Wednesday, 29 June, 2022
HomeDefence‘There should've been more debate before bringing in Agnipath’, says Siachen hero...

‘There should’ve been more debate before bringing in Agnipath’, says Siachen hero Capt Bana Singh

In a now-deleted tweet, he said Centre's defence recruitment scheme 'will badly damage us'. Views of other former military officers remain divided on its long-term implications.

Text Size:

New Delhi: Captain Bana Singh (retd), who played a central role in recapturing a critical post from the Pakistani Army in Siachen in 1987 and was awarded a Param Vir Chakra for his bravery, has spoken out against the Agnipath scheme.

In a now-deleted tweet, Captain Singh said, “Save the country, Agnipath scheme will badly damage us, India is going through a crucial stage. Youngsters are the future of our motherland. 🇮🇳🙏🏼”

Speaking to ThePrint, Captain Singh said, “There should have been more debate and discussion before bringing in the scheme. It makes little sense to bring such sweeping changes without engaging all stakeholders. However, now we must wait and watch how the scheme takes effect.”

Talking about the now-deleted tweet, he said, “Consider it cancelled. I have said what I had to”.

Criticism and protests against the scheme have centered around the sweeping changes introduced to recruitment policies in the armed forces below officer rank. Concerns have mostly been related to job security and the strict age eligibility criteria.

The central government, on its part, has brought in a host of changes and policies to assuage these concerns and ensure job security for the short-term recruits.

Voices for and against Agnipath

Besides Captain Singh, many other retired military personnel have also talked about the scheme, with some speaking for and others against the changes.

Lt General Vinod Bhatia (retired), former director-general of Military Operations (DGMO), said, “Agnipath causes undue turbulence, will need good transition management. Government should ensure that aspirations of Agniveers are met, and there is no adverse impact on combat effectiveness.”

Lt. General H.S. Panag (retired) wrote in ThePrint that the scheme, in theory, is good. However, the government must remain open to ideas to improve it further.

Former Air Vice Marshal Manmohan Bahadur has argued that the scheme is a radical departure from the methodologies used by the Indian Army for over two centuries, and decades by the Indian Air Force and Indian Navy. Any change, he suggests, should have been done in incremental steps and stages.

Former Chief of the Naval Staff, Arun Prakash, has said that the scheme will be difficult to implement in unison for the tri-services. He wrote, “in its present form, is suitable only for the army, whose large infantry component is not excessively burdened with technology. In case of the navy and air force, it must be recognised that at least 5-6 years are required before a new entrant can acquire enough hands-on experience to be entrusted with the operation or maintenance of lethal weapon systems and complex machinery and electronics”.

Former Chief of the Army Staff, V.P. Malik, has vehemently defended the scheme, saying it is “pragmatic and beneficial for the army”.

Also read: Armed forces not about jobs, it’s about passion, says MoD on Agnipath protests


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

Most Popular