scorecardresearch
Monday, July 28, 2025
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndiaGovernanceSupreme Court stays high court order asking National Herald publisher to vacate...

Supreme Court stays high court order asking National Herald publisher to vacate offices

An apex court bench also issued notice to the Centre's Land and Development Office on the AJL plea against the HC order to vacate Herald House.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Friday stayed the Delhi High Court order asking the Associated Journals Ltd (AJL), publisher of National Herald, to vacate the Herald House building here.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi also issued notice to the Centre’s Land and Development Office (L&DO) on the AJL plea.

AJL moved the apex court against the high court order dismissing its plea to restrain the Centre from taking any “coercive steps” to vacate its premises at Herald House in ITO area in the heart of the national capital.

The high court held that the entire transaction of transferring shares of AJL to Young Indian (YI) company, in which Congress chief Rahul Gandhi and his mother Sonia Gandhi are majority shareholders, was a “clandestine and surreptitious transfer of the lucrative interest in the premises” to YI.

AJL has also sought the setting aside of the Centre’s October 30, 2018 order, ending its 56-year-old lease and asking it to vacate the premises on the grounds that no printing or publishing activity was going on and that the building was being used only for commercial purposes.

The high court had, on February 28, dismissed the plea of AJL and had said there has been a “misuse” of lease conditions.

The AJL’s plea said that the present political dispensation in power at the Centre has never hidden its pathological hatred for Nehruvian ideals. “One of their favourite propaganda is to blame Pandit Nehru for almost everything that ails the nation. The eviction proceedings constitute a malicious step in the larger design of defaming and effacing the legacy of Pandit Nehru,” it said.

The Centre and L&DO had said in their order that no press has been functioning on the premises for the past 10 years at least and it was being used only for commercial purposes, in violation of the lease deed.

The AJL had denied the allegations in its petitions filed in the high court and in apex court.

The appeal in the top court said the determination of the lease deed is ex facie malicious, arbitrary, based on extraneous grounds, and has been effected for political considerations contrary to the express provisions of the lease deed itself.

It had said that the high court’s several findings have been rendered based on oral arguments of the Centre and a list of dates handed over at the time of arguments without there being a single affidavit placed on record by the official-respondents (Centre).

The high court had agreed with the Centre’s submission, that the breach had been continuing from 2008 till commencement of the digital publication of the newspaper on November 14, 2016.

The L&DO had ended the lease, entered into with the AJL on August 2, 1962 and made perpetual on January 10, 1967, asking the company to hand over the possession by November 15, 2018.

In its plea, the AJL had also said the digital versions of English newspaper National Herald, Hindi’s Navjivan and Urdu’s Qaumi Awaz have commenced from 2016-17.

The weekly newspaper ‘National Herald on Sunday’ resumed on September 24, 2017, and the place of publication was the ITO premises, the AJL had said, adding the Hindi weekly newspaper Sunday Navjivan was being published since October last year from the same premises.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

1 COMMENT

  1. If the L&DO has jurisdiction to terminate the lease, clearly it is a Govt property with clear title. This will blow a hole in Swamy’s main plea against YIL , that it conspired to take over Herald HOuse. How is it possible to take over a Govt building with any kind of share transfer operation ? The title rests firmly with Govt. Barring the Building itself, the rest of the AJL operation is miniscule and its ownership should not wake up all and sundry in Delhi.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular