Delhi is not a state, but should be regarded as one in some instances– that is the only way to reconcile constitutional text with democratic form of government.
It takes 8-10 years for a selection process to be carried through while the defence services wait. Indeed, in the end, there may be no acquisition at all.
India's stern message has to first go to perpetrators in J&K— the people who brought in the explosives, helped in storing it and organising Pulwama attack.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has no intention of being drawn into another attritional war with Hezbollah. His commanders they are unlikely to win.
Under this model, battery is provided to EV owners on a subscription basis or lease. With more people open to buying EV cars, the lower upfront cost could likely drive wider acceptance.
The armoured platform is India's first amphibious infantry combat wheeled vehicle. Last year, the Royal Moroccan Armed Forces had procured 90 military trucks from the Tata Group.
How come Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey and Sri Lanka remain constitutional, democratic and stable despite Islam and Buddhism respectively, but Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar don’t?
During informal conversations, most people from Norther India and Pakistan actually speak Hindustani and not Hindi or Urdu respectively. Indeed, for a majority of Indians, North Indians included, the chaste, Sanskritised Hindi used in broadcasting, newspapers, railway station announcements, in aircrafts etc. is hard to follow. Ditto for Pakistanis who hear Arabicised Hindu spoken in TV.
This obsession with Hindi and Urdu in both these countries completely misses the fact that as communication tools, they confer little practical benefits and generate more political headaches. Indeed, in the case of Pakistan, Jinnah’s decision to impose Urdu over both wings of Pakistan was one of the factors that lead to the break up of that country. Similar resentments against the imposition and promotion of Hindi, often at the expense of other languages has been a detriment to creating cohesion in the country.
Correction: Sentence in second paragraph should read:
“Ditto for Pakistanis who hear Arabicised Urdu spoken on TV”
Apologies for the typo.
The author has deeply analyzed the linguistic situation of Abu Dhabi that shows his excellent command on sociolinguists.
In addition to Nepalese, Sri Lankans and Bangladeshis, Hindi is widely used as a means of communication by Pakistanis as well.
I would call it Hindustani not Hindi.
That is an important distinction that you make.
During informal conversations, most people from Norther India and Pakistan actually speak Hindustani and not Hindi or Urdu respectively. Indeed, for a majority of Indians, North Indians included, the chaste, Sanskritised Hindi used in broadcasting, newspapers, railway station announcements, in aircrafts etc. is hard to follow. Ditto for Pakistanis who hear Arabicised Hindu spoken in TV.
This obsession with Hindi and Urdu in both these countries completely misses the fact that as communication tools, they confer little practical benefits and generate more political headaches. Indeed, in the case of Pakistan, Jinnah’s decision to impose Urdu over both wings of Pakistan was one of the factors that lead to the break up of that country. Similar resentments against the imposition and promotion of Hindi, often at the expense of other languages has been a detriment to creating cohesion in the country.
Correction: Sentence in second paragraph should read:
“Ditto for Pakistanis who hear Arabicised Urdu spoken on TV”
Apologies for the typo.
The author has deeply analyzed the linguistic situation of Abu Dhabi that shows his excellent command on sociolinguists.