File image of INS Vikramaditya
File image of INS Vikramaditya. | Indian Navy
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Indian Navy is firm on its plans to have a third aircraft carrier despite Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) Gen Bipin Rawat’s scepticism, and will approach the government for permission to initiate formal design consultancy, ThePrint has learnt.

“The third aircraft carrier is an operational necessity,” a source in the Navy said. “It is not that an aircraft carrier can be bought off the shelf. Even if all permissions are given today, it will take 15 years for the carrier to be inducted.” 

A second source said the Navy was moving ahead with the design consultancy phase for the carrier, adding that formal permissions would be sought.

The Indian Navy currently operates one aircraft carrier, INS Vikramaditya, while the second, INS Vikrant, is under construction in Cochin, due for commissioning in 2022. Both vessels have a displacement — the measure of a vessel’s weight — of 45,000 tonnes each.

While the Navy has had its eyes set on a third aircraft carrier, General Rawat, who oversees all three military branches in his role as CDS, said earlier this month that it was not a priority. Preference, according to him, would be given to submarines and air-strips on the far-flung Indian islands in the Andamans.


Also Read: Navy’s Tejas aims for first-ever take-off from aircraft carrier Vikramaditya


Third aircraft carrier part of long-term capability planning

Dismissing any budgetary concerns, sources said every force is driven by long-term capability planning that also takes into account budgeting requirements.

Asked if the Navy had budgeted for both submarines and the third carrier, a source said, “The submarines, both nuclear and conventional, are important. The third carrier is a project for the future but work has to begin now. The work that needs to be completed first is the design element. Budget is catered for.”

Navy chief Admiral Karambir Singh had said in December last year that the force’s long-term capability planning envisaged the induction of three aircraft carriers so that two are available for deployment in the Indian Ocean Region, where China has been making inroads, at all times.

A project study initiated during the tenure of former defence minister Manohar Parrikar decided that the third carrier would be a 65,000 CATOBAR (Catapult Assisted Take Off but Arrested Recovery) system with electric propulsion.

‘Shore-based air ops not enough’

Navy sources said shore-based air operations, as preferred by the CDS, were still limited by range, and this is where the aircraft carriers came into play.

They added that External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar had defined the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) as including countries fringing the entire Indian Ocean, from the Strait of Hormuz to Reunion island, from East Africa to Australia, and from Lombok Strait to Malacca Strait.

This vast oceanic expanse, they said, was well beyond the capability of strike aircraft operating from the Indian mainland, which would barely cover even 20 per cent of this area and thus leave vast swathes of IOR unchallenged.

In addition, fighter jets operating in the sea would need a significant amount of time to manoeuvre, especially if challenged by enemy fighters. This limits their range too, they said.

The sources highlighted that shore-based strike aircraft from any service, be it the Navy or the Air Force, would be in a defending position at best within 1,000 km of the coast.


Also Read: From INS Vikrant to INS Imphal, how names of Indian Navy ships have evolved over the years


‘Must have two aircraft carriers operational at all times’

The sources reiterated Admiral Singh’s concerns, saying it was important to have a third carrier because it would ensure two are always ready for deployment, even when one is in for refits.

“The Vikramaditya will also age over the next two decades. Moreover, the Navy’s project for 57 fighters along with the the twin-engine Tejas, as well as the currently-used MiG-29K, caters to… three carriers,” one of the aforementioned sources said.

The sources added that the country had to decide whether it planned to “play a bigger game” in the global maritime structure.

They pointed out how the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy of China, which has been making repeated forays into the Indian Ocean Region, plans to become a four-aircraft-carrier force by the end of the decade.

By 2049, they added, China was looking to have 10 aircraft carriers.

Aircraft carriers ‘back in reckoning’

The sources sought to note how countries like the UK, which had developed doubts about aircraft carriers, had once again woken up to their potential.

The US, one of them said, “of course continues to repose their faith in aircraft carriers”. 

While Russia, Italy and France operate aircraft carriers, the sources added, Japan was in the process of converting all its helicopter carriers into aircraft carriers. Australia, they said, had helicopter carriers that are equipped to operate fighter aircraft in a jiffy. 


Also Read: Boeing plans trials of its Super Hornet jets on ski-jump ramp to meet Indian requirements


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

10 Comments Share Your Views

10 COMMENTS

  1. Instead of thinking Small we must think big and design a super big aircraft carrier with displacement of 200000 tons capable of 1000 fighter jets .it will destroy all the Chinese navy in one go and the battle will be over soon

    • Pretty rich for the Chinese to pontificate about starvation when in fact idiotic Chinese policies during the “Great Leap Backward” caused 50 million people to perish.

    • Dear brother don’t misunderstand that India’s poor is starving because India doesn’t have resources.
      It’s because of the corruption in the system and the sheer density and ingnorance of common of people in the country, organisation is always a magnanimous task.
      None of the administrations have found a full proof solution for proper distribution of goods and other resources.
      A country whose political lobbyists bullies it’s own people in to a submissive Enterprise, destroys its own Millennial old Rich culture and sets out for world domination stands far below in line to ‘Veto’ a struggling yet ‘A Free Country for all human beings created equal by all God’s Old and new as enshrined in the Constitution of India’.

    • The point is atleast the data can come out from India, Hope we could have said the same about China. By the way did you took permission from uncle Ping ping before commenting here? You could be punished if not.

  2. People who criticise navy chief’s demand should read the history of 1971 war which gave birth to Bangladesh. Attacks on Chittagong and other port cities by INS Vikrant, then an ailing aircraft carrier helped prevent west Pakistan ‘s support to its army. That accelerated the fall of Pak military in the East. No doubt Gen Rawat’s priority is right. But so is the demand of navy chief especially with China now on the prowl in Indian Ocean.

  3. Rash remarks are just that : Rash. There is great weight in what CDS says : Strengthen peripheries today in A&N with funds avlbl. This itself will cause VISIBLE deterrences to the advantages of IN in IOR.
    Then down the line a further rethink could be done. No need for ego issues.
    Again once economy gets going in the next 6 months or so we must seek a higher allottment @3% GDP for defence per annum.This keeping in mind our neighborhood , our true place in Asia and emerging IndoPacific and our need to maintain a greater modicum of military heft in the circumstances.

  4. This CDS has army background n therefore have no clue on how the airforce n navy operates. Perhaps he must be given tuition classes on what equipment are used by navy n airforce n what is their significance.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here