For the last five decades, MSP has always been a piece of paper for most farmers. But now we have a Prime Minister who says, “MSP tha, hai, or rahega!”
Meghan Markle’s unsurprisingly doomed co-habitation with an archaic dynasty has ended up hardening divisions in what the Guardian this week called 'a culture war.'
The Modi government may claim it has its own feedback mechanisms. But officials and ministers are unlikely to give negative news for fear of being put in the dock
More patients are seeking help for lingering effects of Covid like fatigue, breathlessness and brain fog. But, so far, research into Long Covid has suffered from various limitations.
In episode 698 of Cut the Clutter, Shekhar Gupta said Ariz Khan's conviction brings 'closure' to 2008 Batla House encounter. He also dwelt on Biden administration's Afghan peace plan.
The last time this matter flared up was when Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, in a very similar directive in April, called for the relocation of stray dogs in the capital.
Finance ministry says the proposed revamp will focus on structural reforms, rate rationalisation & ease of living, & will be deliberated upon in the coming weeks.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
Bundle of lies. Why doesn’t he mention that BJP netas including Modi ,Jaitley & Prasad called this as Tax terrorism when UPA introduced the amendment & on several forums including BJP manifesto promised to undo tax terrorism, the arbitration tribunal even mentioned this fact in their order , the court also mentioned that issue is not the sovereign power of the state but fairness. A blatant lie is that Govt did not recover any amount from these firms, govt indeed recovered sizable amount by selling shares of Vedanta , the holding company of Cairn, it was a double jolt, Cairn is a foreign company but, Govt used brutal power to sell indian holding company shares through Income tax department, yes income tax department is used for such dirty operations also in addition to raiding political opponents at the time of elctions. Probably because of such high handedness of Indian Govt Vedanta decided to de-list indian company, but that attempt was deceptively subverted by Govt by using LIC who is a major share holder in Vedanta, to offer a very high price for their holding, hence the delisting failed, a rare instance in Indian Bourses. But the irony is now Govt has to pay >double the amount of price at which they sold Vedanta shares to buy back these shares from market,since the market prices has gone up.
The author is misrepresenting facts. He claims that India did not recover any taxes through the retrospective amendment which is simply untrue. GOI seized assets of Cairn in lieu of taxes due and this is what Cairn is now fighting to get back. Irrespective of what US, UK etc do retrospective change in taxation is bad faith. If it becomes acceptable as the author argues then what stops government from retrospectively taxing it’s citizens?
Bundle of lies. Why doesn’t he mention that BJP netas including Modi ,Jaitley & Prasad called this as Tax terrorism when UPA introduced the amendment & on several forums including BJP manifesto promised to undo tax terrorism, the arbitration tribunal even mentioned this fact in their order , the court also mentioned that issue is not the sovereign power of the state but fairness. A blatant lie is that Govt did not recover any amount from these firms, govt indeed recovered sizable amount by selling shares of Vedanta , the holding company of Cairn, it was a double jolt, Cairn is a foreign company but, Govt used brutal power to sell indian holding company shares through Income tax department, yes income tax department is used for such dirty operations also in addition to raiding political opponents at the time of elctions. Probably because of such high handedness of Indian Govt Vedanta decided to de-list indian company, but that attempt was deceptively subverted by Govt by using LIC who is a major share holder in Vedanta, to offer a very high price for their holding, hence the delisting failed, a rare instance in Indian Bourses. But the irony is now Govt has to pay >double the amount of price at which they sold Vedanta shares to buy back these shares from market,since the market prices has gone up.
The writer has represented the prosecution team apparently. That explains the tone of this article. Dismissed.
The author is misrepresenting facts. He claims that India did not recover any taxes through the retrospective amendment which is simply untrue. GOI seized assets of Cairn in lieu of taxes due and this is what Cairn is now fighting to get back. Irrespective of what US, UK etc do retrospective change in taxation is bad faith. If it becomes acceptable as the author argues then what stops government from retrospectively taxing it’s citizens?