Israel's successes in Lebanon are spearheaded by the Intelligence Corps and the Air Force, which gave calls to cease volunteer reserve service should Netanyahu curtail the Supreme Court's authority.
Financial year 2022-23 saw private investments & hiring surge, but since then firms are using cash to reduce debt. General elections didn’t help matters, either.
Ambassador Amit Narang wore combat uniform at closing ceremony of India-Oman joint military exercise. Only serving personnel can wear service uniforms, say veterans.
How come Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey and Sri Lanka remain constitutional, democratic and stable despite Islam and Buddhism respectively, but Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar don’t?
So…. why not order every billionaire to be the father of all children? It’s what’s best for the children, of course. Especially if paternity no longer matters. Feminism really is cancer.
“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.”
― Adolf Hitler
A very manipulative article that promptly skirts around the main Issue where women who are unsure of the real paternity of their ‘to be children’ name their current spouse because he is most likely to raise and care for them.
The attempts to draw parallels between a misguided persons attempt to love his own child which is not really his and then carefully without saying it out loud, drawing from historical and traditional outlooks merging them together as a duty is the sickness you think is justified that’s breeds this sense of entitlement and conclusion that misattributed paternity is not a heinous crime.
Let me draw this in a straight Line :
Historical Anecdotes has no reference or control over decisions over the future. They should be independent and must safeguard all individuals, adults as well as kids. Moreover Cheating is considered an especially heinous Crime since antiquity especially attempts at making fathers raise others kids by deception
Fatherhood is a “performative” role yes. But the premise is based on acceptance. Acceptance that the child is Yours OR that you will raise the kid as your child. The latter requires the person to make a decision and in a way ‘adopt’ that child. In paternity fraud there is NO Choice. The individual has no future say or way to fund his actual biological children that he may have (provided he is not broken enough to have any) and uses him as a sacrificial pawn to fuel for the wellbeing of a child whose real father is not doing so
Paternity Fraud Should not be considered in case of Surrogacy or any artificial pregnancy methods. Since in a Way the father has already accepted the child at one point so drawing parallels from this to cases of legit paternal fraud is gross deception .
In No point is the woman ever held accountable for deception. Fined or Punished for it, just because she is “pivotal for the wellbeing of the child” whereas the man is held accountable for the financial wellbeing of the kid. With the biological father not even being in the picture.
This is only from a child’s perspective. What about a man? What about his nature given right to reproduce and get a child? What about his rights to live a happy life then live a life as a father to some another man’s blood? The child was conceived from an affair. And your answers would only motivate women to go on in affairs. And if the child is born , then the man should he pinned down because you said “ social views as a father” . This is the reasons why hate communities like MGTOW are in rise
So…. why not order every billionaire to be the father of all children? It’s what’s best for the children, of course. Especially if paternity no longer matters. Feminism really is cancer.
“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.”
― Adolf Hitler
A very manipulative article that promptly skirts around the main Issue where women who are unsure of the real paternity of their ‘to be children’ name their current spouse because he is most likely to raise and care for them.
The attempts to draw parallels between a misguided persons attempt to love his own child which is not really his and then carefully without saying it out loud, drawing from historical and traditional outlooks merging them together as a duty is the sickness you think is justified that’s breeds this sense of entitlement and conclusion that misattributed paternity is not a heinous crime.
Let me draw this in a straight Line :
Historical Anecdotes has no reference or control over decisions over the future. They should be independent and must safeguard all individuals, adults as well as kids. Moreover Cheating is considered an especially heinous Crime since antiquity especially attempts at making fathers raise others kids by deception
Fatherhood is a “performative” role yes. But the premise is based on acceptance. Acceptance that the child is Yours OR that you will raise the kid as your child. The latter requires the person to make a decision and in a way ‘adopt’ that child. In paternity fraud there is NO Choice. The individual has no future say or way to fund his actual biological children that he may have (provided he is not broken enough to have any) and uses him as a sacrificial pawn to fuel for the wellbeing of a child whose real father is not doing so
Paternity Fraud Should not be considered in case of Surrogacy or any artificial pregnancy methods. Since in a Way the father has already accepted the child at one point so drawing parallels from this to cases of legit paternal fraud is gross deception .
In No point is the woman ever held accountable for deception. Fined or Punished for it, just because she is “pivotal for the wellbeing of the child” whereas the man is held accountable for the financial wellbeing of the kid. With the biological father not even being in the picture.
This article is from shows double standard of feminist gangs who demands everything modern but asking to ditch modern paternity issues.
This is only from a child’s perspective. What about a man? What about his nature given right to reproduce and get a child? What about his rights to live a happy life then live a life as a father to some another man’s blood? The child was conceived from an affair. And your answers would only motivate women to go on in affairs. And if the child is born , then the man should he pinned down because you said “ social views as a father” . This is the reasons why hate communities like MGTOW are in rise