The Supreme Court ruled that the disputed site belonged to Hindus and a 5-acre plot will be handed over to Sunni board in Ayodhya for construction of a mosque.
From former CJI Dipak Misra’s 200-word-long sentences to high courts’ ‘hereat wherewithin’ orders, judges have a history of using complicated language.
Four men, including two Pakistanis, got death penalty for killing 7 jawans & a civilian on 1 January 2008. Two others got jail terms, while two were acquitted.
Forget comparing it with classics like Hrithik’s Ek Pal Ka Jeena or the slick title track of Dhoom 2, Janaab-e-Aali does not even come close to Ghungroo.
India’s industrial output growth saw a 10-month low in June, with Index of Industrial Production (IIP) growing by mere 1.5% as against 1.9% in May 2025.
Standing up to America is usually not a personal risk for a leader in India. Any suggestions of foreign pressure unites India behind who they see as leading them in that fight.
Tragic day for justice and for India. SC confused and contradictory –
says demolition was a violation of the rule of law and then goes on to reward the people who did it.
The demolition was a criminal act according to the SC
Now the proceeds of the crime the criminals are allowed to keep.
There can be no closure until the people who organised the demolition of the Mosque are brought to justice.
Most of them are likely to do of old age before the trial concludes.
1,045 pages, so there must be fine exposition of fact and law. The bottom line is that a site on which a mosque stood for 450 years will now be handed over to the majority community for construction of a temple. How the site was vacated is known to all. One. cannot judge if an alternate site of five acres of land for construction of a mosque constitutes justice – more than compensation – to Indian Muslims.
Tragic day for justice and for India. SC confused and contradictory –
says demolition was a violation of the rule of law and then goes on to reward the people who did it.
The demolition was a criminal act according to the SC
Now the proceeds of the crime the criminals are allowed to keep.
There can be no closure until the people who organised the demolition of the Mosque are brought to justice.
Most of them are likely to do of old age before the trial concludes.
1,045 pages, so there must be fine exposition of fact and law. The bottom line is that a site on which a mosque stood for 450 years will now be handed over to the majority community for construction of a temple. How the site was vacated is known to all. One. cannot judge if an alternate site of five acres of land for construction of a mosque constitutes justice – more than compensation – to Indian Muslims.