, both professors and students, will surely make common cause with her against upper caste Hindus – the favourite punching bags of the liberal/secular gang.

    • Its worse. IIT has created this image where people just want to get it. It isn’t about technology at all, it is just a status symbol.
      You have to work hard for two years (at least) and sit for a 6 hour exam to prove you are eligible for an opportunity to study in India’s best tech institution, only to either join an MNC or move abroad later. You may not have any interest in tech or may even hate it.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular