scorecardresearch
Add as a preferred source on Google
Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Support our Journalism

9th Anniversary: Free Tote & Mug

Subscribe
HomeHealthModerna Covid vaccine spurs 'strong immune response, no serious side-effect' in older...

Moderna Covid vaccine spurs ‘strong immune response, no serious side-effect’ in older adults

The vaccine, called mRNA-1273, is being developed by Moderna with the US govt's National Institutes of Health. The small study involved 40 adults aged over 56.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: A phase 1 investigational trial has revealed that the Covid-19 vaccine developed by US-based pharmaceutical company Moderna elicited a strong immune response in older adults with no serious adverse effects, a study has claimed.

The vaccine, called mRNA-1273, is being developed by Moderna in partnership with the US government’s National Institutes of Health (NIH). For the trial, 40 adults over the age of 56 were inoculated with the vaccine.

The researchers involved in the study were drawn from a host of US institutes, including Emory University School of Medicine and the University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Moderna helped develop the protocol for the study and provided the vaccine, but had no role in funding. The NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases served as sponsor and decision-maker for study design and implementation.

According to the results of the study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on 29 September, the vaccine produced high levels of both binding and neutralising antibodies in older adults.

Neutralising antibodies prevent infectious particles from interacting with host cells while binding antibodies can bind to the coronavirus but do not necessarily attack it.

The study noted that testing the vaccine on older participants was of “paramount importance” since “these persons account for the majority of serious Covid-19 cases and associated deaths”.

It added that the results are also significant because the “immune response to many other vaccines has been shown to decrease with increasing age”.


Also read: US is probing Moderna’s patents over its failure to disclose govt funding


The study

The participants of the study were divided into two subgroups — those between the ages of 56 and 70 and those who were 71 years and older. Both groups received two doses of either 25 micrograms or 100 micrograms of the vaccine, 28 days apart.

The vaccine produced both binding and neutralising antibody reactions in participants of both subgroups, but the “antibody and T-cell responses that were observed in this older population who received the 100-μg (microgram) dose exceeded the response to the 25-μg dose”.

Some participants experienced mild to moderate adverse effects, such as fatigue, chills, headache, myalgia (muscle pain), and pain at the injection site after being vaccinated.

“Such adverse events were dose-dependent and were more common after the second immunization,” the study said.

One of the participants in the 56-70 age group was not given a second dose of the vaccine because they developed an infection in a tissue close to the nail. But, according to the results, “No serious adverse events were reported, and no prespecified trial-halting rules were met.”


Also read: Moderna vaccine produces antibodies in trial of older people


Race for Covid vaccine

Among the limitations of the study is that it was conducted on only 40 participants.

The study recommended the “continued evaluation of the 100-μg dose level and two-dose regimen in a large phase 3 trial with a more diverse population to ascertain the safety and efficacy of the mRNA-1273 vaccine and to assess its level of protection against Covid-19″.

Over 30 other vaccine candidates have entered the clinical trial stage to test for safety and efficacy against the novel coronavirus. Among the front-runners are the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine, which is in phase 2 or 3 trials in various countries, and the RNA-based BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine, which is also in late-stage trials.


Also read: Oxford and Covaxin to Sputnik V — the many Covid vaccines in trial & how they’re faring


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Nine Years, Made Possible by Readers

In 2017, Shekhar Gupta started ThePrint with a simple belief: Indian readers want journalism that asks why and what next, not just what. And that enough of them would be willing to pay for good journalism.

Nine years on, that belief has held.

And, in these nine years, we’ve stayed true to our mission. We’ve been asking the follow-up questions, going beyond the headlines and explaining what’s actually happening. We’ve travelled across the country to bring you in-depth, visually-compelling stories from the ground.

It’s been nine years of readers choosing to make this possible. If you’d like to be one of them:

Support ThePrint

4 COMMENTS

  1. They are failing to tell the public that they are using a totally new technology that will permanently alter the human being to become a genetically modified version. Human 2.0. They are using Messenger RNA to interact and change your whole biology and chemistry, a mutation. Good luck with that.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular