scorecardresearch
Add as a preferred source on Google
Sunday, October 11, 2026

Support our Journalism

Depth, context and analysis

Subscribe
HomeIndiaDipke rejects Delhi Police claim they offered help after grandma’s death: ‘wanted...

Dipke rejects Delhi Police claim they offered help after grandma’s death: ‘wanted to torment my parents’

CJP founder says Delhi Police video does not show authorities denying him access to his phone so he could talk to his family.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) founder Abhijeet Dipke Sunday hit back at the Delhi Police over a video it released showing him declining assistance after being informed of his grandmother’s death while in detention. Dipke alleged that the police had denied him access to his phone, even for “just a couple of minutes”, to contact his cousin, who was living with his grandmother.

The Delhi Police video was released hours after CJP spokesperson Ashutosh Ranka accused the police of being “inhuman” in the way they informed Dipke of his grandmother’s death. “They were standing with a mic and camera when they told Dipke,” Ranka said at a press conference at the Press Club of India. He added that Dipke had asked to speak to his parents but was not allowed to do so.

Delhi Police, however, maintained that they had offered Dipke all possible assistance.

Deputy Commissioner of Police (Perception Management & Media Cell) Neha Yadav said on Sunday that officers had approached Dipke as soon as they received information about his grandmother’s death, and offered help with flights and phone calls. They also repeatedly asked whether he wanted to speak to his parents, but he declined, she said.


Also Read: Delhi Police arrests 4 members of fringe Hindu Right-wing group for assaulting protesters


‘Deleted parts from video’

Dipke disputed the police’s account, alleging that he had been denied access to his phone throughout the night he was detained. He said the police refused to let him call his cousin, and also denied his request to speak to his lawyer.

“Why Delhi Police didn’t let me use my phone? I had also asked for a call with lawyer which was again denied (sic),” he wrote on X.

He also alleged that the video released by the police does not show him asking for his phone. “Why did you delete the part where I was asking for my phone so I could retrieve my cousin’s number? And where I was asking to let me speak to my lawyers?”

Dipke also said that at 3.30 am, the police asked him to call his father and tell him that he would be going to jail for a long time the following day.

“The same father who has just lost his mother. How much more trauma did you want to put my family through after we already lost my grandmother? What was the purpose of trying to call my parents at 3.30 in the morning? You wanted to torment them?” he asked.

He added that the authorities had approached him at 3.30 am “with arrest papers, demanding that I sign them”.

Earlier in the day, after he was released by police, Dipke said he would return to his village to be with his family.

Dipke and two other CJP leaders, Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka, were released on Sunday, the party’s head of legal affairs, Ratna Singh, said on X. The trio was produced before a special executive magistrate in Delhi Cantt, and their release came with conditions. They cannot engage in any activity that breaches peace and tranquillity for the next year, Singh said.

Delhi Police had taken the three into custody on Saturday from inside an aircraft, shortly after they landed in Delhi from Mumbai. They were in the capital to take part in their planned ‘Jantar Mantar 2.0’ agitation.

Supporters turned out across the national capital Saturday in response to the CJP’s call. However, restrictions and detentions by the authorities prevented the mobilisation seen during the CJP’s July protest against alleged leaks in the NEET-UG examination.

At the press conference, DCP Yadav said the three were detained because permission for the protest at Jantar Mantar had not been granted. She added that permission was denied due to their “failure to follow prescribed procedures, a history of non-compliance with laws and guidelines, and the prevailing security and law-and-order situation”.

Yadav said the CJP’s past conduct “showed a failure to adhere to previously given undertakings and local directives”.

“When permission was granted previously, they did not abide by the law; the crowd they mobilised engaged in heavy stone-pelting, arson, and violence, causing significant damage to public property,” she said.

(Edited by Chingkheinganbi Mayengbam)


Also Read: ‘Jantar Mantar 2.0 is on, we’ll keep fighting’: CJP and SFI refuse to back down from protest


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Nine Years, Made Possible by Readers

In 2017, Shekhar Gupta started ThePrint with a simple belief: Indian readers want journalism that asks why and what next, not just what. And that enough of them would be willing to pay for good journalism.

Nine years on, that belief has held.

And, in these nine years, we’ve stayed true to our mission. We’ve been asking the follow-up questions, going beyond the headlines and explaining what’s actually happening. We’ve travelled across the country to bring you in-depth, visually-compelling stories from the ground.

It’s been nine years of readers choosing to make this possible. If you’d like to be one of them:

Support ThePrint

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular