Protesters from the region, including the families of the accused, are demanding a CBI probe, and contesting the J&K Police investigators’ chargesheet.
The launch of Amma Makkal Munetra Kazhagam comes weeks after actors Kamal Haasan and Rajinikanth took the political plunge and amid the continued political churn in Tamil Nadu.
The graduation is meant to bolster the legacy and legitimacy of Sheikh Hasina's Awami League, even as the real-world preparedness lagged behind the glossy narrative.
Speaking at 2nd Investor Connect, CM Vishnu Deo Sai says 'we have been able to attract a lot of investors.' The focus of the event was the steel sector.
In largest overhaul of military command in 5 decades, Field Marshal Asim Munir set to assume post of Chief of Defence Forces tomorrow, as Army claims primacy in Pakistan armed forces.
It is a brilliant, reasonably priced, and mostly homemade aircraft with a stellar safety record; only two crashes in 24 years since its first flight. But its crash is a moment of introspection.
The Hindu article is based on a logical inconsistency. CCTV footage could certainly confirm the presence; CCTV does not necessarily confirm the absence of an individual.
Let me point out the inconsistency
The proposition that “accused not being seen in the footage is sign of his absence” is acceptable ONLY when the proposition is allowed to IMPLY that entire area is covered by CCTV and every exam-taker would certainly be captured by CCTV.
But, then later saying that a proxy MIGHT HAVE BEEN USED without showing the footage of the proxy simply contradicts the IMPLICATION of the proposition” How? “Might have” implies doubt about everyone being captured and implies that there is chance of not being captured by CCTV.
Registrar can temporarily justify his use of “Might have” by ascribing to his ignorance. It’s expected of the registrar to identify and show who is the proxy in the footage. If he does not identify the proxy’s appearance in the footage , then his inference of absence of the accused’s non-appearance in the footage would become invalid.
It gave me goosebumps imagine how innocent child went through such horrying situation ,even if for second we believe she was not raped but she was murdered too brutally who killed her who kidnapped innocent do u have answer
Wow. I am actually impressed (and super surprised) that a one-sided biased entity like Print published something like this.
What is incredibly frustrating is this – a case so full of holes. Damn – the place does not even have a window (that you can close) generated so much mass hysteria, flamed up by the media irresponsibly. India gets written about in a poor light negatively, Hindu gods and goddesses vilified and defiled and everybody goes scott free. How unfair is that?
And people complain when we call the media biased and address people as sickular. About time MSM wakes up and smells the coffee and do their job responsibly.
Sarcasm apart, thank you for publishing this point of view. Please keep the articles and opinions balanced and please don’t be driven by a political agenda. The purpose of jounalism will be lost. It is so important that you guys have a semblance of unbiased reporting for a healthy democracy.
You have written an interesting article!
The Hindu article is based on a logical inconsistency. CCTV footage could certainly confirm the presence; CCTV does not necessarily confirm the absence of an individual.
Let me point out the inconsistency
The proposition that “accused not being seen in the footage is sign of his absence” is acceptable ONLY when the proposition is allowed to IMPLY that entire area is covered by CCTV and every exam-taker would certainly be captured by CCTV.
But, then later saying that a proxy MIGHT HAVE BEEN USED without showing the footage of the proxy simply contradicts the IMPLICATION of the proposition” How? “Might have” implies doubt about everyone being captured and implies that there is chance of not being captured by CCTV.
Registrar can temporarily justify his use of “Might have” by ascribing to his ignorance. It’s expected of the registrar to identify and show who is the proxy in the footage. If he does not identify the proxy’s appearance in the footage , then his inference of absence of the accused’s non-appearance in the footage would become invalid.
It gave me goosebumps imagine how innocent child went through such horrying situation ,even if for second we believe she was not raped but she was murdered too brutally who killed her who kidnapped innocent do u have answer
Wow. I am actually impressed (and super surprised) that a one-sided biased entity like Print published something like this.
What is incredibly frustrating is this – a case so full of holes. Damn – the place does not even have a window (that you can close) generated so much mass hysteria, flamed up by the media irresponsibly. India gets written about in a poor light negatively, Hindu gods and goddesses vilified and defiled and everybody goes scott free. How unfair is that?
And people complain when we call the media biased and address people as sickular. About time MSM wakes up and smells the coffee and do their job responsibly.
Sarcasm apart, thank you for publishing this point of view. Please keep the articles and opinions balanced and please don’t be driven by a political agenda. The purpose of jounalism will be lost. It is so important that you guys have a semblance of unbiased reporting for a healthy democracy.