New Delhi: In the world of multibillion dollar defense contracts, India stands out.
Home to one of the biggest armed forces on the planet, the country has an uneasy co-existence with neighbors Pakistan and China. Its rapidly aging fighter jets make it a lucrative potential prize for the likes of Lockheed Martin Corp. and Boeing Co. While India wants to upgrade its fleet, there’s one big road block: New Delhi’s famed red tape.
The country — the world’s biggest arms importer, with an annual defense budget of $43 billion — has been dangling a potential $15 billion fighter jet deal for more than a decade, with Lockheed and Boeing, the world’s two largest contractors, vying for the chance to refit India’s air force. Although drawn-out negotiations aren’t uncommon in the arms world, India took 32 years to seal a deal with the U.S. to buy 145 howitzers from BAE Systems Plc, with arcane procurement rules and shifting specifications contributing to the lengthy delays.
| Gabriela Maj/Bloomberg
“It’s frustrating for both sides,” said Laxman Kumar Behera, a research fellow who specializes in arms procurement at New Delhi’s Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses. “No company or industry wants to wait so long. It also creates problems for the armed forces, because they are not getting the equipment on time.”
Also read: Russia to the rescue of IAF, offers 21 MiG-29s to boost strength
Extra cautious
In a country with a long history of corruption allegations — a scandal involving Bofors AB guns in the 1980s brought down a government and delayed the subsequent howitzer deal that was eventually hammered out last year — bureaucrats have turned extra cautious to avoid misdeeds, adding layers of vetting for negotiated contracts.
A wary India, which is hosting its flagship air show this week, has also derailed plans by Lockheed and Boeing to breathe new life into their aging F-16 and F-18 programs. India is still seeking to replace its Soviet-era MiG aircraft, while countries such as Japan and South Korea have acquired modern stealth fighters such as Lockheed’s F-35.
“The Indian Air Force is facing a critical shortage of combat assets and other equipment,” said Caron Natasha Tauro, an analyst at Jane’s by IHS Markit. “With a two-front threat in its north from Pakistan and China, this shortage is perceived to be an immediate threat to national security.”
Also read: Despite Modi’s promise, one more year passes without IAF getting its fighter jets
Immediate need
About a third of India’s 650-strong fleet is more than 40 years old and set to be phased out over the next decade. The IAF has estimated it needs at least 45 squadrons to repel a joint attack from Pakistan and China, compared with a current active strength of about 25. The need is immediate. Just last week, New Delhi blamed Pakistan for a terrorist attack that killed 40 security forces in Kashmir, prompting Prime Minister Narendra Modi to promise a “befitting reply.”
At the biennial air show in the southern city of Bangalore starting Wednesday, Saab AB, Dassault Aviation SA, Lockheed and Boeing will showcase their products as they seek to push for an early deal. Bethesda, Maryland-based Lockheed has sweetened its bid by offering to fit its F-16 Fighting Falcons with an advance radar available on its F-35s, while also promising to manufacture wings for the jet locally. Sweden’s Saab makes the Gripen fighter jet and Boeing makes the F/A-18 Super Hornet.
Representatives of Boeing, Dassault, Lockheed and Saab didn’t respond to requests for comment.
Also read: How Rafale beat competing jets and remained IAF’s choice until Modi signed deal in 2015
Rafale scrutiny
Apart from bureaucratic delays, changes in governments and opposition parties out to embarrass the ruling party over perceived wrongdoings have also added to the mess.
“All big businesses are cognizant that especially in democracies, we have political dispensations, but business goes on,” Ajay Kumar, secretary for defense production, said earlier this month.
One recent example of the muddle: After initially choosing Dassault’s Rafale aircraft, the Indian government scrapped the deal to buy 126 planes in 2015. Instead, Modi opted to buy 36 of the French jets, leaving an order for 110 more still open to contractors. His decision has come under intense scrutiny and criticism by his political detractors months before national elections.
In a report this month, India’s Comptroller and Auditor General said the Indian Air Force “needs to revisit the entire process of acquisition,” because the system was overly-complicated and inefficient.
But even Modi’s record electoral mandate and promises of sweeping changes to boost domestic defense production have not had much impact.
Make in India
He even undermined his own “Make in India” push to boost domestic defense production by canceling the original Rafale purchase — which would have seen some jets made in India — to order made-in-France jets on a slightly faster timeline. And though the auditor’s report cleared Modi’s handling of the purchase, the opposition alleged rules were violated in that process and that his new deal bypassed state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd., which was originally contracted to build most of the jets locally.
The fog surrounding a conclusive deal isn’t likely to lift any time soon as voters are set to elect a new government by May.
Defense procurement and modernization have become so mixed up with domestic politics in India that foreign countries and firms may be reluctant to enter into agreements, said Harsh Pant, an international relations professor at King’s College London.
“What happened with Rafale underscores what’s so rotten in the procurement process,” Pant said. “If Modi, with his political mandate, is unable to deliver 30-odd combat jets to India, you can see the problem.” -Bloomberg
Also read: CAG report pokes holes in UPA-era deal for Pilatus trainer aircraft for IAF
To illustrate the complete idiocy of the acquisition policy, the CAG report on Rafale is instructive. It took the IAF 9 years to acquire a Doppler Radar while it took the Meteorological Department just 9 months. Same Radar, same specs, for the same requirement i.e. weather forecasting!
Under the circumstances It is best that willing companies establish their manufacturing units in India where Indian government must have at least 40 per cent shares.
Why bother then, doesn’t sound like India is serious. No foreign military aviation company is going to setup shop in a corrupt nation with sovereign risk.