scorecardresearch
Add as a preferred source on Google
Monday, September 7, 2026

Support our Journalism

9th Anniversary: Free Tote & Mug

Subscribe
HomeDefenceDefence ministry distances itself from Indian firm in eye of Estonia minister...

Defence ministry distances itself from Indian firm in eye of Estonia minister resignation scandal

Estonian defence minister had announced his resignation after Estonia paid Datasel, acquired by NECO Defence, for artillery shells for Ukraine that the company never made or sold.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Indian defence ministry has distanced itself from Neco Defence Munitions—the company at the centre of an arms scandal that led to the resignation of Estonia’s Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur—saying it has not dealt with the firm.   

Defence sources said NECO Defence is part of a Nagpur-based group in the steel manufacturing business, owned by Anand Jaiswal and Siddharth Jaiswal. 

They added that NECO Defence had acquired a small Italian arms and ammunition making firm called Datasel, and they have a Romania-based manufacturing facility, with a contract for filling artillery shells to supply to Estonia for onward supply to Ukraine. 

“There are no dealings or supply orders from our armed forces but they may have supplied to state police as claimed in their website. No connection or dealings with MoD,” a source underlined.

As reported, Pevkur had last week announced his resignation saying he was taking political responsibility for problems identified within Estonia’s defence establishment, including the country’s military procurement agency, the Estonian Centre for Defence Investments (ECDI).

The company at centre of the scandal is Datasel S.R.L., the Italian firm acquired by Neco Defence Munitions in March 2024.

According to Estonia’s public broadcaster ERR, neither Datasel nor its Indian owner had previously produced the artillery shells that Estonia sought to procure.

Datasel, however, disputes Estonia’s version of events.

In a statement to Euractiv, the company said last week that it was “the victim” of the dispute and rejected the grounds for termination. It said it had supplied and invoiced €58 million worth of material against €59 million in advance payments and that no quality problems had been established in inspections conducted under the contracts.

(Edited by Gitanjali Das)


Also Read: 4 Agniveers questioned after AK-203 assault rifles, pistols, ammo stolen from Madras Regiment armoury


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Nine Years, Made Possible by Readers

In 2017, Shekhar Gupta started ThePrint with a simple belief: Indian readers want journalism that asks why and what next, not just what. And that enough of them would be willing to pay for good journalism.

Nine years on, that belief has held.

And, in these nine years, we’ve stayed true to our mission. We’ve been asking the follow-up questions, going beyond the headlines and explaining what’s actually happening. We’ve travelled across the country to bring you in-depth, visually-compelling stories from the ground.

It’s been nine years of readers choosing to make this possible. If you’d like to be one of them:

Support ThePrint

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular