File image of Nepalese PM K.P. Sharma Oli with his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi | Photo: ANI
File image of Prime Minister Narendra Modi with his Nepalese counterpart K.P. Sharma Oli| Representational image | ANI
Text Size:

New Delhi: India and Nepal have age-old civilizational ties of friendship and New Delhi remains committed towards strengthening them, the Ministry of External Affairs said on Thursday, amid a strain in bilateral relations.

India’s assertion comes days after Nepalese Prime Minister K P Oli made critical remarks aimed at India, further straining bilateral relations already impacted over the map issue.

Prime Minister Oli, 68, on Sunday claimed that there have been various kinds of activities in the “embassies and hotels” to remove him from power. He said some Nepalese leaders were also involved in the game.

Asked about Oli’s remarks and the strain in Indo-Nepal ties after Nepal amended its Constitution to update its new political map featuring areas which India maintains belong to it, MEA Spokesperson Anurag Srivastava said, “India and Nepal have age-old civilization ties of friendship, rooted as they are in deep cultural and societal linkages.”

“We remain committed towards continuously strengthening these ties,” he said.

India had termed Nepal’ map move as “untenable” and asserted that artificial enlargement of territorial claims by Nepal is not based on historical facts or evidence.

On trade issues, Srivastava said both sides have worked hard and diligently to ensure smooth flow of trade between the two countries.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

“Even during the times of most stringent COVID-19 lockdown measures in India, the movement of trade in goods and supplies have continued smoothly,” he said.

Asked about reports on problems in flood prevention-related works along the Indo-Nepal border, Srivastava said, “Repair and maintenance of embankments is being carried out regularly by the concerned state governments under the established mechanisms.”


Also read: Kathmandu crossed red lines. India-Nepal relations are entering a deep freeze


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

1 Comment Share Your Views

1 COMMENT

  1. “Nepal is not based on historical facts or evidence. We remain committed towards continuously strengthening these ties,” This is MEA S spoke person Anuraga Srivastava’s remarks whic in my view are are controversial and contradictory. Such unfriendly versions tease us more. Without sitting on table and not examining mutual documental proofs and shadowing Sugauli treaty how can he deny our claims. Should this approach be called friendly or taken as diplomatic version ?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here